Justin T Henthorn1, Serena DeBeer1. 1. Max Planck Institute for Chemical Energy Conversion, Stiftstrasse 34-36, D-45470 Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany.
Abstract
Selenium X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) has found widespread use in investigations of Se-containing materials, geochemical processes, and biologically active sites. In contrast to sulfur Kβ X-ray emission spectroscopy (XES), which has been found to contain electronic and structural information complementary to S XAS, Se Kβ XES remains comparatively underexplored. Herein, we present the first Se Valence-to-Core (VtC) XES studies of reduced Se-containing compounds and FeSe dimers. Se VtC XES is found to be sensitive to changes in covalent Se bonding interactions (Se-Se/Se-C/Se-H bonding) while being relatively insensitive to changes in Fe oxidation states as selenide bridges in FeSe dimers ([Fe2Se2]2+ vs [Fe2Se2]+). In contrast, Se Kβ HERFD XAS is demonstrated to be quite sensitive to changes in the Fe oxidation state with Se Kβ HERFD XAS demonstrating experimental resolution equivalent to Kα HERFD XAS. Additionally, computational studies reveal both Se VtC XES and XAS to be sensitive to selenium protonation in FeSe complexes.
Selenium X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) has found widespread use in investigations of Se-containing materials, geochemical processes, and biologically active sites. In contrast to sulfur Kβ X-ray emission spectroscopy (XES), which has been found to contain electronic and structural information complementary to S XAS, Se Kβ XES remains comparatively underexplored. Herein, we present the first Se Valence-to-Core (VtC) XES studies of reduced Se-containing compounds and FeSe dimers. Se VtC XES is found to be sensitive to changes in covalent Se bonding interactions (Se-Se/Se-C/Se-H bonding) while being relatively insensitive to changes in Fe oxidation states as selenide bridges in FeSe dimers ([Fe2Se2]2+ vs [Fe2Se2]+). In contrast, Se Kβ HERFD XAS is demonstrated to be quite sensitive to changes in the Fe oxidation state with Se Kβ HERFD XAS demonstrating experimental resolution equivalent to Kα HERFD XAS. Additionally, computational studies reveal both Se VtC XES and XAS to be sensitive to selenium protonation in FeSe complexes.
Selenium
is an essential trace element that plays pivotal functions
in biological[1−3] and environmental sciences.[4] Additionally, selenium is a semiconductor with applications in the
fields of nanoscience[5,6] and photovoltaics.[7−9] Other applications include energy storage[10,11] and glass manufacturing. Across many of these applications, there
is great utility for an element-selective spectroscopy to better understand
the electronic and chemical structure of the relevant selenium species. 77Se NMR has proven useful in characterizing the chemical environment
of Se;[12−19] however, the requirement of diamagnetic samples and solution-based
measurements limits its broad applicability, as well as constrains
its potential for in situ experiments. Se X-ray absorption
spectroscopy has been implemented in some of these applications.[20−25] Se XAS is directly analogous to S XAS, which has recently been coupled
with S XES as a complementary probe of electronic and chemical structure.[26,27] In comparison, Se XES remains largely unexplored. Herein, we report
the first Se Kβ XES study of reduced Se compounds, including
biologically relevant [Fe2Se2] complexes.
Experimental
Methods
Sample Preparation
Li2Se and [Et4N][SeH] were synthesized following published
procedures.[100,101] KSeCN and gray (hexagonal) elemental
Se (Se0) were purchased from Sigma and used as received.
The β-diketiminate-supported iron dimer complexes L2Fe2Se2 and [K(THF)6][L2Fe2Se2]·2THF (L = {HC[C(CH3)N-(2,6-Pr2C6H3)]2}1–) were prepared according
to literature methods.[28] All synchrotron
measurements were performed on solid samples diluted in BN (Sigma,
dried under vacuum for 2 h at 120 °C) to ∼1% Se by weight
and finely ground with mortar and pestle, except KSeCN that was measured
as a frozen 1 mM solution in distilled H2O. The solid samples
were packed into 1 mm thick aluminum spacers and sealed with a 38
μm Kapton tape, while the KSeCN sample was prepared in a Delrin
pinhole solution cell with a 38 μm Kapton tape window and frozen
in liquid nitrogen.
