Literature DB >> 35110907

Feasibility, Safety, Nodal yields and Learning curves in Retroauricular Robot/Endoscope Assisted Neck Dissection in the Management of Head and Neck Cancer.

Mohamed Abdul Kathar1, Prateek Jain1, Kapila Manikantan1, Pattatheyil Arun1, Yoon Woo Koh2, Rajeev Sharan1.   

Abstract

Head and neck cancer is one of the most common in India. There is an increasing incidence of oral cancer in young patients. Where the primary lesion is amenable to transoral resection for early cancer, young patients are concerned about cosmesis and would prefer a surgical approach that would avoid a visible scar in the neck. Robot/endoscope-assisted neck dissection by retroauricular approach was performed in a total of 28 patients of cN0 patients between June 2016 and December 2019. The duration of surgery, perioperative complications, number of lymph nodes retrieved, and cosmetic outcomes were analyzed. Robot- and endoscope-assisted neck dissections were done in 15 and 13 cases, respectively. The mean age of the cohort was 46.18 ± 9.68 years. Twenty-four patients had tongue cancer. Mean time for skin flap raising, docking, and robotic console use was 48.21 ± 7.48 min, 10 ± 3.16 min, and 176.67 ± 47.27 min, respectively. Mean neck dissection time from skin incision to skin closure was 231.79 ± 54.94 min for completing level I to IV neck dissection. The mean number of retrieved nodes was 33.69 ± 12.81. Majority of the patients were highly satisfied with their cosmetic outcomes. During a median follow-up of 19.5 months, 3 patients developed recurrence. Robot/ endoscope-assisted neck dissection was feasible and safe but took a longer time to perform. Nodal yields were adequate and better cosmetic outcomes were achieved. © Indian Association of Surgical Oncology 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscopic neck dissection; Head and neck cancer; Remote access neck surgery; Retroauricular neck dissection; Robotic neck dissection

Year:  2021        PMID: 35110907      PMCID: PMC8763986          DOI: 10.1007/s13193-021-01444-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0975-7651


  20 in total

1.  Association of Compliance With Process-Related Quality Metrics and Improved Survival in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Evan M Graboyes; Jennifer Gross; Dorina Kallogjeri; Jay F Piccirillo; Maha Al-Gilani; Michael E Stadler; Brian Nussenbaum
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 6.223

2.  Robotic selective neck dissection by a postauricular facelift approach: comparison with conventional neck dissection.

Authors:  Kyung Tae; Yong Bae Ji; Chang Myeon Song; Jin Hyeok Jeong; Seok Hyun Cho; Seung Hwan Lee
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  Robotic versus conventional neck dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniel C Sukato; Daniel P Ballard; Jason M Abramowitz; Richard M Rosenfeld; Stefan Mlot
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 4.  Robotic thyroidectomy and neck dissection: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Jandee Lee; Woong Youn Chung
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.360

5.  Functional and cosmetic outcomes of robot-assisted neck dissection by a postauricular facelift approach for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Yong Bae Ji; Chang Myeon Song; Hyang Sook Bang; Hae Jin Park; Ji Young Lee; Kyung Tae
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.337

6.  Initial experience with robot-assisted modified radical neck dissection for the management of thyroid carcinoma with lateral neck node metastasis.

Authors:  Sang-Wook Kang; So Hee Lee; Haeng Rang Ryu; Kang Young Lee; Jong Ju Jeong; Kee-Hyun Nam; Woong Youn Chung; Cheong Soo Park
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  The perception of scar cosmesis following thyroid and parathyroid surgery: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Asit Arora; Chloe Swords; George Garas; Konstantinos Chaidas; Alexa Prichard; James Budge; D Ceri Davies; Neil Tolley
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 6.071

8.  Therapeutic robot-assisted neck dissection via a retroauricular or modified facelift approach in head and neck cancer: a comparative study with conventional transcervical neck dissection.

Authors:  Won Shik Kim; Hyung Kwon Byeon; Young Min Park; Jong Gyun Ha; Eun Sung Kim; Yoon Woo Koh; Eun Chang Choi
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.147

9.  Prognostic value of the nodal yield in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review.

Authors:  Willem W B de Kort; Sybren L N Maas; Robert J J Van Es; Stefan M Willems
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 3.147

10.  Increasing incidence and improving survival of oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Yi-Jun Kim; Jin Ho Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.