Literature DB >> 35111429

Lacosamide-Related Arrhythmias: A Systematic Analysis and Review of the Literature.

Ruchi Yadav1, Ezra Schrem2, Vivek Yadav3, Amog Jayarangaiah4, Sushruth Das5, Pramod Theetha Kariyanna6.   

Abstract

Lacosamide (LCM) is a new antiepileptic drug used as an adjunctive treatment for partial seizures with and without secondary generalization. One of the modes of action is the enhancement of slow inactivation of voltage-gated sodium channels. Experimental studies and clinical trials suggest that LCM acts upon both neurons and the heart and may increase the risk of cardiac arrhythmias. A systematic review was conducted to investigate characteristics of arrhythmias related to the use of LCM for the treatment of seizures. The search terms "lacosamide", "arrhythmias", "AV block", "atrial fibrillations/flutter", "cardiac conductions defects", "ventricular tachycardia", "ventricular fibrillation were used. Case reports and retrospective studies were gathered by searching Medline/PubMed, Google Scholar, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Cochrane CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and Web of Science databases. Seventeen articles were selected for review. Ventricular tachycardia was the most reported LCM related arrhythmia (29.4%), followed by new-onset atrial fibrillation (17.6%), complete heart block (17.6%), Mobitz type 1 Atrio-ventricular block (11.8%), sinus pauses (11.8%), pulseless electrical activity (5.9%) and widening QRS complex (5.9%). Further research and clinical trials are needed to explore the etiopathogenesis and causative relationship between the use of LCM and arrhythmias.
Copyright © 2021, Yadav et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  : lacosamide; arrhythmias; atrial fibrillation; av block; echocardiography; electrocardiography; heart block; sinus pauses; ventricular tachycardia

Year:  2021        PMID: 35111429      PMCID: PMC8790938          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.20736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


Introduction and background

Lacosamide (LCM) is a new antiepileptic drug approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in October 2008 as an adjunctive treatment for partial seizures with and without secondary generalization [1]. It is composed of (R)-2-acetamido-N-benzyl-3-methoxyproionamide, causing slow inactivation of voltage-gated sodium channels in neurons [2]. Based on the above mechanism of action several reports of dose-dependent cardiac arrhythmias have been reported in the literature [3-6]. LCM inhibits cardiac sodium channel SCN5A that could be an underlying possible mechanism for cardiac arrhythmias, including ventricular tachycardia, sinus pauses, atrial fibrillation, and sudden death [7, 8]. Limited data is available on the relationship between the use of antiepileptic drugs/LCM and cardiac arrhythmias. Multiple isolated cases of arrhythmias have been associated with LCM use [5, 6, 9]. Here we present a systematic review of such cases of LCM-related arrhythmias to evaluate the need for assessment of risk factors and potentially warn physicians of the dose-related cardiac effects of LCM.

Review

Method A comprehensive literature search was conducted by two authors, using Medline/Pubmed, Google Scholar, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Cochrane CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and Web of Science databases, for relevant studies since 2008. The terms “lacosamide, arrhythmias, AV block, atrial fibrillations/flutter, cardiac conductions defects, ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, cardiac conductions defects” were used to identify cases of myocardial arrhythmias associated with LCM use. A total of 108 articles were found related to LCM and arrhythmias. Only articles that reported LCM use and the presence of cardiac arrhythmias were included. Seventeen studies that included the case reports were then deemed eligible for inclusion in this review as shown in Table 1. Studies were excluded if: 1) Articles were not case reports, case series or observational studies, or 2) Articles were reviews or editorials. The reference list of each report was reviewed for potential additional cases. All cases were reviewed in detail. The present analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A PRISMA flow diagram detailing the process of identification, selection, and inclusion of studies is shown in Figure 1.
Table 1

Summary of study characteristics of all the searched articles.