Data Collection and Processing
All
presented data were measured at beamline ID-26 of the European Synchrotron
Radiation Facility (ESRF) with the storage ring operating at 6 GeV
and injection currents of 90 mA in a 16-bunch filling mode. A Si(3
1 1) double-crystal monochromator was used upstream for incident energy
selection. The monochromatic incident energy was calibrated to the
absorption maximum of gray elemental selenium (12 659.8 eV).
The beam size was 500 × 100 (horizontal × vertical) μm2, providing a flux density of ∼1 × 1012 ph/s. Selenium X-ray absorption spectra were measured simultaneously
in total fluorescence yield (TFY) and Kβ1 HERFD detection
modes. For the emission measurements, a 1 m radius Johann-type XES
spectrometer was used, equipped with four spherically bent Ge(8 8
0) analyzer crystals aligned on intersecting Rowland circles. The
XES spectrometer was internally calibrated using the emission lines
of gray elemental selenium (Kβ1 = 12 492.6
eV; Kβ3 = 12 498.0 eV; Kβ2 = 12 655.1 eV). Kβ1-detected XAS and Kβ
XES data collection was performed using a dead-time corrected silicon
drift diode detector (Ketek) aligned on the Rowland circle. Attenuation
of the fluorescence signal was reduced by placing a He-filled flight
path between the sample, the analyzer crystals, and the detector.
Measurements were performed in a liquid helium flow cryostat maintained
at ∼20 K.Se Kβ HERFD XAS was collected over an
energy range of 12 640–12 700 eV in 0.1 eV steps.
The incident energy was set to 13 000 eV to collect nonresonant
Se Kβ XES. Emission scans were collected varying the scan parameters
in three different ranges: 12 485–12 510, 12 505–12 640,
and 12 640–12 670 eV using energy step sizes
of 0.5, 1.0, and 0.5 eV, respectively. The total energy resolution
was estimated to be ∼1.5 eV based on the full width at half-maximum
of the elastic peaks. The width of the elastic peak (ΔE) results from a convolution of the spectrometer and monochromator
resolution.Radiation damage studies were performed on each
individual sample
by collecting successive fast energy range XAS scans (10 s/scan) at
a single spot on the sample, averaging across multiple spots to increase
the signal-to-noise ratio and better observe spectral changes indicative
of damage. All samples eventually revealed damage in the beam. The
maximum exposure time per spot to collect undamaged data on all samples
was 30–120 s (applied to both XAS and XES measurements). The
presented data comprises an average of ∼10 XAS and ∼6
XES scans for each compound (each scan corresponding to a fresh spot
on the sample). Total collection times for XAS and XES measurements
were approximately 20 and 60 min per sample, respectively. The long
XES measurement time (relative to the short exposure time per spot)
is due to slow motor stepping across the large spectrometer energy
window (ca. 175 eV). Fast shutters were used to protect the sample
during motor stepping, maintaining the maximum exposure time threshold
per spot for undamaged data.Individual scans showing no evidence
of radiation damage were first
averaged with the PyMCA software package.[29] XAS spectra were background corrected and normalized by setting
the edge jump to 1. Experimental spectra were fit in an energy range
from 12 640 to 12 670 eV as a sum of 1–3 pseudo-Voigt
functions in the pre-edge region and 3–5 pure Gaussian functions
in the edge region using an iterative least-squares Matlab script.
In all cases, the fits converged to pre-edge pseudo-Voigt functions
with ≤30% Lorentzian composition. All energies and areas reported
are from the corresponding fits, with pre-edge areas taken as the
sum of the areas of the pre-edge functions multiplied by 100. Edge
energies are reported as the white line maxima and pre-edge energies
are reported as intensity-weighted average of the pre-edge fitting
functions.XES spectra were normalized to the integrated intensity
of the
Kβ1,3 mainlines (12 490–12 510
eV). The intensities and energy positions of Kβ2 XES
data were extracted by modeling the experimental line shapes with
pseudo-Voigt functions using an iterative least-squares Matlab script.
All energies (intensity-weighted averages) and areas are reported
from the corresponding fits, with areas taken as the sum of the areas
of the fitting functions multiplied by 100 000.
Computational Details
All geometry
optimizations and ground-state and TDDFT[30−32] calculations
were executed using ORCA[33,34] version 4.1. Computations
were performed using the hybrid TPSSh[35,36] functional
with the D3BJ[37,38] dispersion correction and CPCM[39−41] solvation model. The ZORA[42,43] relativistic approximation
was used and employed the relativistically contracted def2 Ahlrichs[44,45] basis set. A triple-ζ ZORA-def2-TZVP basis set was used for
all Se, S, Fe, and N atoms, while a double-ζ def2-SVP basis
set was used for all other atoms. The RIJCOSX[46,47] approximation was used to speed up Coulombic and exchange integrals.
