| Literature DB >> 35113948 |
Paschal A Apanga1, Jamil Ahmed2, Windy Tanner3,4, Katherine Starcevich1, James A VanDerslice3, Ubed Rehman2, Najeebullah Channa2, Scott Benson3, Joshua V Garn1.
Abstract
In Pakistan, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is expected to greatly increase the already high mortality and morbidity rates attributed to infections, making AMR surveillance and prevention a priority in the country. The aims of the project were to characterize the prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) in healthcare facility sink drains in Pakistan and to characterize how physical characteristics of sinks and healthcare facility rooms were associated with CRE in those sinks. The study took place in 40 healthcare facilities in Jamshoro Pakistan. Swabs were collected from sink drains in each facility that had a sink, and structured observations of sinks and facilities were performed at each facility. Swabs were plated on CHROMagar KPC to screen for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, which were then isolated on Mueller-Hinton agar plates. Antibiotic susceptibility was determined using the disk diffusion method to assess resistance to carbapenems, cephalosporins, and fluoroquinolones. Thirty-seven of the healthcare facilities had at least one sink, and thirty-nine total sinks were present and sampled from those healthcare facilities. Sinks in these facilities varied in quality; at the time of sampling 68% had water available, 51% had soap/alcohol cleanser at the sink, 28% appeared clean, and 64% drained completely. Twenty-five (64%) of the sink samples grew Enterobacteriaceae on CHROMagar KPC, sixteen (41%) of which were clinically non-susceptible to ertapenem. Seven of the 39 sampled sinks (18%) produced Enterobacteriaceae that were resistant to all three antibiotic classes tested. Several facilities and sink characteristics were associated with CRE. Sinks and drains can serve as undetected reservoirs for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Control and remediation of such environments will require both systemic strategies and physical improvements to clinical environments.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35113948 PMCID: PMC8812900 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263297
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Antibiotic resistance patterns of 39 sinks from 37 healthcare facilities in Sindh Pakistan.
| N | % | |
|---|---|---|
| 25 |
| |
| | 10 | |
| Non-susceptible to ertapenem | 8 |
|
| Non-susceptible to ceftriaxone | 7 |
|
| Non-susceptible to ciprofloxacin | 1 |
|
| Total coliforms that screened positive on CHROMagar KPC | 15 | |
| Non-susceptible to ertapenem | 8 |
|
| Non-susceptible to ceftriaxone | 13 |
|
| Non-susceptible to ciprofloxacin | 13 |
|
Association between facility and sink characteristics and screening positive for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae growth on CHROMagar KPC in 39 sinks from 37 healthcare facilities in Sindh Pakistan.
| All facilities | Sinks with ertapenem-resistant growth | p-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N = 39 | % of total | N positive | % positive | ||
|
| |||||
| Care Level | 0.754 | ||||
| Primary | 34 | 87% | 22 | 65% | |
| Secondary | 4 | 10% | 2 | 50% | |
| Tertiary | 1 | 3% | 1 | 100% | |
| Facility water source |
| ||||
| Piped from off-site source | 25 | 64% | 20 | 80% | |
| Borehole | 10 | 26% | 3 | 30% | |
| Tanker truck | 4 | 10% | 2 | 50% | |
| Facility has hand hygiene stations besides main sink | 3 | 8% | 0 | 0% |
|
| No separate hand hygiene stations | 36 | 92% | 25 | 69% | |
|
| |||||
| Sink location | 0.186 | ||||
| General ward | 7 | 19% | 6 | 86% | |
| Dispensary | 7 | 19% | 6 | 86% | |
| Outpatient clinic | 22 | 59% | 11 | 50% | |
| Other | 1 | 3% | 1 | 100% | |
| Water available at sink | 25 | 68% | 18 | 72% |
|
| Water unavailable | 12 | 32% | 5 | 42% | |
| Soap/alcohol cleanser available at sink | 20 | 51% | 11 | 55% | 0.256 |
| Soap/alcohol cleanser unavailable | 19 | 49% | 14 | 74% | |
| Water available and soap/alcohol available at sink | 9 | 25% | 6 | 67% | 0.847 |
| Water and soap/alcohol unavailable | 27 | 75% | 17 | 63% | |
| Drying implements available at sink | 2 | 5% | 0 | 0% | 0.053 |
| Drying implements unavailable at sink | 37 | 95% | 25 | 68% | |
| Sink is reported to be cleaned by staff | 35 | 90% | 23 | 66% | 0.443 |
| Not cleaned | 4 | 10% | 2 | 50% | |
| Sink appears clean | 11 | 28% | 4 | 36% |
|
| Sink does not appear clean | 28 | 72% | 21 | 75% | |
| Sink drains completely | 25 | 64% | 15 | 60% | 0.620 |
| Sink does not drain | 14 | 36% | 10 | 71% | |
| Tap handles stop flow of water completely | 26 | 67% | 17 | 65% | 0.867 |
| Water drips | 13 | 33% | 8 | 62% | |
| Cleaning products disposed of in sink | 24 | 62% | 16 | 67% | 0.618 |
| Cleaning products not disposed of in sink | 15 | 38% | 9 | 60% | |
| Human waste disposed of in sink | 2 | 5% | 2 | 100% | 0.325 |
| Human waste not disposed of in sink | 37 | 95% | 23 | 62% | |
| Counter around sink | 6 | 15% | 6 | 100% |
|
| No counter around sink | 33 | 85% | 19 | 58% | |
| Sink water used to clean room and sinks | 14 | 36% | 11 | 79% | 0.134 |
| Sink water not used to clean | 25 | 64% | 14 | 56% | |
| Medical supplies washed in sink | 3 | 8% | 2 | 67% | 0.770 |
| Medical supplies not washed in sink | 36 | 92% | 23 | 64% | |
| Sink water used as patient drinking water | 1 | 3% | 1 | 100% | 0.680 |
| Sink water not used as drinking water | 38 | 97% | 24 | 63% | |
Bold = statistically significant p<0.05. Exact test mid-p value was used for all analyses.
*This variable contains missingness.
Fig 1A) Sink with straight drainpipe with leak at floor. B) Dirty sink and room. C) Sink with a pipe disconnected both at drain and floor, with water spilling directly onto the floor.