| Literature DB >> 35111749 |
Juanshan Zheng1, Mei Du1, Jianbo Zhang1, Zeyi Liang1, Anum Ali Ahmad2, Jiahao Shen1, Ghasem Hosseini Salekdeh3, Xuezhi Ding1,4.
Abstract
Animals have adapted behavioral and physiological strategies to conserve energy during periods of adverse conditions. Hepatic glucose is one such adaptation used by grazing animals. While large vertebrates have been shown to have feed utilization and deposition of nutrients-fluctuations in metabolic rate-little is known about the regulating mechanism that controls hepatic metabolism in yaks under grazing conditions in the cold season. Hence, the objective of this research was to integrate transcriptomic and metabolomic data to better understand how the hepatic responds to chronic nutrient stress. Our analyses indicated that the blood parameters related to energy metabolism (glucose, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, lipoprotein lipase, insulin, and insulin-like growth factor 1) were significantly (p < 0.05) lower in the cold season. The RNA-Seq results showed that malnutrition inhibited lipid synthesis (particularly fatty acid, cholesterol, and steroid synthesis), fatty acid oxidation, and lipid catabolism and promoted gluconeogenesis by inhibiting the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) and PI3K-Akt signaling pathways. For metabolite profiles, 359 metabolites were significantly altered in two groups. Interestingly, the cold season group remarkably decreased glutathione and phosphatidylcholine (18:2 (2E, 4E)/0:0). Moreover, integrative analysis of the transcriptome and metabolome demonstrated that glycolysis or gluconeogenesis, PPAR signaling pathway, fatty acid biosynthesis, steroid biosynthesis, and glutathione metabolism play an important role in the potential relationship between differential expression genes and metabolites. The reduced lipid synthesis, fatty acid oxidation, and fat catabolism facilitated gluconeogenesis by inhibiting the PPAR and PI3K-Akt signaling pathways to maintain the energy homeostasis of the whole body in the yak, thereby coping with the shortage of forages and adapting to the extreme environment of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (QTP).Entities:
Keywords: energy metabolism; forage shortage; liver; metabolomics; transcriptome; yak
Year: 2022 PMID: 35111749 PMCID: PMC8802892 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.759521
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Dev Biol ISSN: 2296-634X
The effects of different seasons on serum biochemical parameters.
| Item | Treatment | SEM |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YC | YW | |||
| TG (mmol/L) | 0.18b | 0.30a | 0.10 | 0.022 |
| LDH (U/L) | 839.14 | 993.62 | 91.92 | 0.433 |
| GLU (mmol/L) | 3.68b | 5.24a | 0.52 | 0.044 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 0.16b | 0.41a | 0.05 | 0.006 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.04b | 1.71a | 0.16 | 0.025 |
| CH (mmol/L) | 1.11b | 2.21a | 0.22 | 0.003 |
| CK (U/L) | 742.50a | 171.32b | 116.74 | 0.015 |
| NEFAs (µmol/L) | 835.90a | 545.64b | 58.24 | 0.012 |
Note: TG, triglycerides; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; GLU, glucose; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; CH, cholesterol; CK, creatine kinase; NEFAs, nonesterified fatty acids.
The effects of different seasons on serum hormone of the yak.
| Item | Treatment | SEM |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YC | YW | |||
| FAS (nmol/L) | 2.93 | 1.94 | 0.33 | 0.145 |
| GH (ng/mL) | 3.66a | 2.36b | 0.42 | 0.018 |
| HSL (ng/mL) | 1.14 | 1.74 | 0.21 | 0.173 |
| IGF-1 (ng/mL) | 48.21b | 55.15a | 2.70 | 0.012 |
| IGF-2 (ng/mL) | 4.45 | 7.11 | 0.97 | 0.185 |
| INS (mIU/L) | 3.36b | 5.10a | 0.68 | 0.002 |
| LPL (U/L) | 96.31b | 148.72a | 13.96 | 0.020 |
Note: FAS, fatty acid synthetase; GH, growth hormone; HSL, Hormone-sensitive fatty lipase; IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor 1; IGF-2, insulin-like growth factor 2; INS, insulin; LPL, lipoprotein lipase.
