Literature DB >> 35112158

Identification of vascular cues contributing to cancer cell stemness and function.

Saran Kumar1,2, Libat Bar-Lev3, Husni Sharife3, Myriam Grunewald3, Maxim Mogilevsky4, Tamar Licht3, Jermaine Goveia5, Federico Taverna5, Iddo Paldor6, Peter Carmeliet5, Eli Keshet7.   

Abstract

Glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) reside close to blood vessels (BVs) but vascular cues contributing to GSC stemness and the nature of GSC-BVs cross talk are not fully understood. Here, we dissected vascular cues influencing GSC gene expression and function to perfusion-based vascular cues, as well as to those requiring direct GSC-endothelial cell (EC) contacts. In light of our previous finding that perivascular tumor cells are metabolically different from tumor cells residing further downstream, cancer cells residing within a narrow, < 60 µm wide perivascular niche were isolated and confirmed to possess a superior tumor-initiation potential compared with those residing further downstream. To circumvent reliance on marker expression, perivascular GSCs were isolated from the respective locales based on their relative state of quiescence. Combined use of these procedures uncovered a large number of previously unrecognized differentially expressed GSC genes. We show that the unique metabolic milieu of the perivascular niche dominated by the highly restricted zone of mTOR activity is conducive for acquisition of GSC properties, primarily in the regulation of genes implicated in cell cycle control. A complementary role of vascular cues including those requiring direct glioma/EC contacts was revealed using glioma/EC co-cultures. Outstanding in the group of glioma cells impacted by nearby ECs were multiple genes responsible for maintaining GSCs in an undifferentiated state, a large fraction of which also relied on Notch-mediated signaling. Glioma-EC communication was found to be bidirectional, evidenced by extensive Notch-mediated EC reprogramming by contacting tumor cells, primarily metabolic EC reprogramming.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer stem cells; Endothelial cells; Glioblastoma; Notch signaling; Perivascular niche; Tumor vasculature

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35112158     DOI: 10.1007/s10456-022-09830-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angiogenesis        ISSN: 0969-6970            Impact factor:   10.658


  56 in total

Review 1.  Antiangiogenic therapy for glioblastoma: current status and future prospects.

Authors:  Tracy T Batchelor; David A Reardon; John F de Groot; Wolfgang Wick; Michael Weller
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  A perivascular niche for brain tumor stem cells.

Authors:  Christopher Calabrese; Helen Poppleton; Mehmet Kocak; Twala L Hogg; Christine Fuller; Blair Hamner; Eun Young Oh; M Waleed Gaber; David Finklestein; Meredith Allen; Adrian Frank; Ildar T Bayazitov; Stanislav S Zakharenko; Amar Gajjar; Andrew Davidoff; Richard J Gilbertson
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 3.  Ten-year survival in glioblastoma. A systematic review.

Authors:  Tomasz Tykocki; Mohamed Eltayeb
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 1.961

4.  Identification of human brain tumour initiating cells.

Authors:  Sheila K Singh; Cynthia Hawkins; Ian D Clarke; Jeremy A Squire; Jane Bayani; Takuichiro Hide; R Mark Henkelman; Michael D Cusimano; Peter B Dirks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-11-18       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Cancer stem cells: impact, heterogeneity, and uncertainty.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Magee; Elena Piskounova; Sean J Morrison
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 6.  Cancer stem cells in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Justin D Lathia; Stephen C Mack; Erin E Mulkearns-Hubert; Claudia L L Valentim; Jeremy N Rich
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 7.  Tumorigenic Cell Reprogramming and Cancer Plasticity: Interplay between Signaling, Microenvironment, and Epigenetics.

Authors:  Vittoria Poli; Luca Fagnocchi; Alessio Zippo
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 5.443

8.  Stem cell-associated heterogeneity in Glioblastoma results from intrinsic tumor plasticity shaped by the microenvironment.

Authors:  Anne Dirkse; Anna Golebiewska; Thomas Buder; Petr V Nazarov; Arnaud Muller; Suresh Poovathingal; Nicolaas H C Brons; Sonia Leite; Nicolas Sauvageot; Dzjemma Sarkisjan; Mathieu Seyfrid; Sabrina Fritah; Daniel Stieber; Alessandro Michelucci; Frank Hertel; Christel Herold-Mende; Francisco Azuaje; Alexander Skupin; Rolf Bjerkvig; Andreas Deutsch; Anja Voss-Böhme; Simone P Niclou
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 9.  Cancer Stem Cell Plasticity - A Deadly Deal.

Authors:  Archana P Thankamony; Kritika Saxena; Reshma Murali; Mohit Kumar Jolly; Radhika Nair
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2020-04-30

Review 10.  Tumour heterogeneity and cancer cell plasticity.

Authors:  Corbin E Meacham; Sean J Morrison
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Vascular Co-Option and Other Alternative Modalities of Growth of Tumor Vasculature in Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Domenico Ribatti; Francesco Pezzella
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 6.244

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.