Tetsuharu Kako1, Fumika Azuma1, Kazuya Nokura1, Hideo Izawa2. 1. Department of Neurology, Fujita Health University Bantane Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan. 2. Department of Cardiology, Fujita Health University Bantane Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Patients with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) due to sepsis often develop cerebral infarction; but the frequency, mechanism of onset and prognosis have not been fully elucidated. We reported courses and characteristics of septic DIC cases hospitalized in our hospital in the present study. METHODS: Patients with septic DIC who underwent brain imaging were selected. Vital signs, disorders of consciousness and blood test results at the time of onset were compared between cases that developed cerebral infarction (cerebral infarction group) and those that did not (non-infarction group).In cases of cerebral infarction, the site and the size of the infarct lesion were also described. RESULTS: In 27 septic DIC patients who underwent brain imaging, eight patients had cerebral infarction. Although the percentage of patients who survived in the cerebral infarction group (2/8, 25%) was lower than that in the non-infarction group (7/17, 37%), , no significant difference was observed as both group showed poor prognoses. Those two patients who survived in the cerebral infarction group had severe consciousness disturbance and poor functional prognosis. Although the body temperature was significantly lower and the blood pressure was higher in the cerebral infarction group, no significant difference was found in general blood tests, so we thought it would be necessary to look for other markers that could be indicators for the risk of cerebral infarction.In the cerebral infarction group, two cases had a single lesion, and six cases had multiple lesions. Of the latter, two cases had massive lesions with a diameter of 1.5 cm or greater, four cases had only small lesions with a diameter of less than 1.5 cm, and two cases had a mixture of both. Most of the patients had lesions in the vertebrobasilar artery, which suggested that the pathogenesis involves not only embolism due to microthrombi, but also vasculitis and intravascular inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: Cerebral infarction was observed highly frequently; eight out of 27 cases (29.6%) when brain imaging was undergone in septic DIC patients. The prognosis of patients with cerebral infarction was poor, but no difference from the non-infarction group was observed. In addition to embolism, the presence of inflammation is considered to be important for the onset. In order to predict the prognosis and determine a suitable treatment, it would be recommended to undergo brain imaging when patients with septic DIC have consciousness disturbance or elevated blood pressure, and do not have fever.
OBJECTIVES: Patients with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) due to sepsis often develop cerebral infarction; but the frequency, mechanism of onset and prognosis have not been fully elucidated. We reported courses and characteristics of septic DIC cases hospitalized in our hospital in the present study. METHODS: Patients with septic DIC who underwent brain imaging were selected. Vital signs, disorders of consciousness and blood test results at the time of onset were compared between cases that developed cerebral infarction (cerebral infarction group) and those that did not (non-infarction group).In cases of cerebral infarction, the site and the size of the infarct lesion were also described. RESULTS: In 27 septic DIC patients who underwent brain imaging, eight patients had cerebral infarction. Although the percentage of patients who survived in the cerebral infarction group (2/8, 25%) was lower than that in the non-infarction group (7/17, 37%), , no significant difference was observed as both group showed poor prognoses. Those two patients who survived in the cerebral infarction group had severe consciousness disturbance and poor functional prognosis. Although the body temperature was significantly lower and the blood pressure was higher in the cerebral infarction group, no significant difference was found in general blood tests, so we thought it would be necessary to look for other markers that could be indicators for the risk of cerebral infarction.In the cerebral infarction group, two cases had a single lesion, and six cases had multiple lesions. Of the latter, two cases had massive lesions with a diameter of 1.5 cm or greater, four cases had only small lesions with a diameter of less than 1.5 cm, and two cases had a mixture of both. Most of the patients had lesions in the vertebrobasilar artery, which suggested that the pathogenesis involves not only embolism due to microthrombi, but also vasculitis and intravascular inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: Cerebral infarction was observed highly frequently; eight out of 27 cases (29.6%) when brain imaging was undergone in septic DIC patients. The prognosis of patients with cerebral infarction was poor, but no difference from the non-infarction group was observed. In addition to embolism, the presence of inflammation is considered to be important for the onset. In order to predict the prognosis and determine a suitable treatment, it would be recommended to undergo brain imaging when patients with septic DIC have consciousness disturbance or elevated blood pressure, and do not have fever.
Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a condition in which microthrombi
are formed in a blood vessel due to infection or a cancer. In recent years, the relationship
with microcirculatory disturbance has been emphasized, and the condition is now defined as
enhancement of intravascular coagulation that can cause organ damage.[1] It is thought that damage to vascular endothelial cells and the
progression of microcirculatory disturbance lead to multiple organ failure. Microthrombi are
mainly found in the kidney and lungs, and they may cause renal failure and acute lung injury
(ALI).[2]In 1865, Trousseau reported that systemic embolism (particularly cerebral embolism)
due to a cancer as phlebitis and venous thrombosis,[3] and subsequently, the concept was established as multiple thrombosis due mainly
to DIC caused by adenocarcinoma and endocarditis. Recently, a few studies on cerebral infarction
associated with infectious diseases have been conducted,[4] and it has been reported that about 25% of patients with infective
endocarditis have neurological complications.[5]On the other hand, some patients who consult the neurology department with chief
complaints of paralysis and consciousness disturbance may develop cerebral infarction due to
septic DIC, but there have been very few studies of frequency and prognosis.In this study, we investigated the background and prognosis of patients with
cerebral infarction complicated by infectious DIC, and examined whether there was a difference
from patients who did not have cerebral infarction.
Methods
Our hospital is a general hospital with 453 beds. From patients admitted to our
hospital during the three years from 2011 to 2013, patients with a diagnosis of DIC were
selected. Those in whom the underlying disease was confirmed to be an infectious disease were
selected, while patients with cancers and those in whom an underlying infectious disease could
not be identified were excluded. Further, using the acute DIC score[6] developed by the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine and the
Japanese Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis, those with a score of 4 or higher were diagnosed
as DIC. Cases with a DIC score of 3 or less were excluded. Patients who underwent CT or MRI when
DIC was diagnosed were the final target. For these patients, using the SOFA score[7] which is the diagnostic criteria for sepsis; if there
was an increase of 2 or more, these patients were confirmed to have sepsis.Among the selected septic DIC patients, vital signs (blood pressure, body
temperature, pulse rate, respiratory rate) at the onset, presence/absence of consciousness
disturbance, and blood test results (blood count, biochemistry, coagulation test) were
retrospectively investigated. Diagnosis of cerebral infarction was made by the appearance of a
low density area on CT, or the appearance of a high signal on a MR diffusion-weighted image.
Using these data, we examined whether there was a difference between the group with cerebral
infarction and the non-cerebral infarction group.
Statistical analysis
EzR[8] and Excel were used as
statistical packages. In order to examine the sex difference in the occurrence of cerebral
infarction, the absence/presence of sepsis and the survival rate, the patients were first
divided into two groups according to whether or not they had cerebral infarction. Then, the
number of cases was recorded respectively according to the sex, presence/absence of sepsis and
survival/death, and the data was tested using the χ² test. For comparison of age, blood test
data and vital signs, the Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to examine the numerical values of
each item in the two groups, i.e., eight cases with cerebral infarction and 19 cases without
cerebral infarction. For all the items, p<0.05 was considered as statistically
significant.
Ethical considerations
This study was conducted with the approval of the Fujita Medical University Ethics
Committee (CI18-273). Great care was taken to protect patient privacy. Since this was a
retrospective study, the number of patients was large: Hence, informed consent was not possible
to be obtained, and opt-out was performed.
Results
Selection of study cases
The number of patients admitted to our hospital between 2011 and 2013 was 25017, of
which 118 (0.47%) were registered with DIC as the name of the disease. Of these, 21 cases were
DIC patients with malignant tumor as the underlying disease, and there were 97 DIC cases
excluding non-infectious diseases. Next, 32 patients with an acute DIC score of 3 or less were
excluded, and the remaining 65 patients were diagnosed with DIC. Of these, 51 cases had
consciousness disturbance at the time of DIC diagnosis, and in 27 cases, head CT or MRI was
performed after DIC developed and consciousness disturbance appeared (Figure 1). All of these 27 cases met the diagnostic criteria for sepsis using
the SOFA score. Of the 27 patients who underwent brain imaging, the onset of cerebral
infarction was confirmed in eight cases (29.6%).
Figure 1
The exclusion diagnosis algorithm.
Examination of 27 cases for which brain imaging diagnoses were performed
A comparative study was undertaken by dividing the 27 cases undergoing brain
imaging into two groups; eight cases with cerebral infarction, and 19 cases without cerebral
infarction.Table 1 shows the background such as age and
underlying disease. The average age of the cerebral infarction group was 84.87±9.16
years, and the average age of the non-infarction group was 76.10±16.18 years; and there
was no significant difference (p=0.10). There were 14 males and 13 females, and cerebral
infarction was observed in four of each; thus there was no gender difference as to the
occurrence of cerebral infarction (respectively, p=0.90). Out of 27 cases, nine (33.3%)
survived. Regarding survival rates, the prognosis was poor in both the cerebral infarction and
the non-infarction groups, but no significant difference was observed (p=0.21). Severe
disturbance of consciousness remained in the two survivors of the cerebral infarction group,
and the functional prognosis was also poor.