The effects of different seasons on plasma antioxidant index of the yak.
| Item | Treatment | SEM |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YC | YW | |||
| T-AOC (U/mL) | 9.09 | 5.95 | 1.19 | 0.206 |
| GSH-PX (ng/mL) | 970.15 | 523.30 | 129.47 | 0.082 |
| MDA (nmol/mL) | 2.04 | 1.36 | 0.25 | 0.181 |
| SOD (ng/mL) | 1.83 | 1.07 | 0.23 | 0.104 |
Note: T-AOC, bovine total antioxidant capability; GSH-PX, glutathione peroxidase; MDA, malondialdehyde; SOD, superoxide dismutase.
FIGURE 1Hepatic metabolic profiles in YW/YC group. (A) All samples' principal component analysis (PCA) (at the metabolites level). (B) Orthogonal partial least-squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA). (C) Heat map of differential metabolites in YW/YC group. The abscissa indicates the sample name, and the ordinate indicates the differential metabolite. The color from blue to red indicates the abundance of expression of metabolites from low to high; that is, the redder indicates the higher expression abundance of differential metabolites. (D) Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway terms enriched by metabolites of liver between YW and YC yaks. X axis means rich factor (rich factor = DEGs enriched in the pathway ÷ background genes in the pathway). Y axis represents the KEGG pathway terms. The color of roundness represents p value. The area of roundness represents the number of DEGs enriched in this pathway.
Summary of the sequencing reads alignment to the reference genome.
| Statistics term | YW | YC |
|---|---|---|
| Clean reads | 50.76 | 52.90 |
| Total reads | 50,760,057 | 52,896,499 |
| Total mapped reads | 94.99% | 94.71% |
| Uniquely mapped | 91.0% | 90.54% |
| Nonsplice reads | 49.39% | 50.28% |
| Splice reads | 41.70% | 40.26% |
| Reads mapped in proper pairs | 87.66% | 87.11% |
FIGURE 2Transcriptomic comparisons of liver between YW and YC yaks. (A) All samples principal component analysis (PCA) (at the genes level). (B) Histogram of DEGs in liver of YW and YC yaks. (C) The volcanic map of DEGs in liver of YW and YC groups. Gray was the nonsignificantly different gene; red and green were the significantly different genes. The X axis represents log2 fold change, and the Y axis represents −log10 p value. (D) Heat map for hierarchical cluster analysis of DEGs between samples. Red: up-regulated genes; blue: down-regulated genes. (E) Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of the DEGs in liver of yaks. The top 30 GO terms with the lowest FDR in molecular function and biological process are shown, respectively. Y axis represents GO terms, and X axis represents the −log10 (p value).
FIGURE 3Heat map and KEGG pathways enrichment for DEGs. (A) Heat map of DEG-related hepatic energy metabolism. Red: up-regulated genes; blue: down-regulated genes. (B) KEGG pathways enrichment for DEGs. YC group versus YW group.
FIGURE 4KEGG pathways enrichment and correlation analysis for DEGs and differential metabolite–related energy metabolism. (A) KEGG pathways enrichment for DEGs and differential metabolite–related energy metabolism. YC group versus YW group. (B) Correlation analysis of the differential metabolites and the DEG-related energy metabolism. Y axis represents different genes. X axis represents the different metabolites. Color intensity indicates the following: red: positively correlated; blue: negatively correlated.
FIGURE 5The regulation of the PPAR signaling pathway and PI3K-Akt signaling pathway in the liver of the yak under long-term nutritional stress. ↑: up-regulation of genes expression or enhanced the pathways; ↓: down-regulation of genes expression or diminished the pathways. →: promote or result in. ⊥: the genes expression or metabolic pathways were inhibited.