ACLS-advanced cardiac life support; Afib-atrial fibrillation;  Aflutter-atrial flutter;  AR-aortic regurgitation;  AV-atrioventricular;  AVB-atrioventricular block;  AVR-aortic valve repair;  bpm-beats per minute;  CAD-coronary artery disease;  CCU-coronary care unit;  CHF-congestive heart failure;  CVA-cerebrovascular accident;  CV-cardiovascular;  dced-discontinued;  EF-ejection fraction;  EKG-electrocardiography;  f.b.-followed by;  F-female;  G1DD-grade1 diastolic dysfunction;  HLD-hyperlipidemia;  HOCM-hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy;  HR-heart rate;  HTN-hypertension;  ICH-intracranial hemorrhage;  IVF-intravenous fluids;  JER-junctional escape rhythm;  LCM-lacosamide;  LFB-left fascicular block;  LVH-left ventricular hypertrophy;  MAT-multifocal atrial tachycardia;  M-male;  MR-mitral regurgitation;  MVR-mitral valve replacement;  NA-not available;  NCT-narrow complex tachycardia;  NE-norepinephrine;  NSR-normal sinus rhythm;  PEA-pulseless electrical activity;  PHT-pulmonary hypertension;  PVC-premature ventricular complexes;  RAD-right axis deviation;  RBBB-right bundle branch block;  RHD-rheumatic heart disease;  RVR-rapid ventricular rate;  SB-sinus bradycardia;  ST-sinus tachycardia;  TCP-transcutaneous pacing;  TIA-transient ischemic attack;  TR-tricuspid regurgitation;  TTE-transthoracic echocardiography;  VF-ventricular fibrillation;  VT-ventricular tachycardia;  WCT-wide complex tachycardia;  WMA-wall motion abnormalities;  WNL-within normal limits

 

