Literature DB >> 35110057

Clostridium difficile Colonization Before and After Hospitalization in Children.

Türkay Rzayev1, Pelin Yüksel Mayda2, Tülay Erkan3, Bekir Kocazeybek4, Tufan Kutlu3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Beginning in the early 2000s, Clostridium difficile infection has become a major health problem in the United States, Canada, and in most European countries and has not only increased in incidence but also the severity. There are 2 conditions for the development of C. difficile infection: disruption of the normal gastrointestinal flora, and exogenous ingestion of the microorganism. We aimed to study C. difficile colonization in hospitalized children. We identified 2 issues: (1) the relationship between risks before hospital admission and colonization on the first day of hospitalization and (2) the effect of the factors that patients are exposed to during hospitalization on the colonization status at discharge.
METHODS: Patients aged between 2 and 18 years who were hospitalized with various diagnoses were included in this study. C. difficile toxin A/B was investigated in the stool samples taken on the admission and discharge days.
RESULTS: One hundred six patients were included in the study, of whom 24.5% and 48.1% of hemato-oncology patients were positive for C. difficile toxin A/B. Antibiotic usage within 1 month preceding hospitalization and the presence of underlying disease impact the C. difficile colonization status on the first day of hospitalization.
CONCLUSION: Toxigenic C. difficile colonization prevalence is high in hospitalized children, especially in the hemato-oncology patient group.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 35110057      PMCID: PMC8848804          DOI: 10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2021.21139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk Arch Pediatr        ISSN: 2757-6256


The most important risk factor for Clostridium difficile infection is antibiotic exposure and hospitalization. Recent studies have shown growing numbers of community-acquired infection cases as well. This study is the first study investigating the prevalence of toxigenic C. difficile colonization in hospitalized children in our country. C. difficile positivity is high in children on the first day of hospitalization in the third-level hospitals.

Introduction

Clostridium difficile is a Gram-positive, anaerobic, toxin-producing, spore-forming enteric bacillus. It was first isolated in 1935 from the stool of healthy neonates.[1] C. difficile infection is a toxin-mediated intestinal disease, the symptoms of which can range from mild diarrhea to severe abdominal pain and fever. The clinical outcomes can alternate from asymptomatic colonization to the formation of pseudomembranes in the colon or toxic megacolon, bowel perforation, sepsis, shock, and death.[2] C. difficile has become a major health problem in the United States, Canada, and in most European countries in recent years. The epidemiology of C. difficile infection changed dramatically in the early 2000s. The disease not only increased in incidence but also severity.[3] Its incidence increased from 24 per 10 000 discharges to 58 per 10 000 discharges (P < .001) among hospitalized children in the United States during 2003-2012.[4] There has also been an increase in the rate of C. difficile infection in some chronic diseases (cystic fibrosis, inflammatory bowel disease, solid organ transplant, human immunodeficiency virus infection, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, neoplastic disease, and pancreatitis).[4] The most important risk factor for C. difficile infection is antibiotic exposure.[5] The other well-known risk factors are gastric acid suppression, co-morbid conditions such as neuromuscular, cardiovascular, respiratory, renal, gastrointestinal, hematologic, immunologic, metabolic, and malignant diseases, and congenital disorders.[4,6,7] Hospitalization is another risk factor for C. difficile infection.[8] However, recent studies have shown growing numbers of community-acquired C. difficile infection cases as well.[9-11] In this study, we investigated the prevalence of toxigenic C. ­difficile. We aimed to determine the prevalence of C. difficile colonization in children on the first day of hospitalization and investigate the relationship between age, gender, presence of underlying diseases, and antibiotic therapy before hospitalization. We also investigated the effect of antibiotic treatment and length of stay in patients who were C. difficile -negative at admission.

Methods

Population and Sample

Patients aged between 2 and 18 years who were hospitalized with various diagnoses in Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty Department of Pediatrics between June 2015 and February 2016 were included in this study. Ethics committee approval was obtained for the study from Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa (Faculty Deanship Clinical Research Ethics Committee, Date: June 5, 2015; Number: 29430533-903.99-141904). Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient’s parents. Stool samples were taken from the patients on the first day of hospitalization and C. difficile toxin A/B was investigated. C. difficile toxin A/B was investigated by taking a second stool sample before discharge from patients who were found to be C. difficile toxin A/B-negative at admission and had received antibiotic treatment during hospitalization (Figure 1).
Figure 1.

Flowchart of the patients.

Data Collection

The patient's parents were interviewed face-to-face on the first day of hospitalization. Information was obtained on whether the patients had underlying diseases and had used antibiotics during the month preceding hospitalization. Informed consent of the parents was obtained. Hospital electronic medical records, patient files, and nurse records were also investigated.