Table1
Age, gender, and underlying diseases of 27 patients with septic disseminated intravascular
coagulation according the occurrence of cerebral infarction.
Cerebral infarction (+)
Cerebral infarction (−)
Gender(Male/Female)
4/4
12/7
Age
84.87±9.16
76.1±16.18
Number of survivors
2
7
Underlying diseases
Pneumonia
5
13
Urinary-tract infection
2
0
Others
1
6
Next, vital signs and blood test results were compared between the cerebral
infarction group and the non-infarction group (Table 2).
In terms of vital signs, both systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were
significantly higher in the cerebral infarction group (p<0.001) (Figure 2). The pulse rate tended to be lower in the cerebral infarction group,
but there was no significant difference (p=0.11). In the cerebral infarction group, no increase
in body temperature was observed, and all cases were 37.5°C or lower, whereas in the
non-infarction group higher values were frequently observed, and a significant difference was
found (p=0.011) (Figure 3).
Table2
Mean value of body tempereture, blood pressure, pulse rate, and levels of inflammatory and
coagulation markers in septic disseminated intravascular coagulation patients with or without
cerebral infarction.
Cerebral infarction (+) n=8
Cerebral infarction (−) n=19
p value
Body tempereture
°C
36.55±0.48
37.57±1.13
0.011
Systolic blood pressure
mmHg
146.13±13.33
113.25±19.19
<0.001
Diastolic blood pressure
mmHg
74.88±9.25
60±13.03
<0.001
Pulse rate
/min
92.62±20.62
106.47±22.40
0.11
White blood cells
/μL
14950±8519.90
14584.90±9919
0.92
Pletelets
×104/μL
10.36±6.97
10.57±8.36
0.96
Fibrin degradation product
μg/mL
123.05±84.34
122.50±206.67
0.99
PT-INR
1.21±0.91
1.91±1.52
0.08
C-reactive protein
mg/dL
16.70±5.97
12.53±7.12
0.16
PT-INR=Prothrombin Time International Normalized Ratio; p value is based on
Wilcoxin rank sum test.
Figure 2
Comparison of the blood pressures of the cerebral infarction group and the non-infarction
group. Both the systolic and diastolic blood pressures were significantly increased in the
cerebral infarction group.
Comparison of the body temperature of the cerebral infarction group and the non-infarction
group. The cerebral infarction group had lower body temperature.
Blood test results showed that FDP were higher than 25 μg/mL, which is three
points in the acute DIC score, in all eight cases of the cerebral infarction group, but no
significant difference was observed compared with the non-infarction group (p=0.99). Regarding
the platelet count, the mean value was 93000/μL in the cerebral infarction group and 79000/μL
in the non-infarction group, but there was also no significant difference (p=0.96). The mean
CRP value for the inflammatory response was 16.70 mg/dL in the infarct group and
12.53 mg/d in the non-infarct group, which tended to be higher in the infarct group, but
there was no significant difference (p=0.16). PT-INR was slightly longer in the non-infarction
group than in the cerebral infarction group, but again no significant difference was observed
(p=0.08).
Image findings of cerebral infarction cases
The characteristics of the lesions in the eight patients with cerebral infarction
were examined (Table 3). There were two cases with a
single lesion, and six cases with multiple lesions. Of these, two cases had massive lesions
with a diameter of 1.5 cm or more (Figure 4), four
cases had only small lesions with a diameter of less than 1.5 cm (Figure 5), and two cases had a mixture of both (Figure 6). Six of the eight cases had a marked consciousness disturbance with a GCS of
six or less at diagnosis. In the eight cerebral infarction cases, infarction was also observed
in the vertebrobasilar artery system in six cases, and there was also one case where cerebral
infarction was not found in the internal carotid artery system (middle cerebral artery region,
etc.). In the six cases with multiple lesions, head MRA showed no occlusion of the main
artery.
Table3
Age, gender, type of infection, type of infarction, assessment score, admitted department of
8 cases with cerebral infarction.
No.