Year of publication, author[references]Age/sexCV risk factorsIndication for LCMEKGTTEArrhythmiaFinal diagnosis of arrhythmiaMx of arrhythmiaCardiac arrestDeath
 2010, Digeorgia [1]37/FNoneSeizuresAflutter, HR~100-136 bpm, turning into afibNANew-onset aflutter/afibAfib LCM dcedNoNo
 2011, Nizam [5]45/MNoneSeizuresMobitz 1 & RBBBWNLMobitz type 1 & bradycardiaMobitz type ILCM dcedNoNo
 2011, Krause [6]89/FHTN, HypokalemiaSeizuresComplete AV nodal block 15 mins after LCM bolus, 30 mins later 1O AVB, NSR laterNAComplete heart block and pauses x3 up to 10 secsAVB type IIILCM dced and IVF resuscitationYesYes  
 2011, Wittstock [1081/FHTN, CAD, 1O AVB, left cerebellar CVA, hypokalemiaSeizuresInitially 1o AVB, after LCM complete AVN block, later on, aflutterNAComplete heart block with asystole for 30 secAVB type IIIAtropine, LCM dced & metoprololNoNo
 2012, Kaufman [1167/FHypokalemiaSeizuresInitial NSR~ 96 bpm with PVCs, after LCM Afib with RVR~ 132 bpmNo WMA, EF~55%, Mild AR, TR, mod PHTNew-onset Afib with RVR~132 bpmAfibMetoprolol 2.5 mg IV x1, f.b. spontaneous resolution after 8h, LCM dcedNoNo
 2013, Digeorgia [7]49/MHTN, HLD, low HR variabilitySeizures1O AVB with LFB & severe QRS widening, NSR after LCM was dcedNASustained VT on outpatient stress testVTLCM dcedNoNo
2013, Chinnasami [12]49/FNoneSeizuresBaseline before LCM- SB~54 bpm After LCM- interval sinus pauses with JERNAJER & pauses (33 times, longest~ 6.24 sec), also ST~118 bpm & SB~36 bpmSinus pauseHolter monitor and LCM dcedNoNo
2015, Loomba [13]3/MCongenital hypoplastic left heart syndrome, well-controlled MATSeizuresBaseline-NSR, wide complex tachycardia~ 240-260 bpm after use of LCM, NSR-post-dischargeNAWCT~240-260 bpm, in addition to NCT with 1:1 and 2:1 ventricular response & gradual complex widening during non- sustained runsVTAmiodarone infusion, flecainide toxicity treatment (bicarb, intralipids, isoproterenol)- not available hence eventual cardioversionNoNo
2015, Chua-Tuan [14]16/FNoneOverdose toxicityAdmission-ST@139 bpm, then ST~108BPM terminal RADWNLCardiac arrest, secondary to pulseless VT with bradycardia & asystoleVTACLS protocol with shocks, epinephrine, atropine, bicarbonate, on NE dripYesNo
 2017, Berei [15]70/FHTN, RHD s/p  AVR and MVR, Type 2 ischemic painSeizuresBaseline EKG~NSR  After LCM Sinus node dysfunction with LBBB and widened QRS~160 msec AR due to malfunctioning AV bioprosthesis.EF 65%Wide complex monomorphic VT 2 hours after second dose of LCMVTAmiodarone infusion, cardioversion LCM dcedNoNo
 2018, Lachuer [16]88/FHTN, anginaSeizuresNSR and LBBB at baseline. After LCM - SB which progressed to extreme bradycardia 30 bpm and complete AVBLVH, MR, TRComplete heart block with extreme bradycardia to 30 bpm preceded by SBAVB Type IIIICU admission, atropine f.b. IV isoprenaline. LCM and bisoprolol dced.NoNo
 2019, Ng [17]48/FNoneOverdose toxicityWidened QRS~118ms (baseline 88 ms)NAWidening of QRS complexWide QRS complexesSodium bicarb without relief, with supportive careNoNo
 2020, Hsu [18]73/MCAD, CHF, HTN, Afib, HLD, ICHSeizuresNo formal EKGNABradycardia with unstable hemodynamic that progressed to PEAPEAAtropine f.b.1 round CPR with epinephrine f.b. TCP and isoproterenolYesNo
 2020,Majmundar [19]95/MTIA, HTNSeizuresBaseline- 1O  AVB (PR 270 ms). After LCM- 1O AVB (PR 378 ms) LBBB, wide QRS~200msReturned to baseline after LCM dcedNALengthening PR interval, new-onset LBBB, widened QRS and episodes of SB to 30 bpm and sinus pauses~ 3 sec notedSinus pauseSwitching LCM to topiramate, external pacing, and 24 hours observation in CCUNoNo
 2020, Stamm [20]32/MBaseline-SB with early repolarization. Occasional intermittent palpitations at baselineSeizures1o AVB, J point elevation, and early repolarization, EKG returning to baseline, sinus brady with PR WNL. Mobitz I after IV LCMNA1O AVB with progression to Mobitz I after switching from PO to IV LCMMobitz type ILCM dcedNoNo
 2020, Eleftheriou [2138/FHOCM, HTN, prolonged QTcSeizuresVFNAAn episode of VT f.b. 27 episodes of life-threatening VF after a 3rd IV dose of 400 mg LCMVTCardioversion @200J, NSR after LCM discontinuationYesNo
 2020, Corbellini [22]88/MObesity, HTN, HLD, mild MR and AR, G1DDSeizuresNSR, 66 bpm with 1o AVB at baseline, after IV LCM -afib with RVR to 140 bpmG1DD mild MR, mild ARNew-onset Afib with RVR @140 bpmAfibAmiodarone infusion, LCM dcedNoNo
Figure 1

Flow diagram of literature search and selection criteria adapted from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)

LCM-lacosamide

 

Summary of study characteristics of all the searched articles.

