Literature DB >> 35112932

Physiological dead space during exercise in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Bryce N Balmain1,2, Andrew R Tomlinson1,2, James P MacNamara1,2, Satyam Sarma1,2, Benjamin D Levine1,2, Linda S Hynan3, Tony G Babb1,2.   

Abstract

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is associated with cardiopulmonary abnormalities that may increase physiological dead space to tidal volume (VD/VT) during exercise. However, studies have not corrected VD/VT for apparatus mechanical dead space (VDM), which may confound the accurate calculation of VD/VT. We evaluated whether calculating physiological dead space with (VD/VTVDM) and without (VD/VT) correcting for VDM impacts the interpretation of gas exchange efficiency during exercise in HFpEF. Fifteen HFpEF (age: 69 ± 6 yr; V̇o2peak: 1.34 ± 0.45 L/min) and 12 controls (70 ± 3 yr; V̇o2peak: 1.70 ± 0.51 L/min) were studied. Pulmonary gas exchange and arterial blood gases were analyzed at rest, submaximal (20 W for HFpEF and 40 W for controls), and peak exercise. VD/VT was calculated as [Formula: see text] - [Formula: see text]/[Formula: see text]. VD/VTVDM was calculated as [Formula: see text] - [Formula: see text]/[Formula: see text] - VDM/VT. VD/VT decreased from rest (HFpEF: 0.54 ± 0.07; controls: 0.32 ± 0.07) to submaximal exercise (HFpEF: 0.46 ± 0.07; controls: 0.25 ± 0.06) in both groups (P < 0.05), but remained stable (P > 0.05) thereafter to peak exercise (HFpEF: 0.46 ± 0.09; controls: 0.22 ± 0.05). In HFpEF, VD/VTVDM did not change (P = 0.58) from rest (0.29 ± 0.07) to submaximal exercise (0.29 ± 0.06), but increased (P = 0.02) thereafter to peak exercise (0.33 ± 0.06). In controls, VD/VTVDM remained stable such that no change was observed (P > 0.05) from rest (0.17 ± 0.06) to submaximal exercise (0.14 ± 0.06), or thereafter to peak exercise (0.14 ± 0.05). Calculating physiological dead space with and without a VDM correction yields quantitively and qualitatively different results, which could have impact on the interpretation of gas exchange efficiency in HFpEF. Further investigation is required to uncover the clinical consequences and the mechanism(s) explaining the increase in VD/VTVDM during exercise in HFpEF.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Calculating VD/VT with and without correcting for VDM yields quantitively and qualitatively different results, which could have an important impact on the interpretation of V/Q mismatch in HFpEF. The finding that V/Q mismatch and gas exchange efficiency worsened, as reflected by an increase in VD/VTVDM during exercise, has not been previously demonstrated in HFpEF. Thus, further studies are needed to investigate the mechanisms explaining the increase in VD/VTVDM during exercise in patients with HFpEF.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HFpEF; dead space; exercise; gas exchange inefficiency

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35112932      PMCID: PMC8897014          DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00786.2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  40 in total

1.  The role of the pulmonary vasculature in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Gregory D Lewis
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 2.  The multiple inert gas elimination technique (MIGET).

Authors:  Peter D Wagner
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Gas exchange and ventilation-perfusion relationships in the lung.

Authors:  Johan Petersson; Robb W Glenny
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 16.671

4.  Interaction of physiological mechanisms during exercise.

Authors:  K Wasserman; A L Van Kessel; G G Burton
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 3.531

5.  Spironolactone for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Bertram Pitt; Marc A Pfeffer; Susan F Assmann; Robin Boineau; Inder S Anand; Brian Claggett; Nadine Clausell; Akshay S Desai; Rafael Diaz; Jerome L Fleg; Ivan Gordeev; Brian Harty; John F Heitner; Christopher T Kenwood; Eldrin F Lewis; Eileen O'Meara; Jeffrey L Probstfield; Tamaz Shaburishvili; Sanjiv J Shah; Scott D Solomon; Nancy K Sweitzer; Song Yang; Sonja M McKinlay
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  RV Contractile Function and its Coupling to Pulmonary Circulation in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Stratification of Clinical Phenotypes and Outcomes.

Authors:  Marco Guazzi; Debra Dixon; Valentina Labate; Lauren Beussink-Nelson; Francesco Bandera; Michael J Cuttica; Sanijv J Shah
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-04-12

7.  Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure during exercise and long-term mortality in patients with suspected heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Stephan Dorfs; Wolfgang Zeh; Willibald Hochholzer; Nikolaus Jander; Rolf-Peter Kienzle; Burkert Pieske; Franz Josef Neumann
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Physiological dead space and arterial carbon dioxide contributions to exercise ventilatory inefficiency in patients with reduced or preserved ejection fraction heart failure.

Authors:  Erik H Van Iterson; Bruce D Johnson; Barry A Borlaug; Thomas P Olson
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2017-10-08       Impact factor: 15.534

9.  Ventilation-perfusion matching in chronic heart failure.

Authors:  A L Clark; M Volterrani; J W Swan; A J Coats
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  1995-03-03       Impact factor: 4.164

10.  Prognostic impact of Framingham heart failure criteria in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Ulrika Löfström; Camilla Hage; Gianluigi Savarese; Erwan Donal; Jean-Claude Daubert; Lars H Lund; Cecilia Linde
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2019-06-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.