Literature DB >> 35111632

The accuracy and reliability of 3D printed aortic templates: a comprehensive three-dimensional analysis.

Pawel Rynio1, Maciej Wojtuń2, Łukasz Wójcik2, Miłosz Kawa2, Aleksander Falkowski2, Piotr Gutowski1, Arkadiusz Kazimierczak1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Advances in 3D printing technology allow us to continually find new medical applications. One of them is 3D printing of aortic templates to guide vascular surgeons or interventional radiologists to create fenestrations in the stent-graft surface for the implantation procedure called fenestrated endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. It is believed that the use of 3D printing significantly improves the quality of modified fenestrated stent-grafts. However, the accuracy and reliability of personalized 3D printed models of aortic templates are not well established.
METHODS: Thirteen 3D printed templates of the visceral aorta and sixteen of the aortic arch and their corresponding computer tomography of angiography images were included in this accuracy study. The 3D models were scanned in the same conditions on computed tomography (CT) and evaluated by three physicians experienced in vascular CT assessment. Model and patient CT measurements were performed at key landmarks to maintain quality for stent-graft modification, including side branches and aortic diameters. CT-scanned aortic templates were segmented, aligned with sourced patient data, and evaluated for the Hausdorff matrix. Next, Bland-Altman plots determined the degree of agreement.
RESULTS: The Intraclass Correlation Coefficients values were more than 0.9 for all measurements of aortic diameters and aortic branches diameter in all landmark locations. Therefore, the reliability of the aortic templates was considered excellent. The Bland-Altman plots analysis indicated measurement biases of 0.05 to 0.47 for aortic arch templates and 0.06 to 0.38 for reno-visceral aortic templates. The arithmetic mean of Hausdorff's mean distances of the aortic arch templates was 0.47 mm (SD =0.06) and ranged from 0.34 to 0.58. The mean metrics for abdominal models was 0.24 mm (SD =0.03) and ranged from 0.21 to 0.31.
CONCLUSIONS: The printed models of 3D aortic templates are accurate and reliable, thus can be widely used in endovascular surgery and interventional radiology departments as aortic templates to guide the physician-modified fenestrated stent-graft fabrication. 2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; Accuracy; aneurysm model; aortic template; reliability

Year:  2022        PMID: 35111632      PMCID: PMC8739108          DOI: 10.21037/qims-21-529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  39 in total

1.  Influence of the three-dimensional printing technique and printing layer thickness on model accuracy.

Authors:  Zhe-Chen Zhang; Pei-Lun Li; Feng-Ting Chu; Gang Shen
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.

Authors:  Terry K Koo; Mae Y Li
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-03-31

3.  Three-dimensional (3D) synthetic printing for the manufacture of non-biodegradable models, tools and implants used in surgery: a review of current methods.

Authors:  Benjamin Kirby; Jeffrey M Kenkel; Andrew Y Zhang; Bardia Amirlak; Thomas M Suszynski
Journal:  J Med Eng Technol       Date:  2020-11-20

4.  A 3-Dimensional Printed Aortic Arch Template to Facilitate the Creation of Physician-Modified Stent-Grafts.

Authors:  Pawel Rynio; Arkadiusz Kazimierczak; Tomasz Jedrzejczak; Piotr Gutowski
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 3.487

5.  A simulator for training in endovascular aneurysm repair: The use of three dimensional printers.

Authors:  I O Torres; N De Luccia
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 7.069

Review 6.  Accuracy of 3D Printed Models Created by Two Technologies of Printers with Different Designs of Model Base.

Authors:  Oraphan Rungrojwittayakul; Joseph Y Kan; Kenzo Shiozaki; Rajesh S Swamidass; Brian J Goodacre; Charles J Goodacre; Jaime L Lozada
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 7.  The clinical use of 3D printing in surgery.

Authors:  Luigi Pugliese; Stefania Marconi; Erika Negrello; Valeria Mauri; Andrea Peri; Virginia Gallo; Ferdinando Auricchio; Andrea Pietrabissa
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2018-08-30

Review 8.  3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Philip Tack; Jan Victor; Paul Gemmel; Lieven Annemans
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  Decision-making based on 3D printed models in laparoscopic liver resections with intraoperative ultrasound: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Jan Witowski; Andrzej Budzyński; Anna Grochowska; David H Ballard; Piotr Major; Mateusz Rubinkiewicz; Adriana Złahoda-Huzior; Tadeusz J Popiela; Mateusz Wierdak; Michał Pędziwiatr
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effects of Sterilization Methods on Different 3D Printable Materials for Templates of Physician-Modified Aortic Stent Grafts Used in Vascular Surgery-A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Paweł Rynio; Katarzyna Galant; Łukasz Wójcik; Bartłomiej Grygorcewicz; Arkadiusz Kazimierczak; Aleksander Falkowski; Piotr Gutowski; Barbara Dołęgowska; Miłosz Kawa
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  Initial Experience with Fenestrated Physician-Modified Stent Grafts Using 3D Aortic Templates.

Authors:  Paweł Rynio; Tomasz Jedrzejczak; Anita Rybicka; Ross Milner; Piotr Gutowski; Arkadiusz Kazimierczak
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 4.964

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.