ACLS-advanced cardiac life support; Afib-atrial fibrillation;  Aflutter-atrial flutter;  AR-aortic regurgitation;  AV-atrioventricular;  AVB-atrioventricular block;  AVR-aortic valve repair;  bpm-beats per minute;  CAD-coronary artery disease;  CCU-coronary care unit;  CHF-congestive heart failure;  CVA-cerebrovascular accident;  CV-cardiovascular;  dced-discontinued;  EF-ejection fraction;  EKG-electrocardiography;  f.b.-followed by;  F-female;  G1DD-grade1 diastolic dysfunction;  HLD-hyperlipidemia;  HOCM-hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy;  HR-heart rate;  HTN-hypertension;  ICH-intracranial hemorrhage;  IVF-intravenous fluids;  JER-junctional escape rhythm;  LCM-lacosamide;  LFB-left fascicular block;  LVH-left ventricular hypertrophy;  MAT-multifocal atrial tachycardia;  M-male;  MR-mitral regurgitation;  MVR-mitral valve replacement;  NA-not available;  NCT-narrow complex tachycardia;  NE-norepinephrine;  NSR-normal sinus rhythm;  PEA-pulseless electrical activity;  PHT-pulmonary hypertension;  PVC-premature ventricular complexes;  RAD-right axis deviation;  RBBB-right bundle branch block;  RHD-rheumatic heart disease;  RVR-rapid ventricular rate;  SB-sinus bradycardia;  ST-sinus tachycardia;  TCP-transcutaneous pacing;  TIA-transient ischemic attack;  TR-tricuspid regurgitation;  TTE-transthoracic echocardiography;  VF-ventricular fibrillation;  VT-ventricular tachycardia;  WCT-wide complex tachycardia;  WMA-wall motion abnormalities;  WNL-within normal limits

Flow diagram of literature search and selection criteria adapted from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)

LCM-lacosamide Data was collected by four authors that included demographic data, cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, indication for LCM use, electrocardiography (EKG) findings, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) findings, type of arrhythmias, cardiac arrest, and management when available as shown in Table 1. Result Table 2 summarizes the result of our systematic review of LCM-related arrhythmias. A total of 17 cases were identified with a median age of 48+/- 27.2, of whom 59% were females and 41% were males. Seizure/epilepsy was the indication for LCM use in all cases (100%) however 5.88% of the cases that were reported had LCM toxicity due to suicidal overdose. The prevalence of cardiovascular/arrhythmogenic risk factors was hypertension (HTN) in 52.9%, hyperlipidemia (HLD) in 17.6%, hypokalemia in 17.6%, and coronary artery disease (CAD) in 11.8%. Obesity, atrial fibrillation, transient ischemic attack (TIA), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, prolonged QTc, history of mitral and aortic valve replacement, and multifocal atrial tachycardia were reported in 5.9% in each. Beta-blocker usage was reported in 23.5% and use of flecainide in 5.9%. Ventricular tachycardia was the most reported LCM related arrhythmia (29.4%), followed by new-onset atrial fibrillation (17.6%), complete heart block (17.6%), Mobitz type 1 atrioventricular block (11.8%), sinus pauses (11.8%), pulseless electrical activity (5.9%) and widening QRS complex (5.9%). Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was done in six patients, all of whom had normal ejection fractions. Temporary pacemaker placement was reported in 17.6% and permanent pacemaker placement in 5.9%. Cardiac arrest was reported in 35.29% and death was reported in 5.9% of the cases.
Table 2

Summary of the result of the systematic review of LCM related arrhythmias.

