Emergency department visits due to hand trauma and subsequent emergency hand surgery in three Finnish hospitals during the first and second waves of COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTIONS: The rate of acute hand trauma visits to emergency departments (ED) and surgeries decreased during the COVID-19 lockdown. Our aim was to analyze the influence of national lockdown during the first wave and the regional restrictions during the second wave on the rate of visits to the ED and urgent hand surgeries in Finland.
METHODS: Material for this retrospective study was gathered from three Finnish hospitals All ED visits and urgent or emergency surgeries from January 2017 to December 2020 were included. Incidences per 100 000 persons with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated and compared by incidence rate ratios (IRR).
RESULTS: The incidence of hand injury was lower after the beginning of the lockdown in March 2020 (IRR 0.70 CI 0.63-0.78). After lockdown ended in May, the monthly incidences of ED visits returned to the reference level. During the lockdown, the incidence of fractures and dislocations was 42% lower in March (IRR 0.58 CI 0.50-0.68) and 33% lower in April 2020 (IRR 0.67 CI 0.57-0.80). The incidence of fracture repair surgeries was 43% lower in March 2020 (IRR 0.57 CI 0.35-0.93) and 41% lower in July 2020 (IRR 0.59 CI 0.36-0.98). Incidence of replantation was 49% higher in March 2020 (IRR 1.49 CI 0.53-4.20) and 200% higher in July 2020 (IRR 3.00 CI 0.68-13.2) but these increases had high uncertainty.
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of ED visits due to hand injuries decreased while the rate of emergency hand operations remained unchanged during the national COVID-19 lockdown in spring. After the lockdown, the incidences returned to reference level and were unaffected by regional restrictions during the second wave of pandemic.

Introduction

On March 12, 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a global pandemic [1]. In Finland, the Government declared a state of emergency and nationwide lockdown and implemented several measures to enforce social distancing on March 16. These measures included a ban on social gatherings of more than 10 persons, the closure of external borders, and Finnish citizens returning from abroad were ordered to stay in quarantine at home for two weeks. In addition, public institutions, including primary schools, were closed and working remotely from home, where possible, was encouraged. These restrictions remained in force until the end of May 2020 [2]. As the second wave began in September 2020 in Finland, were regional stepwise restrictions used instead of nationwide lockdown.

Although surgical societies have provided guidelines on how to treat and operate surgical patients with COVID-19 [3,4], the effects of social restrictions on the demand for surgical care is not well understood. Following the start of the nationwide lockdown in the UK in March 2020, the rate of hand traumas referred to the Hand Trauma Clinic in London decreased by 75%, after which rates slowly returned to normal during April [5]. Another recent French study from Paris reported that although the overall rate of hand injuries decreased during the lockdown, domestic hand injuries increased when compared to the rate in 2019, whereas work-related injuries decreased. Moreover, a larger proportion of the patients admitted with hand injuries in Paris required operative treatment in 2020 (52%) compared to the corresponding dates in 2019 (37%) [6]. Trauma operations decreased by 30% in Finnish children during the first wave of the pandemic, but the decrease was mainly due to reduced rates of lower limb injuries, whereas the rate of upper limb operations remained nearly unchanged compared to pre-pandemic era [7]. The association between lockdown and change in the risk for hand injury is not straightforward because the majority of hand injuries occur in domestic or other everyday situations, and therefore the rate did not slow down during the lockdown [8].

The aim of our study was to describe the influence of the national lockdown, social distancing, regional restrictions and remote working on the number of visits to emergency departments and emergency or urgent hand surgeries performed during the first and second waves COVID-19 pandemic in Finland. The identification of changes in injury patterns and the subsequent demand for surgical care are important factors in the planning of the optimal use of resources during a national state of emergency.

Materials and methods

The data for this multicenter, retrospective study were collected from three Finnish hospitals that provide primary, secondary and tertiary care. These hospitals cover a total catchment area of 900 000 residents, which accounts for 1/6th of the Finnish population [9]. Moreover, the catchment area for replantation and revascularization surgery at these hospitals comprises a population of over three million residents (more than half of the population). Thus, the three hospitals are representative of the Finnish population as a whole. Data on all visits to the emergency department (ED) due to hand injuries and all emergency or urgent (operated within 7 days after referral) hand operations were collected from 1.1.2017 to 31.12.2020. We included patients 16 years of age and more at the time of the injury.

