Literature DB >> 35108741

Can Prehospital Data Improve Early Identification of Sepsis in Emergency Department? An Integrative Review of Machine Learning Approaches.

Manushi D Desai1, Mohammad S Tootooni2, Kathleen L Bobay2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is associated with high mortality, especially during the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Along with high monetary health care costs for sepsis treatment, there is a lasting impact on lives of sepsis survivors and their caregivers. Early identification is necessary to reduce the negative impact of sepsis and to improve patient outcomes. Prehospital data are among the earliest information collected by health care systems. Using these untapped sources of data in machine learning (ML)-based approaches can identify patients with sepsis earlier in emergency department (ED).
OBJECTIVES: This integrative literature review aims to discuss the importance of utilizing prehospital data elements in ED, summarize their current use in developing ML-based prediction models, and specifically identify those data elements that can potentially contribute to early identification of sepsis in ED when used in ML-based approaches.
METHOD: Literature search strategy includes following two separate searches: (1) use of prehospital data in ML models in ED; and (2) ML models that are developed specifically to predict/detect sepsis in ED. In total, 24 articles are used in this review.
RESULTS: A summary of prehospital data used to identify time-sensitive conditions earlier in ED is provided. Literature related to use of ML models for early identification of sepsis in ED is limited and no studies were found related to ML models using prehospital data in prediction/early identification of sepsis in ED. Among those using ED data, ML models outperform traditional statistical models. In addition, the use of the free-text elements and natural language processing (NLP) methods could result in better prediction of sepsis in ED.
CONCLUSION: This study reviews the use of prehospital data in early decision-making in ED and suggests that researchers utilize such data elements for prediction/early identification of sepsis in ML-based approaches. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35108741      PMCID: PMC8810268          DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1742369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Clin Inform        ISSN: 1869-0327            Impact factor:   2.342


  38 in total

1.  Reduced mortality after the implementation of a protocol for the early detection of severe sepsis.

Authors:  Glauco A Westphal; Álvaro Koenig; Milton Caldeira Filho; Janaína Feijó; Louise Trindade de Oliveira; Fernanda Nunes; Kênia Fujiwara; Sheila Fonseca Martins; Anderson R Roman Gonçalves
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 3.425

Review 2.  Developing a New Definition and Assessing New Clinical Criteria for Septic Shock: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

Authors:  Manu Shankar-Hari; Gary S Phillips; Mitchell L Levy; Christopher W Seymour; Vincent X Liu; Clifford S Deutschman; Derek C Angus; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Mervyn Singer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  The Timing of Early Antibiotics and Hospital Mortality in Sepsis.

Authors:  Vincent X Liu; Vikram Fielding-Singh; John D Greene; Jennifer M Baker; Theodore J Iwashyna; Jay Bhattacharya; Gabriel J Escobar
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  Machine Learning versus Usual Care for Diagnostic and Prognostic Prediction in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hashim Kareemi; Christian Vaillancourt; Hans Rosenberg; Karine Fournier; Krishan Yadav
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 5.  A Review of Predictive Analytics Solutions for Sepsis Patients.

Authors:  Andrew K Teng; Adam B Wilcox
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 2.342

6.  Identifying the relative importance of predictors of survival in out of hospital cardiac arrest: a machine learning study.

Authors:  Nooraldeen Al-Dury; Annica Ravn-Fischer; Jacob Hollenberg; Johan Israelsson; Per Nordberg; Anneli Strömsöe; Christer Axelsson; Johan Herlitz; Araz Rawshani
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Development and validation of a novel prediction model to identify patients in need of specialized trauma care during field triage: design and rationale of the GOAT study.

Authors:  Rogier van der Sluijs; Thomas P A Debray; Martijn Poeze; Loek P H Leenen; Mark van Heijl
Journal:  Diagn Progn Res       Date:  2019-06-20

Review 8.  A Review of Data Quality Assessment in Emergency Medical Services.

Authors:  Mehrnaz Mashoufi; Haleh Ayatollahi; Davoud Khorasani-Zavareh
Journal:  Open Med Inform J       Date:  2018-05-31

9.  Real-time forecasting of emergency department arrivals using prehospital data.

Authors:  Andreas Asheim; Lars P Bache-Wiig Bjørnsen; Lars E Næss-Pleym; Oddvar Uleberg; Jostein Dale; Sara M Nilsen
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2019-08-05

10.  Automated Hierarchy Evaluation System of Large Vessel Occlusion in Acute Ischemia Stroke.

Authors:  Jia You; Anderson C O Tsang; Philip L H Yu; Eva L H Tsui; Pauline P S Woo; Carrie S M Lui; Gilberto K K Leung
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 4.081

View more
  1 in total

1.  Artificial intelligence decision points in an emergency department.

Authors:  Hansol Chang; Won Chul Cha
Journal:  Clin Exp Emerg Med       Date:  2022-09-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.