| Literature DB >> 35111268 |
Yongjie Zhou1,2,3, Liangwen Wang1,2,3, Wen Zhang1,2,3, Jingqin Ma1,2,3, Zihan Zhang1,2,3, Minjie Yang1,2,3, Jiaze Yu1,2,3, Jianjun Luo1,2,3,4, Zhiping Yan1,2,3,4.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) play the important role in tumor occurrence and progression, and the epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) is the critical process for tumor migration. However, the role of EMT-related lncRNA in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has not been elucidated.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35111268 PMCID: PMC8802097 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6335155
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dis Markers ISSN: 0278-0240 Impact factor: 3.464
Figure 1Identification of differentially expressed EMT-related lncRNAs. The heatmap (a) and the volcano plot (b) showed the differentially expressed EMT-related lncRNAs between HCC tumor tissues and adjacent normal tissues.
The clinicopathological characteristics of patients with HCC.
| Characteristics | No. (%) |
|---|---|
| Gender | |
| Male | 255 (67.6) |
| Female | 122 (32.3) |
| Age | |
| ≤65 | 236 (62.5) |
| >65 | 141 (37.5) |
| Grade | |
| G1-G2 | 236 (62.6) |
| G3-G4 | 137 (36.3) |
| Unknown | 4 (1.1) |
| Stage | |
| Stage I-II | 262 (69.5) |
| Stage III-IV | 92 (24.4) |
| Unknown | 23 (6.1) |
| T stage | |
| T1-T2 | 279 (74.0) |
| T3-T4 | 92 (24.4) |
| Unknown | 6 (1.6) |
| N stage | |
| N0 | 255 (67.6) |
| N1 | 118 (31.3) |
| Unknown | 4 (1.1) |
| M stage | |
| M0 | 272 (72.1) |
| M1 | 101 (26.8) |
| Unknown | 4 (1.1) |
EMT-related lncRNAs associated with overall survival (OS).
| ID | Coef | HR | HR.95L | HR.95H |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| lnc-CCNY-1 | 0.457342603 | 1.57987006 | 1.250877801 | 1.995390281 | 0.00012358 |
| AC022424.1 | 0.046529762 | 1.047629258 | 1.009914891 | 1.086752034 | 0.012868687 |
| AC079305.2 | 0.034220542 | 1.034812801 | 1.012748546 | 1.05735776 | 0.001858415 |
| AC068506.1 | 0.210820365 | 1.234690542 | 1.104272923 | 1.380510834 | 0.000214405 |
| AC026369.2 | 0.418336152 | 1.519431348 | 1.230999207 | 1.875445255 | 9.82E-05 |
| ELFN1-AS1 | 0.045657717 | 1.046716077 | 1.004076559 | 1.091166341 | 0.03142199 |
| AC009005.1 | 0.140782576 | 1.151174328 | 1.024057994 | 1.294069615 | 0.018364991 |
| AC068580.1 | 0.238162915 | 1.268915901 | 1.066708751 | 1.509453787 | 0.007164066 |
| AL049840.6 | 0.079975567 | 1.0832606 | 1.011253892 | 1.160394572 | 0.022676322 |
EMT-related lncRNAs associated with relapse-free survival (RFS).
| ID | Coef | HR | HR.95L | HR.95H |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZFPM2-AS1 | 0.090455547 | 1.094672845 | 1.040883457 | 1.151241889 | 0.000433751 |
| lnc-CCNY-1 | 0.289126912 | 1.335261178 | 1.04681349 | 1.703190139 | 0.019890581 |
| AC005332.3 | 0.102852689 | 1.108328128 | 1.055492193 | 1.163808931 | 3.67E-05 |
Figure 2Validation of two prognostic models. Kaplan-Meier survival curve and ROC curve for OS and RFS in the training set (a, b) and the validation set (c, d).
Figure 3mRNA-lncRNA networks associated with OS signature (a) and RFS signature (b).
Figure 4The association of prognosis and immune landscape with EMT-related lncRNAs. Patients with HCC were grouped into two clusters according to the consensus clustering matrix (k = 2) (a). Kaplan-Meier survival curve for OS (b) and RFS (c) between two clusters. The heatmap of clinicopathological characters, immune microenvironment, and EMT-related lncRNA expression between two clusters (d). Comparison of stromal score, ESTIMATE score, and immune score between the two clusters (e–g). Difference of infiltrating immune cell between two clusters (h).
Figure 5Kaplan-Meier survival curve for OS and RFS, according to the expression of Lnc-CCNY-1.
Figure 6The relationship of Lnc-CCNY-1 and pathways.
Figure 7Correlation between immune cells and the expression of Lnc-CCNY-1 (∗ indicated p < 0.05, ∗∗ indicated p < 0.01).