For the Fe dimer complexes discussed in this work, appropriate antiferromagnetic
ground states were achieved starting from a “high spin”
ferromagnetic solution and employing the spinflip keyword to access
the broken symmetry solution. In the case of Li2Se, a [Li8Se]6+ model was employed using coordinates from
a recently reported crystal structure (ICSD 1684308). Additionally,
a geometry-optimized linear HSe(Se)6SeH compound was employed
as a model of Se0 and the VtC XES spectrum was calculated
from the two central Se atoms. Calculations for all other compounds
employed geometry-optimized molecular models.Computational
core-level spectroscopy for XES was carried out by a ground-state
DFT procedure, where transition energies are based on energy differences
between one-electron Kohn–Sham orbitals, as previously reported.[48] The hybrid TDDFT calculations were performed
using 100–400 roots (depending on the system) to ensure the
maximum of the rising edge was calculated. Se XAS and XES spectra
were plotted with applied broadenings of 2.0 and 5.0 eV (fwhm) and
shifted by constant values of −77.3 and −77.0 eV, respectively.
Calculated Se XAS spectra were normalized by dividing by 5.3 to reproduce
the pre-edge intensities observed experimentally for the [Fe2Se2] complexes (n = 1, 2), and calculated Se XES spectra were normalized
by dividing by 120 000 to reproduce the intensities observed
experimentally for the organoselenide series. Sample input files for
calculations, as well as coordinates for all model systems, can be
found in the Supporting Information.
Results and Discussion
Se Kβ
XES
Se Kβ XES corresponds
to the decay processes of Se 3p → 1s and 4p → 1s emission
events (Figure ).
The 3p → 1s emission event is dominated by 3p spin–orbit
coupling (SOC), splitting into Kβ1 (3p3/2 → 1s) and Kβ3 (3p1/2 →
1s) transitions. The 4p → 1s emission Kβ2 is
ca. 150 eV higher in energy and represents the valence-to-core transitions.
As such, the Kβ2 is dominated by the bonding interactions
of the Se photoabsorber.
Figure 1
Full Se Kβ XES spectrum of gray elemental
selenium, including
the Kβ1,3 mainline and Kβ2 valence-to-core
regions. Inset shows the Kβ2 region in greater detail.
Full Se Kβ XES spectrum of gray elemental
selenium, including
the Kβ1,3 mainline and Kβ2 valence-to-core
regions. Inset shows the Kβ2 region in greater detail.
Se Kβ1,3 Mainline
The Kβ1,3 region of the Kβ
XES spectrum is
split by the 3p core-hole SOC to give a spectral shape similar to
S Kα XES,[49] albeit with much larger
splitting of the Kβ1,3 lines (∼5.1 eV for
Se Kβ1,3 compared to ∼1.2 eV for S Kα1,2), consistent with the larger SOC of Se relative to S. The
analogy of second-row transition-metal Kβ XES to first-row transition-metal
Kα XES has previously been demonstrated.[50] Analogous to S Kα XES, the Se Kβ1,3 mainline region is anticipated to be sensitive to the relative oxidation
state of selenium, though comparatively less sensitive than S Kα
XES due to greater shielding of the nucleus by the Se 3d orbitals. Figure shows a comparison
of the Se Kβ1,3 mainline spectra of several reduced
forms of Se: [Fe2Se2] complexes (n = 1, 2) and hydroselenide (all
formally SeII–) as well as elemental selenium (Se0). Within the resolution of the experiment, all four spectra
are identical, consistent with DFT calculations (one-electron method, Figure S1) that predict at most a shift of 100
meV in the 3p to 1s transition energies. Even DFT calculations for
the more oxidized compounds SeO32– and
SeO42– (SeIV and SeVI, respectively) suggest only modest shifts in the 3p to 1s transition
energy, with a maximum difference of ∼0.3 eV (from Se0 to SeO42–, Figure S2). Overall, these results reveal the Se Kβ1,3 mainline to be much less sensitive to the formal oxidation state
than S Kα XES (ΔE = 1.43 eV[49] from Na2SO4 to ZnS).