Diagnostic Procedures

Collected stools were studied following the testing procedure using RIDASCREEN C. difficile Toxin A/B (C0801) kits. The cut-off was calculated as negative control + 0.15. Values greater than 10% were considered positive.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.0 (IBM SPSS Corp.; Armonk, NY, USA) program was used for statistical analysis. Number (n) and percentage (%) values were used in the expression of descriptive data. When examining between-group differences for categorical variables with an expected value less than 5 in less than 20% of cells, a Pearson chi-square test was used. In the comparison of continuous variables, non-normally distributed data were expressed as the median, mean, and standard deviation values and the Mann–Whitney U-test was used. A value of P < .05 was determined as the statistical significance level.

Results

Demographic Variables

One hundred six patients were included in the study. The average age of the patients was calculated as 7.3 years. The female/male ratio of the patients was 64/42.

Evaluation of the Results on the First Day of Hospitalization

There was no statistically significant difference between positive and negative patients in terms of age (P = .791; Mann–Whitney U-test). There was no significant difference between male and female patients at admission in terms of toxin positivity (P = .433; Pearson chi-square test) (Table 1). Stool samples were taken from each patient during hospitalization and C. difficile toxin A/B was found positive in 26 (24.5%) patients. Of the 106 patients included in our study, 54 had an underlying chronic disease. C. difficile toxin positivity was found to be significantly higher in patients with underlying disease (P = .009; Pearson chi-square test) (Table 1). The diagnoses of chronic patients and the number of C. difficile toxin A/B positive patients at hospitalization are presented in Table 2. Since the number of subjects was not sufficient, statistical comparison between groups was not possible. The prevalence of C. ­difficile positivity was significantly higher in patients who had used antibiotics one month before hospitalization compared to the group without prior antibiotic use (P = .01; Pearson chi-square test) (Table 1). There was no difference in C. difficile positivity between patients who received a single antibiotic and those who received 2 or more antibiotics (P = .679; Pearson chi-square test) (Table 1). Antibiotic types and C. difficile positivity in patients receiving single antibiotic therapy are presented in Table 3. It was not possible to draw statistical conclusions from the distribution. The patients included in the study were hospitalized in 10 different services: hemato-oncology, infectious diseases, gastroenterology, nephrology, cardiology, neurology, rheumatology, endocrinology, metabolic diseases, and genetic diseases (Table 4). Most of the patients and positive results were distributed in the infectious diseases and hemato-oncology services. When these 2 services were compared, the prevalence of C. difficile at hospitalization in hemato-oncology patients was found to be statistically significantly higher (P = .01; Pearson chi-square test) (Table 1).
Table 1.

Comparison of Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of the Groups

Clostridium difficile Toxin A/B Positive Patients, n = 26 Clostridium difficile Toxin A/B Negative Patients, n = 80 P
Gender, n (%)
 Male14 (21.9)50 (78.1)0.433χ2**
 Female12 (28.9)30 (71.1)
Presence of underlying disease, n (%)
 Yes19 (35.2)35 (64.8)0.009χ2
 No7 (13.5)45 (86.5)
Antibiotic usage within one month before hospitalization, n (%)
 Yes23 (31.9)49 (68.1)0.01χ2
 No3 (8.8)31 (91.2)
Number of antibiotics, n (%)
 Single antibiotic use11 (29.7)26 (70.3)0.679χ2
 Multiple antibiotic use12 (34.3)23 (65.7)
Department, n (%)
 Hemato-Oncology13 (48.1)14 (51.9)0.01χ2
 Infectious diseases6 (13.6)38 (86.4)

**Pearson chi-square test.

Table 2.

Diagnoses of Patients with Underlying Disease and Positive Clostridium difficile Toxin A/B Results

DiagnosisNumber of Patients, (N = 54)Number of Clostridium difficile Positive Patients, (N = 19)
1Acute lymphoblastic leukemia115
2Osteosarcoma42
3Neuroblastoma32
4Acute myeloblastic leukemia22
5Lymphoma20
6Ewing sarcoma11
7Wilms tumor11
8Retinoblastoma10
9Medulloblastoma10
10Rhabdomyosarcoma10
11Systemic lupus erythematosus21
12Wegener’s granulomatosis10
13Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis10
14Autoimmune encephalitis11
15Cystic fibrosis51
16Bronchiectasis10
17Neutrophil dysfunction10
18Chronic granulomatous disease20
19Chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis10
20Agammaglobulinemia20
21Liver transplantation10
22Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease10
23Ulcerative colitis10
24Neurointestinal dysplasia10
25Intestinal tuberculosis10
26Food allergy11
27Ornithine transcarbamoylase deficiency11
28Chronic renal failure10
29Nephrotic syndrome10
30Meningomyelocele11
Table 3.