Age
Gender
Type of infection
massive/multiple
Area of infarction
DIC score
GCS
Admission
1
72
Male
Pneumonia
massive+multiple
PCA, PICA, WS
4
15
Neurology
2
105
Female
Pneumonia
multiple
PCA, MCA
6
5
Respiratory medicine
3
83
Female
Enteritis
massive
MCA
7
5
Gastroenterology
4
86
Male
Urinary tract infection
multiple
PCA
6
4
Neurology
5
85
Female
Urinary tract infection
multiple
AICA, MCA, WS
4
3
Neurology
6
77
Female
Pneumonia
massive+multiple
PCA, WS
4
3
Respiratory medicine
7
82
Female
Pneumonia
multiple
PICA, PCA, MCA
8
14
Neurology
8
89
Male
Pneumonia
massive
MCA
4
3
Neurology
MCA=Middle cerebral artery, ACA=Anterior cerebral artery, PCA=Posterior cerebral
artery, PICA=Posterior inferior cerebellar artery, WS=Watershed of MCA/ACA or PCA,
GCS=Glasgow coma scale, DIC=Disseminated intravascular coagulation
Figure 4
Case 8: 89-year-old male. Cerebral infarction was a single lesion, and it was massive (over
15 mm).
a Brain MR DWI showed cerebral infarction in the anterior half of the right middle
cerebral artery region.
b MRA indicated the possibility that a branch of the middle cerebral artery was
occluded.
c Chest CT showed pneumonia.
Figure 5
Case 4: 86 year old male. A case with multiple small infarctions. He had marked
consciousness disturbance, and required emergency hospital admission.
a MRI showed acute cerebral infarction of less than 15 mm in the middle part
of the right pons and the left occipital region.
b MRA showed no obvious abnormalities.
Figure 6
Case 1: 72-year-old male. He required emergency transport because of difficulty walking.
This was a mixed case of a massive lesion+small lesions.
a Brain MRI showed a lesion of greater than 15 mm+multiple small
infarctions.
b MRA did not show disruption of the main artery.
c Chest X-ray showed an image of pneumonia.
Discussion
The essential pathogenesis of DIC is a combination of thrombosis and inflammatory
response, which can be divided into two types, a fibrinolysis-promoting type and
fibrinolysis-inhibiting type. In DIC due to inflammation, the latter type is more common, and
necessarily causes ischemic lesions. Upon invasion by pathogens, dendritic cells and macrophages
inside epithelial cells recognize them as pathogen molecules (collectively referred to as PAMPs
(Pathogen-Associated Molecular Patterns), such as endotoxins), resulting in the generation of
cytokines and HMGB1 (high mobility group box-1 protein). HMGB1 and cytokines induce tissue
repair, but if PAMPs are excessive and spread throughout the body, they cause DIC. Hatada
et al. have demonstrated that the simultaneous presence in blood vessels of HMGB1 and
thrombin, which are substances related to this inflammation, causes DIC.[9] Moreover, in sepsis, the production of thrombomodulin
and t-PA is reduced by inflammatory cytokines, and fibrinolysis is inhibited,[10] which leads to thrombus formation. There is also a
study stating that in addition to these reactions, in brain tissue, thromboplastin is high and
the amount of thrombomodulin is low, making it prone to embolism.[11] At the same time, although thrombomodulin is found in the brain, it
is less distributed in the pons and putamen, which are common sites of cerebral infarction, and
there is a view that thrombomodulin works to suppress the formation of infarction also in the
brain.[12] Septic DIC is considered to be the
fibrinolysis-inhibited form of DIC, in which cases with high plasminogen activator inhibitor-1
(PAI-1) levels are associated with poor prognosis and are more likely to result in organ damage
caused by circulatory disturbances.[13]The laboratory tests measured during the course of DIC in this study varied from
case to case. As described above, markers associated with organ symptoms in
fibrinolysis-inhibited DIC include PAI-1, antithrombin III (AT-III), protein C, HMGB-1,
leukocyte elastase fractionated fibrin degradation products (e-XDP) and soluble fibrin (SF), but
they were measured in only a few cases. In this study, we found no significant differences in
common parameters such as platelet count, FDP, and C-reactive protein (CRP), which are
indicators of DIC status, between the infarct group and non-infarct group. Hence, it is
necessary to look for other markers that predict the onset of cerebral infarction. In future, it
will also be necessary to collect a large number of cases with a wider range of test items, and
to undertake a prospective study.In six out of eight cases of cerebral infarction complicated by septic DIC, cerebral
infarction was also observed in the vertebrobasilar artery system, and conversely, there was
also a case with no cerebral infarction in the internal carotid artery system. In collagen
disease (systemic lupus erythematosus), it has been reported that vasculitis is involved in the
onset of cerebral infarction, and vertebrobasilar artery lesions were found in many
cases.[14] Based on these findings, it is
considered that the pathogenesis of cerebral infarction of infectious DIC is due not only to
microthrombi floating in the blood vessels, but also vasculitis and inflammatory reactions in
the blood vessels. There are also cases of infarction in the internal carotid system that are
indistinguishable from ordinary atherothrombotic cerebral infarction (Figure 4), and atherosclerosis may indeed be a risk factor for cerebral
infarction triggered by DIC.The causative disease of DIC was pneumonia in five of the eight patients (Table 3). Microemboli via the general circulation are usually
entrapment in the lungs and do not reach the brain. Emboli to the brain often originate from the
pulmonary circulation, and if there is inflammation in the lungs, emboli generated in the
pulmonary circulation are more likely to cause embolism in the brain. However, our study could
not prove the hypothesis that pneumonia is likely to cause cerebral infarction.In the eight cases with cerebral infarction, the systolic and diastolic blood
pressures were significantly higher, and bradycardia tended to occur. When the intracranial
pressure increases due to the onset of cerebral infarction or cerebral hemorrhage, the blood
pressure is increased by sympathetic nerve stimulation, resulting in bradycardia. This is known
as Cushing’s reflex.[15] Patients with severe
infections and sepsis tend to have lower blood pressure due to shock, and the SOFA score and
qSOFA score used to predict sepsis[7] also
include decreased systolic blood pressure and the mean arterial pressure as diagnostic criteria.