Figure 2
Se Kβ
mainline (Kβ1,3) comparison of four
reduced selenium compounds: [Fe2Se2]2+ (blue), [Fe2Se2]+ (purple), [Et4N][SeH] (red), and elemental selenium (black).
Se Kβ
mainline (Kβ1,3) comparison of four
reduced selenium compounds: [Fe2Se2]2+ (blue), [Fe2Se2]+ (purple), [Et4N][SeH] (red), and elemental selenium (black).
Se Kβ2 Valence-to-Core
The Se Kβ2 XES spectra (hereafter referred to
as VtC XES) of Li2Se, [Et4N][SeH], KSeCN, and
gray elemental selenium (Se0) are presented in Figure . It is immediately
clear that there are dramatic and distinct changes across the series
of compounds. Starting with the ionic Li2Se (Figure , blue), the VtC XES spectrum
reveals an intense symmetric feature centered at 12 655 eV.
Addition of a single covalent bond to selenium results in a distinctly
asymmetric VtC XES spectrum, as evidenced by [Et4N][SeH]
(Figure , red) and
KSeCN (Figure , green),
with the more intense feature shifted to higher energy (ca. 12 656
and 12 657 eV, respectively) and a significant shoulder shifted
to lower energy (ca. 12 653 eV). Finally, the fully covalent
Se0 VtC XES spectrum (Figure , black) reveals a broadened, slightly asymmetric
emission feature of lower intensity centered around 12 655
eV. These spectra can easily be understood from a simplistic molecular
orbital (MO) diagram picture, as detailed below.
Figure 3
Background-subtracted
experimental (left) and DFT-calculated (right)
Se VtC XES spectra of Li2Se (light blue), [Et4N][SeH] (red), KSeCN (green), and elemental selenium (black). Individual
calculated transitions are shown as vertical sticks, while line-broadened
spectra are shown as curves.
Background-subtracted
experimental (left) and DFT-calculated (right)
Se VtC XES spectra of Li2Se (light blue), [Et4N][SeH] (red), KSeCN (green), and elemental selenium (black). Individual
calculated transitions are shown as vertical sticks, while line-broadened
spectra are shown as curves.Starting at the atomic limit of selenide (Se2–),
the three 4p donor orbitals (4p,
4p, and 4p) are degenerate, resulting in a single, narrow VtC XES transition
in Li2Se (Figure S3, right).
Upon protonation to form hydroselenide (SeH1–),
the more positive charge on Se (2– to 1−) will result
in a stabilization of the 1s orbital (due to increased Zeff), resulting in a shift of the 4p-to-1s transition
to higher energy (Figure S3, left). Additionally,
mixing of a Se 4p orbital with the H 1s orbital results in a bonding
MO that is filled and stabilized relative to the Se 4p energy level,
as well as an unfilled antibonding MO that is destabilized relative
to the Se 4p energy level. Thus, the Se VtC XES spectrum will have
two main transitions, one shifted to lower energy (relative to the
Se2– spectrum) arising from the Se–H bonding
interaction, and the second transition shifted to higher energy (relative
to the Se2– spectrum) arising from the two remaining
nonbonding Se 4p orbitals. The relative intensity of the nonbonding
transition will be ∼2/3 the intensity of the Se2– spectrum, while the Se–H transition will be less than half
of the nonbonding transition (as the overlap of the bonding MO with
the Se 1s orbital has decreased relative to the nonbonding Se 4p atomic-like
orbital). A similar MO picture can be drawn for SeCN1– (Figure S4), resulting in qualitatively
similar transitions arising from the nonbonding Se 4p orbitals and
Se–Cσ bonding orbitals, with the expectation
that the more electronegative CN group will further stabilize the
Se 1s orbital resulting in a shift of the Se 4p-to-1s transition to
even higher energy, and the stronger Se–C bond will result
in a shift to lower energy of the Se–Cσ bonding
transitions. Additionally, the Se p orbital can mix with both the
CNσ (p-parentage) and CNσ* (s-parentage)
orbitals, giving rise to two bonding transitions in the Se VtC XES.
