| Literature DB >> 35115238 |
Yan Yan1, Kiyohide Tomooka2, Toshio Naito3, Takeshi Tanigawa2.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has shaped the dynamics of many diseases. This study aims to assess how the pandemic affected community-acquired pneumonia admission of all age groups among Japanese hospitals with various size and availability of COVID-19 wards. Our findings revealed a 44%-53% reduction in community-acquired pneumonia admission among 82 hospitals in Japan, from April through September of 2020, compared to the same period of 2019. Decreases were consistently found among hospitals with and without COVID-19 wards. The most significant decrease was found in the age group <20 years old. COVID-19 preventive measures and personal hygiene are considered to be effective measures to prevent the spreading of this disease. As vaccination progresses and the public gradually become less attentive to infection countermeasures, incidence of community-acquired pneumonia may increase in the coming season. Continued monitoring is required.Entities:
Keywords: Admission; COVID-19; Community-acquired pneumonia; Pandemic; SARS-CoV-2
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35115238 PMCID: PMC8776425 DOI: 10.1016/j.jiac.2022.01.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Infect Chemother ISSN: 1341-321X Impact factor: 2.211
Characteristics of studied hospitals (n = 82).
| Classification of hospitals | Number of hospitals | Average number of hospital beds | Affiliation to universities | Located in certified high-alarm areas | No. of pneumonia inpatients (Apr through Sep 2020) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| With COVID-19 wards | Size of hospital | University hospitals | Non-University hospitals | High-alarm areas | Other areas | |||
| Yes | ≥400 beds | 38 | 607 | 21% | 79% | 71% | 29% | 1579 |
| Yes | <400 beds | 31 | 261 | – | 100% | 81% | 19% | 900 |
| No | ≥400 beds | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| No | <400 beds | 13 | 241 | – | 100% | 46% | 54% | 164 |
The certified high-alarm areas are determined by the Japanese government to emphasize the efforts required to suppress the spread of SARS-CoV-2 infections, including 13 areas: Hokkaido, Tochigi, Saitama, Chiba, Kanagawa, Gifu, Aichi, Ishikawa, Kyoto, Osaka, Hyogo, Fukuoka prefectures and Tokyo metropolitan.
No. of pneumonia inpatients is defined as no. of new inpatients from April 1 to September 30, 2020 in the studies 82 hospitals in Japan. If patients' hospitalization extended to the next calendar month, when calculating the percentage of pneumonia inpatients during the same period (2020 vs. 2019), these patients were counted in both months.
Fig. 1Decreased pneumonia inpatients among Japanese hospitals of various sizes, with and without COVID-19 wards.
Lines in the three panels show the number of inpatients in April through September 2020, as the percentage of the same period in 2019. Pneumonia was compared to neoplasms and circulatory diseases. In addition, daily new confirmed cases of COVID-19 in Japan are shown.
Source: Daily numbers of newly confirmed cases are from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/covid-19/open-data.html. Last accessed on August 22, 2021. (in Japanese).
Percentage of hospital pneumonia inpatients in 2020, compared to 2019; analyzed by age group and hospital type.
| Percentage of monthly hospital pneumonia inpatients (April through September; 2020 vs 2019) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| April | May | June | July | August | September | Average (Apr through Sep) | ||
| With COVID-19 wards; ≥400 beds (n = 38) | 23.3% | 7.0% | 9.2% | 15.2% | 10.0% | 11.0% | 12.8% | |
| With COVID-19 wards; <400 beds (n = 31) | 29.7% | 9.1% | 15.9% | 17.4% | 11.2% | 5.8% | 14.6% | |
| Without COVID-19 wards; <400 beds (n = 13) | 18.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 3.3% | |
| With COVID-19 wards; ≥400 beds (n = 38) | 104.5% | 51.9% | 32.4% | 46.3% | 42.9% | 47.6% | 51.4% | |
| With COVID-19 wards; <400 beds (n = 31) | 57.9% | 31.3% | 71.4% | 54.5% | 80.0% | 100.0% | 62.8% | |
| Without COVID-19 wards; <400 beds (n = 13) | 40.0% | 12.5% | 12.5% | 33.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 13.5% | |
| With COVID-19 wards; ≥400 beds (n = 38) | 76.0% | 52.5% | 49.5% | 47.5% | 60.2% | 58.6% | 56.9% | |
| With COVID-19 wards; <400 beds (n = 31) | 67.3% | 54.1% | 45.3% | 45.6% | 71.7% | 87.0% | 58.6% | |
| Without COVID-19 wards; <400 beds (n = 13) | 46.2% | 31.3% | 46.2% | 72.7% | 25.0% | 75.0% | 46.6% | |
| With COVID-19 wards; ≥400 beds (n = 38) | 62.1% | 52.8% | 52.9% | 51.1% | 62.4% | 74.1% | 58.2% | |
| With COVID-19 wards; <400 beds (n = 31) | 76.4% | 39.4% | 59.8% | 56.4% | 82.6% | 90.0% | 64.3% | |
| Without COVID-19 wards; <400 beds (n = 13) | 56.7% | 43.2% | 47.1% | 73.9% | 59.1% | 31.3% | 51.9% | |
| With COVID-19 wards; ≥400 beds (n = 38) | 71.6% | 63.7% | 62.7% | 59.0% | 71.3% | 71.4% | 66.2% | |
| With COVID-19 wards; <400 beds (n = 31) | 59.6% | 45.8% | 63.5% | 66.8% | 61.5% | 75.2% | 60.7% | |
| Without COVID-19 wards; <400 beds (n = 13) | 73.3% | 56.7% | 52.2% | 43.6% | 38.6% | 28.9% | 50.1% | |
| ≥ | ||||||||
| With COVID-19 wards; ≥400 beds (n = 38) | 77.2% | 62.6% | 54.7% | 46.3% | 49.6% | 50.4% | 57.0% | |
| With COVID-19 wards; <400 beds (n = 31) | 70.4% | 62.8% | 55.4% | 60.3% | 56.1% | 61.6% | 61.2% | |
| Without COVID-19 wards; <400 beds (n = 13) | 51.0% | 50.0% | 49.0% | 46.7% | 47.6% | 71.9% | 50.5% | |
Note: 0% indicates no inpatient for the associated month of 2020.