Hand injury was defined as an injury to the distal forearm, wrist, or hand. The Finnish version of the Nomesco surgical procedural codes 10 [10], ICD-10 diagnosis codes, and patient characteristics were collected from the electronic patient information systems of the participating hospitals using data management software. (Table 1) Hand injuries were further classified as minor injuries (skin wounds, sprains, bruises), fractures and dislocations, tendon injuries (flexor or extensor), or major injuries (injuries requiring emergency vascular repair or replantation). The healthcare system in Finland is publicly funded and accessible for all emergency patients. All emergency patients requiring hand surgery have access to operative treatment in public hospitals. We retrieved daily number of positive COVID-19 cases from the open access data of the Finnish Institute of Health and Welfare, available online from ww.thl.fi/en.

Table 1

Included operations based on the Nomesco surgical procedure classification and included diagnoses based on the international classification of diseases-10.

Procedure code	Explanation
NDP10	Replantation of hand
NDP12	Replantation of a digit
NDP18	Replantation of several digits
NDP30	Repair of wrist or hand by transplant of tissue
NDP32	Repair of finger or fingers by transplant of tissue
NDL30	Suture or reinsertion of tendon of wrist or hand, flexor tendon
NDL32	Suture or reinsertion of tendon of wrist or hand, extensor tendon
NDL34	Suture or reinsertion of tendon of wrist or hand, other tendon
NDJ60	Internal fixation of fracture of wrist or hand with screw
NDJ62	Internal fixation of fracture of wrist or hand using plate and screws, scaphoid
NDJ64	Internal fixation of fracture of wrist or hand wire, rod, cerclage or pin
Diagnose code
S52.5	Fracture of lower end of radius
S52.6	Fracture of lower end of both ulna and radius
S60.0 –S60.9	Superficial injury of wrist and hand
S61.0 –S61.8	Open wound of wrist and hand
S62.0 –S62.8	Fracture at wrist and hand level
S63.0 –S63.9	Dislocation, sprain and strain of joints and ligaments at wrist and hand level
S64.0 –S64.9	Injury of nerves at wrist and hand level
S65.0 –S65.9	Injury of blood vessels at wrist and hand level
S66.0 –S66.9	Injury of muscle and tendon at wrist and hand level
S67	Crushing injury of wrist and hand
S68.0 –S68.9	Traumatic amputation of wrist and hand
S69	Other and unspecified injuries of wrist and hand

Clinical and demographic data have been presented as means and standard deviations (SD) or as counts and percentages. Monthly incidences with 95% confidence intervals (CI) per 100 000 persons were calculated by using the Poisson exact method. Data from the year 2020 were compared with reference years 2017–2019 by using incidence rate ratios (IRR). The analyses were performed using R version 4.0.4 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

Ethics

According to the Finnish research legislation and The Finnish National Board on Research Integrity, appointed by the Ministry of Education and Culture: "The review of the ethics committee is not required for the research of public and published data, registry and documentary data and archive data.". https://tenk.fi/en/advice-and-materials/guidelines-ethical-review-human-sciences. The Ethics Committee of Tampere University Hospital has waived ethical evaluation of all register-based studies, in which the participants are not contacted. https://www.tays.fi/en-US/Research_and_development/Ethics_Committee. Institutional permissions were obtained from Chief doctors of each of the participating hospitals to access the hospital discharge register data. Informed consent from patients are not needed when retrospective register data is handled and the participants are not contacted.