These simple pen-and-paper calculations are borne out by our DFT calculations
(Figure ), which well-match
the experimental results.For elemental selenium, the simple
MO picture becomes slightly
more complicated due its oligomeric nature (see Figure S5 for MO diagram of HSeSeSeH as a simple model). However,
we can assume a set of filled Se–Se bonding orbitals (and corresponding
empty antibonding orbitals), as well as a set of largely nonbonding
orbitals, giving rise to two broad regions in the Se VtC XES spectrum,
matching well the experimentally observed asymmetric Se0 VtC XES spectrum (Figure , black). DFT calculations of a similar model system (see Section ) well reproduce
the experimental spectrum, evidencing the more complicated MO picture
due to a large amount of covalent mixing with neighboring Se centers
in the oligomeric structure (compare calculated individual transitions
shown as black vertical sticks in Figure ).Quantitatively, we can also observe
that the overall intensity
(total area, determined from fitting the experimental spectra, see Experimental Section) of the Se VtC XES spectra
decreases in the order Se2– > HSe1– > NCSe1– > Se0, corresponding
to increasing
covalent bonding interactions (Table , Figures S6–S8).
This inverse correlation of Se VtC XES intensity to bonding covalency
is consistent with the mechanism of VtC XES intensity, which is proportional
to the transition dipole integral (the “allowedness”
of the transition), the donor–acceptor orbital overlap (Se
4p/1s), and the number of electrons in the donor orbitals. As the
4p → 1s transition is formally dipole allowed, the bulk of
the intensity from these closed-shell main-group Se compounds arises
from the 4p/1s orbital overlap. At the ionic limit of Li2Se, the Se 4p orbitals are strongly localized to the Se center, maximizing
the Se 4p–Se 1s orbital overlap. As covalent bonds are formed
between the photoabsorbing selenium and other atoms (H, C, Se), the
generated bonding MOs of Se 4p-parentage are less localized to the
Se, resulting in decreased Se 4p/1s overlap and thus decreasing Se
VtC XES spectral intensities. In the case of Se0, the formal
loss of electrons relative to the selenide compounds results in further
contraction of the Se orbitals, additionally contributing to the decrease
in VtC intensity.
Table 1
Se VtC XES Energies and Areas
sample
energya (eV)
area
Li2Se
12 654.54
960
[Et4N][SeH]
12 654.90
820
KSeCN
12 655.25
740
Se0
12 654.42
730
[Fe2Se2]2+
12 654.76
890
[Fe2Se2]+
12 654.70
930
Area-weighted average
of fitting
functions.
Area-weighted average
of fitting
functions.Turning now to
FeSe clusters, we examine the effects of the Fe
oxidation state on the Se VtC XES spectra of a μ-Se bridge in
β-diketiminate-supported [Fe2Se2] complexes (n = 1, 2).
From our simple MO picture developed through analysis of the Se VtC
XES spectra above, we can qualitatively predict that the Se VtC XES
spectra of the FeSe dimer complexes should lie somewhere between the
Li2Se and Se0 spectra, both in terms of lineshape
and overall intensity, as the Fe–Se bonding interactions are
assumed to be more covalent than the highly ionic Li2Se,
but less covalent than elemental selenium. Indeed, as experimentally
observed in Figure , the spectra of the FeSe dimers are intermediate in intensity between
Li2Se and Se0, while lacking the large asymmetry
present in [Et4N][SeH] and KSeCN, consistent with two Fe–Se
bonding interactions. Interestingly, there is little obvious change
in the Se VtC XES spectrum upon one-electron redox of the dimer. DFT
calculations reproduce this observation, with the mixed-valent dimer
[Fe2Se2]+ having only slightly increased
intensity relative to the diferric complex [Fe2Se2]2+. Experimentally, the [Fe2Se2]+ complex also exhibits a slightly more intense Se VtC
spectrum than the [Fe2Se2]2+ complex
(area = 930 for [Fe2Se2]+ vs 890
for [Fe2Se2]2+). This slight increase
in intensity for [Fe2Se2]+ relative
to [Fe2Se2]2+ is again consistent
with the decreased covalency of the Fe–Se bonds in the reduced
dimer.
Figure 4
Background-subtracted experimental (left) and DFT-calculated (right)
Se VtC XES spectra of [Fe2Se2]2+ (blue),
[Fe2Se2]+ (purple), and [Et4N][SeH] (red). Individual calculated transitions are shown as vertical
sticks, while line-broadened spectra are shown as curves.
Background-subtracted experimental (left) and DFT-calculated (right)
Se VtC XES spectra of [Fe2Se2]2+ (blue),
[Fe2Se2]+ (purple), and [Et4N][SeH] (red). Individual calculated transitions are shown as vertical
sticks, while line-broadened spectra are shown as curves.