Antibiotic Type and Positive Clostridium difficile Toxin A/B Results in Patients Receiving Single Antibiotic Therapy

AntibioticNumber of Patients, (N = 37)Number of Positive Results, (N = 11)
1Cefuroxime135
2Amoxicillin clavulanic acid91
3Meronem21
4Gentamicin11
5Ceftriaxone11
6Azithromycin11
7Cefazole11
8Ciprofloxacin20
9Amikacin10
10Amoxicillin10
11Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole10
12Metronidazole10
13Fluconazole10
14Ampicillin sulbactam10
15Penicillin10
Table 4.

Number of Patients and Positive Clostridium difficile Toxin A/B Results by Service

1Infection2713
2Hemato-Oncology446
3Neurology92
4Cardiology81
5Gastroenterology51
6Metabolic diseases11
7Rheumatology41
8Nephrology31
9Endocrinology40
10Genetic diseases10

Evaluation of the Results on Discharge

From 49 patients who were found to be C. difficile Toxin A/B-negative on admission and were using antibiotics during their hospitalization, second samples were taken again at discharge, and positivity was detected in 3 patients (6.1%) after antibiotics. The mean hospital stay was 21.69±18.51 days and there was no statistically significant difference between positive and negative patients in terms of hospital stay (P = .860; Mann–Whitney U-test) (Table 5).
Table 5.

Length of Stay in Hospital and Clostridium difficile Toxin Positivity

C. difficile ToxinLength of Stay in Hospital (Days) P **
Mean ± SDMedian
Positive16.33 ± 1.1517.00.860
Negative22.04 ± 19.0617.00
Total21.69 ± 18.5117.00

**Mann–Whitney U-test.

Discussion

There are 2 conditions for the development of C. difficile infection: disruption of the normal gastrointestinal flora, reducing the colonization resistance in favor of C. difficile; and exogenous ingestion of the microorganism.[12] The major virulence factors of C. difficile are toxin A and toxin B; the toxin-negative strains are nonpathogenic. Toxins cause impairment in the intestinal epithelium and are encoded by the genes tcdA and tcdB located at the pathogenicity locus. The toxin A and/or B enzyme immunoassay (EIA) test for stool is widely used in the diagnosis of C. difficile infection. Testing for both toxins was recommended by the Committee on Infectious Disease of the American Academy of Pediatrics. This is due to the physiological fluctuations of C. difficile toxin production during disease which means that the toxin B assay alone failed to identify as much as 34.9% of infection cases.[13] In our study, the presence of C. difficile toxin A/B was investigated by taking stool samples during hospitalization regardless of the clinical findings, diagnoses, and complaints of the patients, and the prevalence of C. difficile colonization in hospitalized children was found to be 24.5%. Zacharioudakis et al.[14] conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 19 studies in which the prevalence of C. difficile in hospitalizations was investigated and 8725 patients were included, and they found that the prevalence of toxigenic C. difficile colonization was 8.1% and showed a tendency to increase over time. Furuichi et al.[15] investigated C. difficile colonization in hospitalized children in Japan in 2012-2013. Two hundred fifty-one patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence of underlying disease and the frequency of C. difficile and the toxin-producing C. difficile were 21.6% and 9.0% respectively in children without underlying diseases. In patients with underlying disease, these rates were found to be 30.8% and 23.1%, respectively, higher than in the first group. Colonization with C. difficile does not require treatment as it is not believed to be a direct precursor for C. difficile infection. On the other hand, a C. difficile infection is a clear indication that therapy is required.[16] The importance of C. difficile colonization is not a well-understood subject. The colonization rate of C. difficile in newborns and infants younger than 2 years ranges from 2.5% to 90%.[17] Zacharioudakis et al.[14] showed that patients colonized with C. difficile during hospitalization have a 5.9-fold higher risk of C. difficile infection compared to non-colonized patients. Recent studies show that asymptomatic carriers may be involved in transmission.[18] In a recent meta-analysis of C. ­difficile colonization at hospital admission, the risk of developing C. difficile infection during hospital stay was 18.4%.[14] Patients with asymptomatic colonization, whose colonization status is uncertain, may cause horizontal transmission inside the health care unit.[19] C. difficile is transmitted by the fecal-oral route of ingestion of microorganisms. Its spores can be taken from patients with colonization as a result of contact, and are often transported through the hands of hospital staff. Patients staying in the same room with C. difficile -positive patients in the hospital get infected with C. difficile in a shorter time than people who are in a single room or whose roommate is negative for C. difficile (3.2 days vs 18.9 days).[20] Recent antibiotic exposure is believed to be the most important risk factor for the development of C. difficile infection in both adults and children.[13] Our study also supports this relationship. The prevalence of C. difficile positivity was significantly higher in patients who had antibiotic use before hospitalization compared to the group without prior antibiotic use (P = .01). In this study, we found a 48.1% C. difficile positivity in pediatric hematology-oncology patients. The study, conducted in a 566-bed academic medical care center, showed that the prevalence of colonization with toxigenic C. difficile among adult patients with hematological malignancies and/or bone marrow transplant at admission was 9.3%, with 13.3% of the colonized patients developing the symptoms during hospitalization.[21] Immunocompromised (IMC) patients seem to be at serious risk of recurrent C. difficile infections. A recent study looking at the results of 149 IMC patients (62 hematological conditions, 36 solid organ transplants, 13 receiving high-dose prednisone, 38 undergoing chemotherapy) showed that the rate of recurrent C. difficile infection was significantly higher (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.6-5).[22] In the adult hematology-oncology population, C. difficile infection rates range from 6% to 33%, with most cases happening early post-transplantation (within 30 days). This incidence rate is higher than the C. difficile infection rate of the general population, which is 1%.[23] In a retrospective study in Turkey, 986 children with diarrhea were investigated for C. difficile infection and 100 children were diagnosed with C. difficile infection among 12 196 hospitalized children during 2012-2014.[24] The presence of underlying chronic diseases, presence of solid organ tumors, and hospitalization in the hematology and oncology ward were found to be independent risk factors for C. difficile infection. This study is the first study in Turkey investigating the prevalence of toxigenic C. difficile in hospitalized children. Malignancy, chemotherapy, and long-term use of broad-spectrum antibiotics predispose hemato-oncology patients to C. difficile. These conditions can cause C. difficile transmission or lead to progression from asymptomatic colonization to severe disease.[25,26] For this reason, it is important to determine the index cases by searching for C. difficile-positive patients and to separate them from patients with risk factors and suppressed immunity in terms of controlling the disease.