Results

During the four-year study period, a total of 32 506 hand injuries were treated in the ED of the participating hospitals, and 2 474 emergency or urgent hand operations were performed. Of these, 6 477 (19.9%) ED visits and 509 (20.5%) surgeries occurred during the pandemic period (from March 2020 to December 2020). The incidence of hand injury was lower before the start of the lockdown in February 2020 when compared with reference years (IRR 0.88 CI 0.78–0.98; Fig 1A), and after the beginning of the lockdown in March 2020 the incidence of ED visits decreased (IRR 0.70 CI 0.63–0.78; Fig 1A). Correspondingly, after the end of May and lockdown, the incidence increased and the monthly incidence peaked and the highest monthly incidence within the study period was reported in June 2020, 98 ED visits per 100 000 person-months (IRR 1.12 CI 1.02–1.24; Fig 1A). After June 2020, the monthly incidences of ED visits due to hand injuries remained at the reference level (Fig 1A). The age and gender distribution of ED patients remained unchanged in year 2020 (Table 1).

Fig 1

A Monthly incidences of emergency department visits due hand injuries. Blue line with 95% confidence intervals (light blue) presents year 2020 and black line presents the average incidence for reference years 2017–2019. B Monthly incidences of emergency department visits due hand injuries stratified by the diagnose of the visit. Blue line with 95% confidence intervals (light blue) present year 2020 and black line presents the average incidence for reference years 2017–2019.

The most common reasons for ED visit were minor hand injuries followed by fractures and dislocations of the hand or wrist. The incidences of minor injuries were 16% lower in March during the lockdown (IRR 0.84 CI 0.71–0.99; Fig 1B). The most prominent change during the lockdown was seen in the incidence of fractures and dislocations which was 42% lower in March (IRR 0.58 CI 0.50–0.68) and 33% lower in April 2020 (IRR 0.67 CI 0.57–0.80) than in the reference years (Fig 1B). After the lockdown both minor and major injuries shifted back to the level of reference years (Fig 1B).

The overall incidence trend of emergent and urgent hand operations in 2020 was similar to reference years Fig 2A. Men were more likely to sustain hand injury requiring operative treatment (Table 2). The lockdown did not increase the proportion of patients waiting for operation over 48 hours after the referral (Table 2). During the lockdown the rate of replantation was 49% higher in March 2020 than in the reference years (IRR 1.49 CI 0.53–4.20; Fig 2B), and in July 2020, the rate of replantation was 200% higher (IRR 3.00 CI 0.68–13.2; Fig 2B), but these findings have high uncertainty. On the contrary, the incidence of fracture repair was 43% lower in March 2020 (IRR 0.57 CI 0.35–0.93; Fig 2B) and 41% lower in July 2020 (IRR 0.59 CI 0.36–0.98; Fig 2B). The incidences of tendon repairs in 2020 were similar to reference years (Fig 2B).

Fig 2

A Monthly incidences of emergency and urgent hand operations. Blue line with 95% confidence intervals (light blue) present year 2020 and black line presents the average incidence for reference years 2017–2019. B Monthly incidences of emergency and urgent hand operations stratified by the operation type. Blue line with 95% confidence intervals (light blue) present year 2020 and black line presents the average incidence for reference years 2017–2019.

Table 2

Demographic data of the ED visits due hand injuries and subsequent hand operations, 2020 compared with mean of reference years 2017–2019.

Time stratified by the national lockdown and regional restrictions in effect during the first and second waves of COVID-19 pandemic in Finland.