Kβ HERFD XAS
To maximize the
information content available through measuring Se Kβ XES, we
also explored Se Kβ high-energy-resolution fluorescence detection
XAS (or Kβ HERFD XAS) using the same experimental setup. Analogous
to Se Kα HERFD XAS[21,22,51] (which uses the Kα1 emission), Se Kβ HERFD
XAS selectively measures the Kβ1 emission maximum
across the Se absorption edge. In the case of Kα HERFD XAS,
experimental resolution is improved approximately two-fold compared
to partial fluorescence yield measurements due to the significantly
longer-lived 2p core-hole lifetime relative to the 1s core-hole lifetime.
Moving to Kβ HERFD XAS, the even longer-lived 3p core-hole lifetime[52] similarly could further improve the spectral
resolution relative to the standard PFY measurement; however, additional
multielectron decay pathways (i.e., Coster–Krönig
transitions) could limit any improvement in resolution relative to
Kα HERFD XAS. Experimentally, we find that Kα and Kβ
HERFD XAS exhibit nearly identical spectral resolution, as shown in Figure S11. Thus, the intrinsic increased resolution
due to the longer 3p core-hole lifetime is only moderately diminished
via additional decay pathways, resulting in an overall similar spectral
resolution to the Kα HERFD measurement. However, the Kβ
emission is approximately an order of magnitude lower in intensity
than the Kα emission, and thus Kβ HERFD XAS will likely
require longer collection times to achieve the same signal-to-noise
ratio as Kα HERFD XAS, particularly with low-concentration samples.The Kβ HERFD XAS spectra of the diferric [Fe2Se2]2+ and mixed-valent [Fe2Se2]+ complexes are presented in Figure . As anticipated, the diferric complex [Fe2Se2]2+ reveals an intense pre-edge feature
(area = 385) around 12 653 eV, consistent with the more covalent
Fe–Se interactions and high d-hole count (10) in the oxidized
dimer core (Table ). Upon one-electron reduction to the mixed-valent [Fe2Se2]+ complex, the pre-edge feature decreases
in intensity (area = 260) and the rising edge shifts to lower energy,
with the white line maximum decreasing from 12 655.56 eV in
[Fe2Se2]2+ to 12 664.99 eV
in [Fe2Se2]+, a net change of −0.57
eV. The decrease in pre-edge intensity and shift to lower energy of
the rising edge are both consistent with a less covalent Fe–Se
interaction in the reduced dimer (as well as a decrease in d-hole
count to 9) and overall destabilization of the 1s Se orbital due to
a lower Zeff. We note that the pre-edge
intensity of the diferric complex [Fe2Se2]2+ (area = 385) is consistent with the previously measured
Kα HERFD XAS spectra of the diferric [Et4N]2[Fe2Se2(SPh)4] (370) as well as the Se2B spectrum of resting-state
FeMoco in nitrogenase (385 ± 20), which has been assigned as
an antiferromagnetically coupled diferric site.[21] The present results further support this assignment.
Figure 5
Experimental
(left) and TDDFT-calculated (right) Kβ1 HERFD XAS
spectra of [Fe2Se2]2+ (blue), [Fe2Se2]+ (purple), and
[SeH]1– (red).
Table 2
Se Kβ1 HERFD XAS
Edge Energies, Pre-edge Energies and Areas, and Relative Fe 3d-Manifold
Energies
edge
pre-edge
sample
energy (eV)
energy (eV)
area
|δd|a (eV)
[Fe2Se2]2+
12 665.56
12 657.70
385
7.86
[Fe2Se2]+
12 664.99
12 657.73
260
7.26
[Et4N][SeH]
12 663.57
12 659.47
260
Se0
12 667.72
12 660.12
740
|δd| = |(pre-edge
energy) – (edge energy)|.
Experimental
(left) and TDDFT-calculated (right) Kβ1 HERFD XAS
spectra of [Fe2Se2]2+ (blue), [Fe2Se2]+ (purple), and
[SeH]1– (red).|δd| = |(pre-edge
energy) – (edge energy)|.The dramatic change in pre-edge intensity in the Kβ HERFD
XAS spectrum upon one-electron redox of the [Fe2Se2] core, in contrast to the negligible
intensity difference observed in the Kβ XES spectra, requires
additional investigation and discussion. We turn now to DFT calculations
to better elucidate the disparity.
