| Literature DB >> 35111441 |
Johannes Rosskopf1,2, Bernd Schmitz1,2, Meinrad Beer2, Andrej Pala3, Soung Yung Kim1,2.
Abstract
A small, benign enhancing lesion posterior to the intracranial vertebral artery at the foramen magnum is a recently described image-based entity and believed to represent varix or ganglion. We report on an individual who underwent surgery due to a hybrid neurofibroma/schwannoma of the trigeminal nerve and additionally presented a small gadolinium-enhancing lesion in the right spinal canal at the level of the craniocervical junction (CCJ). The intraoperative finding of this enhancing lesion most likely represents the lateral internal vertebral venous plexus which does not require follow up or surgical excision.Entities:
Keywords: benign enhancing lesion; foramen magnum lesion; high signal lesion; intraoperative photographs; vascular structure
Year: 2021 PMID: 35111441 PMCID: PMC8791429 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.20753
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184
Figure 1Case report of a benign enhancing foramen magnum lesion with intraoperative photographs
On axial T1 volumetric non-enhanced (A) and postcontrast imaging (B) benign enhancing foramen magnum lesion (arrow) adjacent to the vertebral artery (arrowhead). The Hounsfield unit of this structure was 41 on non-enhanced brain CT (C). Images of surgical microscope (D and E). By use of a navigation pointer (D, asterisk) the benign enhancing foramen magnum lesion was identified as a nodular structure (D, arrow). The venous appearing structure was observed and the dura mater was opened. Neither a benign mass like a ganglion or a malign mass like a metastasis was found. Venous bleeding instead occurred (E).
Reviewed article involving benign enhancing foramen magnum lesion
BEFML: benign enhancing foramen magnum lesion
| authors | Article type | main message | follow up | intra-operative proof | highlights |
| McGuinness et al. [ | clinical report of 14 patients | first description of a newly recognized entity | in 9 patients | none | two patients underwent cerebral angiography and no arterial or venous structure were identified to explain the enhancing lesion on MR imaging |
| Antonucci and Spampinato [ | letter to the editor | confirmed the presence of BEFML | 18 months | none | BEFML might be associated with small bridging veins approximating nerve roots |
| Kogue et al. [ | retrospective original article on 3717 patients | prevalence of high-signal lesions 3.4% | yes but not specified | none | possible association between high-signal lesion and spinal accessory nerve |
| Kogue et al. [ | retrospective original article on 76 patients | 3D balanced fast-field echo imaging distinguished between spinal accessory nerve and high-signal lesion | no | none | - |
| Nayate [ | two case reports | enhancing lesion likely represents bridging veins | 63 months and 1 year | none | - |
| Rosskopf et al. [present case] | case report | benign enhancing foramen magnum lesion is a venous structure documented on intraoperative photographs | no | yes | venous bleeding occurred during surgical investigation of the lesion |