Abbreviations: HTN-hypertension; HLD-hyperlipidemia; CAD-coronary artery disease; DM-diabetes mellitus; Afib-atrial fibrillation; TIA-transient ischemic attack; TTE-transthoracic echocardiography; EF-ejection fraction

Cases identified (n) 17
Age; n ± SD Median 48 ± 27.2
Sex; n (%)  
 Males7/17 (41%)
 Females10/17 (59%)
Indication of LCM; n    
 Overdose toxicity2
 Seizures/epilepsy  15
Cardiovascular risk factors; n (%)  
 HTN9/17, (2.9%)
 HLD3/17, (17.6%)  
 Hypokalemia3/17, (17.6%)  
 CAD2/17, (11.8%)  
 DM1/17, (5.9%)
 Obesity1/17, (5.9%)  
 Afib1/17, (5.9%)  
 TIA1/17, (5.9%)
 History of aortic and mitral valve replacement1/17, (5.9%)
 Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy1/17, (5.9%)
 Prolonged QTc1/17, (5.9%)
 Multifocal atrial tachycardia1/17, (5.9%)
Patients on relevant medications; n, (%)  
 Beta-Blockers4/17, (23.5%)
 Flecainide1/17, (5.9%)
Reported arrhythmia; n, (%)  
 Ventricular tachycardia5/17, (29.4%)
 New onset AFib3/17, (17.6%)
 Complete heart block3/17, (17.6%)  
 Mobitz type I2/17, (11.8%)
 Sinus pause2/17, (11.8%)
 Pulseless electrical activity1/17, (5.9%)  
 Widening of QRS complex1/17, (5.9%)  
TTE reported; n, (%)  
 TTE mentioned in 6 articles- all had normal EF6/6, (100%)
 No TTE data available12/17, (70.5%)
Pacemaker; n, (%)  
 Temporary pacing3/17, (17.6%)
 Permanent pacemaker1/17, (5.9%)
Cardiac arrest; n, (%) 6/17, (35.29%)
Death; n, (%) 1/17, (5.9%)

Summary of the result of the systematic review of LCM related arrhythmias.

Abbreviations: HTN-hypertension; HLD-hyperlipidemia; CAD-coronary artery disease; DM-diabetes mellitus; Afib-atrial fibrillation; TIA-transient ischemic attack; TTE-transthoracic echocardiography; EF-ejection fraction Discussion LCM is a novel antiepileptic agent used for add-on therapy in patients with partial and secondarily generalized seizures [2]. Intravenous LCM has been used for the treatment of status epilepticus [2]. Its main mechanism of action is the enhancement of the slow inactivation of voltage-gated sodium channels thus reducing the ability of neurons to sustain prolonged firing bursts [3]. Experimental studies and clinical trials suggest that LCM acts upon both neurons and the heart and may increase the risk of cardiac arrythmias [4]. The action potentials of most of the cardiac tissues, including the His-Purkinje system, are generated through voltage-gated sodium channels however that of AV node is through voltage-gated calcium channels [4, 7]. As seen with other anticonvulsant agents, dose-dependent inhibition of sodium channels produces infra-Hisian delays and conduction defects that could be one of the postulated mechanisms of cardiac arrhythmias with the use of LCM [2, 4]. It follows linear pharmacokinetics with a maximum concentration reached within 1-4 hours and a half-life of 13 hours [2]. Clinical trials [4, 23] have shown the association of LCM, dose-ranging from 200-600 mg/day, with cardiac conduction defects including atrial fibrillation and flutter. Few case reports suggesting first-degree AV block and third-degree AV blocks with LCM use have been retrieved from the literature [10] [24]. Traditional sodium channel blocking agents such as carbamazepine and phenytoin cause the fast inactivation of voltage-dependent sodium channels and may have potential synergistic action with LCM [12]. However, clinical trials [25] did not show any additional adverse effects with concomitant use of other sodium channel blockers. Several studies, including our systematic review, have documented cardiac arrhythmias with the use of LCM hence recommendations before the initiation may include baseline EKG, evaluation of cardiac risk factors, electrolytes levels, and adjusting the dose of LCM based on renal and hepatic functions.