Theoretical
Investigations of [Fe2SSe] and [Fe2S(SeH)] Systems
To better understand the
dramatic differences in the effects of oxidation-state changes between
Se VtC XES (where there is minimal effect) and XAS (where there is
significant effect) in our measured [Fe2Se2] dimers, we have computationally investigated
a similar set of fictitious [Fe2SSe(SMe)4] (n = 2, 3) complexes.
This fictitious dimer system exhibits nearly identical Se VtC XES
and XAS spectra to the experimentally investigated compounds (Figure S12), demonstrating the minimal perturbative
effect of substituting the bridging (S vs Se) and terminal (thiolate
vs nacnac) ligands, and the accompanying geometric changes, on the
properties of the Se VtC XES and XAS spectra. Analysis of the Se 4p
orbitals via the intrinsic atom orbitals and intrinsic bonding orbitals
(IAOIBO) method[53] reveals the Fe–Se
bonding orbitals are on average 75.1% Se composition (Löwdin)
in the oxidized dimer and 76.4% Se composition in the mixed-valent
dimer, while the remaining nonbonding orbitals are 85.6 and 86.6%
Se, respectively (Figures S13 and S14).
These MO analyses are consistent with the experimental Se VtC XES
spectra of the [Fe2Se2] complexes (n = 1, 2), wherein minimal change
in Se composition of the Fe–Se bonding and Se nonbonding MOs
upon one-electron redox results in a correspondingly minimal change
in the VtC spectra.In contrast, analysis of the Fe 3d manifold
reveals a similarly small change (in absolute terms) of the Se contributions
to the MOs upon one-electron redox, from an average of 6.44% Se p
character in the oxidized dimer to 5.28% (Δ = −1.16%)
in the mixed-valent dimer, well mirroring the change in the Se orbital
contribution to the Fe–Se bonding MOs upon one-electron redox
from 75.1 to 76.4% (Δ = +1.3%). In the case of the Fe–Se
bonding MOs, the change in the Se orbital contribution has a negligible
effect on the Se VtC XES spectra as the Se contribution (and by extension
the Se 4p/1s orbital overlap) only changes in relative terms by ∼2%;
however, the same absolute magnitude change (ca. 1%) in Se orbital
contribution to the Fe 3d manifold results in a more dramatic change
in the XAS pre-edge intensity, as the relative change in the Se orbital
contribution is more substantial in the Fe 3d-manifold MOs (ca. 20%).
This implies that the significant intensity of the XAS pre-edge feature
in the diferric complex is dominated by the large number of acceptor
orbitals (10 half-filled Fe 3d orbitals) rather than a large Fe/Se
orbital overlap, and thus the large decrease in XAS pre-edge intensity
upon one-electron reduction to the mixed-valent dimer is driven less
by the decrease in the number of acceptor orbitals (9 down from 10,
a factor of 0.9) and more by the large relative decrease in the Se
p orbital contribution (5.28% down from 6.44%, a factor of 0.82) and
by extension of the Se 4p/1s overlap. Indeed, the product of these
two ratios (0.9 × 0.82 = 0.739) well approximates the decrease
in pre-edge intensity experimentally observed upon one-electron reduction
(260/385 = 0.675). Overall, it is the relatively ionic nature of these
orbitals that minimizes the effects of oxidation-state changes in
the Se VtC XES spectra, in contrast to the large changes observed
in the corresponding Se XAS spectra.While Se VtC XES shows
little sensitivity to the Fe oxidation state
in FeSe complexes, we have shown experimentally that it is sensitive
to selenium protonation (see Section ). Here, we further investigate computationally
the utility of Se VtC XES and XAS as probes of selenium protonation
in FeSe complexes through protonation of our fictitious [Fe2SSe] models to yield the corresponding
[Fe2S(SeH)]( complexes.