However, blood pressure is significantly increased in the cerebral infarction group, and
Cushing’s reflex is considered to occur in septic DIC patients. In septic DIC patients, if their
blood pressure is normal or high, it is necessary to consider that they may also be experiencing
cerebral infarction.The mechanism whereby body temperature did not rise in the cerebral infarction group
is not clear, but it has been reported that body temperature does not rise even under stress due
to damage of orexin-positive cells in the hypothalamus.[16] Damage of orexin-positive cells in the hypothalamus due to inflammation and
microemboli in the blood vessels of the vertebrobasilar arterial system may be involved.In this study, 51 out of 65 DIC patients had consciousness disturbance, of which 27
(52.9%) underwent brain imaging, which was a low rate. Cerebral infarction was confirmed at a
high rate in eight cases (29.6%) among the 27 cases where brain imaging was actually performed
by the attending physician, so if the other patients also had had a brain imaging examination,
it is possible that the onset of cerebral infarction might have been detected. It has long been
considered that DIC causes encephalopathy due to various factors, resulting in consciousness
disturbance.[17] In this paper, DIC
encephalopathy includes cerebral infarction, white matter lesions, and PRES (posterior
reversible encephalopathy syndrome) observed on head MR. DIC may be treated by a department not
specializing in neurological disorders, such as an emergency doctor; and in DIC patients with a
consciousness disturbance, head CT or MRI should always be conducted to decide whether or not to
administer a neuroprotective drug or prevent cerebral edema. In addition, more than half of the
patients with cerebral infarction who suffered from septic DIC were admitted to the neurology
department (Table 3). However, since treatment of the
underlying disease is the most important factor in the DIC state, and the neurologist must
collaborate with a specialist in the infected organ.In the treatment of DIC, it is recommended to administer AT-III preparations as
anticoagulant therapy when antithrombin activity is decreased.[18] In many cases of DIC associated with infectious disease, AT-III
activity decreases, so administration of AT preparations is often necessary. Because the concept
of DIC is not widely known abroad, their effectiveness has not been proven.[19] But in Japan, in a clinical study on DIC cases from
around 2009, it was reported that the recovery rate from DIC was significantly high.[20] Also in Japan, although thrombomodulin preparations
can be used for the treatment of DIC, they were not adopted in the Japanese Clinical Practice
Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2016. However, studies are still ongoing,
and they are reported to be effective in some patients.[21] It has also been reported that cytokine adsorption by blood purification
therapy is effective for the treatment of sepsis,[22] and if these treatment interventions allow early recovery from septic DIC,
they may lead to inhibition of the onset of cerebral infarction, which is a future goal.PDF-Japanese
Authors: Christopher W Seymour; Vincent X Liu; Theodore J Iwashyna; Frank M Brunkhorst; Thomas D Rea; André Scherag; Gordon Rubenfeld; Jeremy M Kahn; Manu Shankar-Hari; Mervyn Singer; Clifford S Deutschman; Gabriel J Escobar; Derek C Angus Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-02-23 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: J Kienast; M Juers; C J Wiedermann; J N Hoffmann; H Ostermann; R Strauss; H-O Keinecke; B L Warren; S M Opal Journal: J Thromb Haemost Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 5.824