Conclusions

Arrhythmias associated with the use of LCM in seizures have been documented in several case reports and studies. LCM inhibits the cardiac sodium channel by enhancing slow inactivation in a concentration-dependent manner. The timing of several cardiac arrhythmias after initiation of LCM and their resolution after discontinuation suggests a possible pro-arrhythmic role of LCM as described in Table 1. Identification of any pre-existing cardiac/arrhythmogenic risk factors may prove to be beneficial before commencing treatment with LCM. One must also consider reviewing the home medications and their dosage to prevent any drug-drug interactions with the use of LCM. In our systematic review study, ventricular tachycardia was the most reported of LCM-related arrhythmia, and wide QRS complex was the least common one. Discontinuation of LCM was one of the common factors that helped to restore the sinus rhythm in most of the studied case reports. Comparative studies may be warranted for defining the role of a higher dosage of LCM~600 mg/day as compared to ~400mg/day in causing arrhythmias. Further research and clinical trials are needed to explore the etiopathogenesis and causative relationship between the use of LCM and arrhythmias. In addition, further investigations are needed to study the cardiac effects of LCM and its interactions with other antiepileptic drugs involving the inhibition of cardiac sodium channels. Electrocardiographic (ECG) testing before and during LCM therapy along with close monitoring may help to avoid cardiac arrhythmias
  23 in total

1.  A pooled analysis of lacosamide clinical trial data grouped by mechanism of action of concomitant antiepileptic drugs.

Authors:  John-Kenneth Sake; David Hebert; Jouko Isojärvi; Pamela Doty; Marc De Backer; Kendra Davies; Andrea Eggert-Formella; James Zackheim
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.749

2.  On the relationship between block of the cardiac Na⁺ channel and drug-induced prolongation of the QRS complex.

Authors:  A R Harmer; J-P Valentin; C E Pollard
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Complete Atrioventricular Block in an Elderly Patient Treated with Low-Dose Lacosamide.

Authors:  Célia Lachuer; Jennifer Corny; Yvonnick Bézie; Sadri Ferchichi; Bernard Durand-Gasselin
Journal:  Cardiovasc Toxicol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.231

4.  Atrial flutter/atrial fibrillation associated with lacosamide for partial seizures.

Authors:  Christopher M Degiorgio
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2010-05-31       Impact factor: 2.937

5.  Lacosamide-induced atrial tachycardia in a child with hypoplastic left-heart syndrome: the importance of assessing additional proarrhythmic risks.

Authors:  Rohit S Loomba; Anoop K Singh; Joshua Kovach; Todd M Gudausky
Journal:  Cardiol Young       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 1.093

6.  Lacosamide-induced recurrent ventricular fibrillation: A case report.

Authors:  Georgios Eleftheriou; Raffaella Butera; Mariapina Gallo; Andrea Giampreti; Lorella Faraoni; Maria Gioia Contessa; Giuseppe Bacis
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.366

7.  Efficacy and safety of oral lacosamide as adjunctive therapy in adults with partial-onset seizures.

Authors:  Elinor Ben-Menachem; Victor Biton; Dalius Jatuzis; Bassel Abou-Khalil; Pamela Doty; G David Rudd
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.864

8.  Cardiac sodium channel blockade after an intentional ingestion of lacosamide, cyclobenzaprine, and levetiracetam: Case report.

Authors:  Jenny L Chua-Tuan; Dazhe Cao; Janetta L Iwanicki; Christopher O Hoyte
Journal:  Clin Toxicol (Phila)       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 4.467

9.  Low-dose lacosamide-induced atrial fibrillation: Case analysis with literature review.

Authors:  Kenneth R Kaufman; Arnaldo E Velez; Stephen Wong; Ram Mani
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav Case Rep       Date:  2012-11-08
View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluation of Cardiovascular Concerns of Intravenous Lacosamide Therapy in Epilepsy Patients.

Authors:  Yan-Ting Lu; Chih-Hsiang Lin; Chen-Jui Ho; Che-Wei Hsu; Meng-Han Tsai
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.086

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.