In the VtC XES spectra (Figure ), protonation of the bridging selenide yields new emission
features arising from the Se–Hσ donor orbital,
which appear at lower energy (ca. 12 653 eV) concomitant with
the loss of intensity at higher energy (ca. 12 655 eV). These
changes are consistent with the loss of the formal Se lone-pair transition
upon protonation. Similar to the unprotonated system, the calculated
Se VtC XES spectra reveal no sensitivity to one-electron redox, indicating
VtC XES to be a more selective probe of selenium protonation (vide infra). In the XAS spectrum, protonation of the selenide
bridge results in a decrease in the pre-edge feature and the appearance
of a new absorption feature in the rising edge assigned to the Se
1s → Se–Hσ* transition. Similar trends
in the Fe oxidation state occur with the [Fe2S(SeH)]( series, with decreasing pre-edge intensity
with decreasing Fe oxidation state, as well as shifts in the rising
edge to lower energy with decreasing oxidation state. Additionally,
the Se–Hσ* transition also shifts to lower
energy with decreasing Fe oxidation state, consistent with destabilization
of the Se 1s orbital due to a higher Zeff. These results reveal that both VtC XES and XAS are sensitive to
Se protonation in FeSe dimers, while only XAS is sensitive to changes
in redox levels. As protonation often accompanies one-electron reduction
in biological cofactors (proton-coupled electron transfer, PCET),[54,55] Se XES would more clearly evidence a protonation event regardless
of any redox change, while Se XAS would reveal the convolution of
the protonation event and the redox change, potentially resulting
in the protonation event being obscured. For this hypothetical PCET
event, the XAS experiment may be difficult to interpret in isolation,
but combined with XES the two effects could be more easily deconvoluted.
Figure 6
Calculated
Se VtC XES (left) and XAS (right) spectra of fictitious
[Fe2SSe]2+ (solid blue), [Fe2SSe]+ (solid red), [Fe2S(SeH)]3+ (dashed
blue), and [Fe2S(SeH)]2+ (dashed red). Individual
transitions are shown as vertical sticks. Inset shows MOs corresponding
to the Fe–Seσ donor transition and the Se–Hσ donor transition for the [Fe2S(SeH)]2+ complex.
Calculated
Se VtC XES (left) and XAS (right) spectra of fictitious
[Fe2SSe]2+ (solid blue), [Fe2SSe]+ (solid red), [Fe2S(SeH)]3+ (dashed
blue), and [Fe2S(SeH)]2+ (dashed red). Individual
transitions are shown as vertical sticks. Inset shows MOs corresponding
to the Fe–Seσ donor transition and the Se–Hσ donor transition for the [Fe2S(SeH)]2+ complex.
Conclusions
Through investigation of a series of reduced Se compounds, we have
demonstrated the sensitivity of Se VtC XES to changes in the covalent
bonding interactions of the photoabsorbing Se center. The observed
experimental changes can easily be rationalized through simple MO
analyses and are well-reproduced through DFT calculations. The Se
Kβ1,3 mainline region reveals negligible changes
in the reduced forms of Se investigated in this study (Se2– and Se0), which are also well-matched by simple DFT calculations.
Se VtC XES spectra of [Fe2Se2] dimers revealed minor sensitivity to changes in the Fe oxidation
state, in contrast to the high sensitivity of Se Kβ HERFD XAS.
Computational analyses reveal the source of these contrasting sensitivities
arises from the relatively ionic nature of the Fe–Se bonding
interactions. Additionally, the sensitivity of Se VtC XES to protonation
suggests a combined Se VtC XES/Kβ HERFD XAS approach could be
a powerful tool in elucidating protonation/alkylation of Se within
FeSe clusters, most notably in Se-substituted nitrogenase.[56,57] Furthermore, we have demonstrated that Se Kβ HERFD XAS exhibits
spectral resolution matching Se Kα HERFD XAS, and thus a single
experimental setup allows access to complementary Se VtC XES and HERFD
XAS measurements. Future studies will explore resonant measurements
as a means of enhancing sensitivity to changes in Se chemical and
electronic structure—analogous to recent Fe resonant X-ray
emission spectroscopic studies[58]—as well as the feasibility of laboratory-based
Se X-ray emission measurements.
Authors: Susan Nehzati; Natalia V Dolgova; Dimosthenis Sokaras; Thomas Kroll; Julien J H Cotelesage; Ingrid J Pickering; Graham N George Journal: Inorg Chem Date: 2018-08-22 Impact factor: 5.165
Authors: Stephanie A Schaefer; Ming Dong; Renee P Rubenstein; Wayne A Wilkie; Brian J Bahnson; Colin Thorpe; Sharon Rozovsky Journal: J Mol Biol Date: 2012-11-15 Impact factor: 5.469
Authors: Eric Block; Richard S Glass; Neil E Jacobsen; Sherida Johnson; Chethaka Kahakachchi; Rafal Kamiński; Alexandra Skowrońska; Harriet Totoe Boakye; Julian F Tyson; Peter C Uden Journal: J Agric Food Chem Date: 2004-06-16 Impact factor: 5.279