Diagnostic Limitations

In our study, we investigated the prevalence of C. difficile colonization and the risk factors affecting it. We did not investigate the effect of this colonization on the clinical condition of the patients, their complaints, and symptoms. The small number of patients is the most significant limitation of this study. We believe that further studies should be conducted in the pediatric age group, and the importance of colonization, especially in the hemato-oncology patient group, should be investigated further.

Conclusion

Toxigenic C. difficile colonization on the first day of hospitalization is high in children. The presence of underlying disease and the history of antibiotic usage within one month preceding hospitalization were associated with this. In hemato-oncology patients, colonization rates reach 48.1%. The effects of such high toxigenic C. difficile colonization rates in IMC patients need to be investigated in further studies with a larger sample size.
  25 in total

Review 1.  Clostridium difficile--more difficult than ever.

Authors:  Ciarán P Kelly; J Thomas LaMont
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Effectiveness of screening hospital admissions to detect asymptomatic carriers of Clostridium difficile: a modeling evaluation.

Authors:  Cristina Lanzas; Erik R Dubberke
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.254

3.  Nosocomial acquisition of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  L V McFarland; M E Mulligan; R Y Kwok; W E Stamm
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-01-26       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Colonization with toxinogenic C. difficile upon hospital admission, and risk of infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ioannis M Zacharioudakis; Fainareti N Zervou; Elina Eleftheria Pliakos; Panayiotis D Ziakas; Eleftherios Mylonakis
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Risk Factors for Acquisition and Loss of Clostridium difficile Colonization in Hospitalized Patients.

Authors:  Erik R Dubberke; Kimberly A Reske; Sondra Seiler; Tiffany Hink; Jennie H Kwon; Carey-Ann D Burnham
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Risk of Clostridium difficile Infection in Hematology-Oncology Patients Colonized With Toxigenic C. difficile.

Authors:  Cara M Cannon; Jackson S Musuuza; Anna K Barker; Megan Duster; Mark B Juckett; Aurora E Pop-Vicas; Nasia Safdar
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 3.254

7.  Clostridium difficile in Immunocompromised Hosts: A Review of Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Treatment, and Prevention.

Authors:  Sara Lynn Revolinski; L Silvia Munoz-Price
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Bacterial interference between Clostridium difficile and normal fecal flora.

Authors:  R D Rolfe; S Helebian; S M Finegold
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 5.226

9.  Hospital acquired Clostridium difficile infection in pediatric wards: a retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Ayse Karaaslan; Ahmet Soysal; Nurhayat Yakut; Gulsen Akkoç; Sevliya Ocal Demir; Serkan Atıcı; Nurver Ulger Toprak; Guner Söyletir; Mustafa Bakır
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-08-11

Review 10.  Clostridium difficile - From Colonization to Infection.

Authors:  Holger Schäffler; Anne Breitrück
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.