	Before Lockdown January to February		Lockdown March to May		After lockdown June to August		Regional restrictions September to December
	2020	2017–2019	2020	2017–2019	2020	2017–2019	2020	2017–2019
	N (%)	N (%)	N (%)	N (%)	N (%)	N (%)	N (%)	N (%)
Total ED visits	1 238 (100)	1 302 (100)	1 747 (100)	2 178 (100)	2 399 (100)	2 297 (100)	2 331 (100)	1 921 (100)
Gender male	615 (49.7)	635 (48.7)	950 (54.4)	1 099 (50.5)	1 373 (57.2)	1 337 (58.2)	1 233 (52.9)	1 307 (52.7)
Age, mean (SD)	41.1 (23)	41.8 (23)	42.5 (23)	42.2 (23)	41.5 (24)	40.5 (24)	40.4 (24)	40.8 (23)
ED visit diagnose
Minor injury	550 (44.4)	558 (42.8)	904 (51.7)	972 (44.5)	1 257 (52.4)	1 193 (52.0)	1 210 (51.9)	1 255 (50.6)
Fractures and dislocations	637 (51.5)	695 (53.3)	752 (43.0)	1 100 (50.5)	1 029 (42.9)	983 (42.8)	1 000 (42.9)	1 115 (45.8)
Tendon injury	26 (2.1)	27 (2.1)	41 (2.3)	53 (2.4)	46 (1.9)	64 (2.8)	49 (2.1)	62 (2.5)
Major injury	25 (2.0)	23 (1.8)	50 (2.9)	58 (2.7)	67 (2.8)	57 (2.4)	72 (3.1)	48 (1.9)
Total operations	83 (6.7)	93 (7.2)	155 (8.9)	169 (7.8)	160 (6.7)	183 (8.0)	194 (8.3)	182 (9.5)
Gender male	62 (74.7)	58 (62.4)	110 (71.0)	117 (69.2)	129 (80.6)	137 (74.9)	135 (69.6)	129 (70.9)
Age, mean (SD)	37.9 (19)	42.9 (21)	45.5 (19)	44.6 (20)	41.1 (19)	40.6 (20)	40.7 (19)	41.0 (19)
Operation
Fracture repair	57 (68.7)	65 (69.9)	92 (59.4)	112 (66.2)	105 (65.6)	125 (68.3)	134 (69.1)	116 (63.8)
Replantation	4 (4.8)	4 (4.3)	16 (10.3)	15 (8.9)	13 (8.2)	9 (4.9)	11 (5.7)	10 (5.5)
Tendon repair	22 (26.5)	24 (25.8)	47 (30.3)	42 (24.9)	42 (26.2)	49 (26.8)	49 (25.2)	56 (30.7)
Waiting time from ED to OR <48h	44 (53.1)	63 (67.7)	111 (71.6)	116 (68.6)	102 (63.8)	125 (68.3)	105 (54.1)	126 (69.2)

The daily number of positive COVID-19 findings is presented in Fig 3. During the first wave the testing capacity was limited, but during the second way testing capacity was in full use.

Fig 3

Daily number of PCR test-positive COVID-19 findings in Finland in 2020.

Discussion

The national COVID-19 lockdown seemed to have a clear decreasing impact on the rate of visits to the ED due to hand injuries during the first wave of COVID-19. The decrease was mainly due the reduced number of fractures and dislocations during the lockdown as the other injury types remained unchanged. The overall rate of emergency or urgent hand operations remained unchanged during the lockdown in Finland, despite the clear decrease in the rate of fracture repairs. A high, but uncertain, increase was seen in the number of replantation or revascularization operations after the start of the lockdown. However, this increase may be a non-specific change, and a similar temporal variation was also observed in the data from the reference years. The rate of revascularizations was again higher after the lockdown during the summer, when restrictions were lifted, but also this finding had high uncertainty. When compared to the major decreases seen in the rate of referrals to hand trauma units after the start of the lockdown in London (75% decrease) and Paris (67% decrease), our results were less dramatic; the maximum monthly decrease in the referral rate during the lockdown was 30%, which was mainly due the reduced rate of fractures [5,6]. It must be noted that the first wave of COVID-19 was much milder in Finland. Our results in adults reflects the previous report over Finnish children, which demonstrated that the rate of operatively treated upper limb traumas remained nearly unchanged during the first wave of the pandemic [7].

The profile and etiology of hand and wrist trauma is likely to vary between countries and demonstrates that country-specific characteristics exist. For example, in Finland the trauma profile varies by the season. The Finnish winter is slippery due to ice and snow, which can be seen in the increase in wrist and hand fractures [11,12]. However, more hand fractures occur among children during warm summer days [13,14]. In recent years, there has been increasing rates of falls from roofs due to snow clearing and a specific type of thumb avulsion injury caused by motorized ice drill accidents in Finland [15,16].

The COVID-19 lockdown was introduced introduced in mid-March. At the time of the lockdown beginning the winter holiday period was over in Southern Finland. The country is relatively large with changing weather and the winter season ends over a month earlier in Southern part than in the Northern. In early April many families start the summer cabin season in the south parts of the Finland and begin do-it-yourself renovations and wood chopping preparings for the next winter [17]. There is no information on the specific incidence of injuries caused by chopping firewood in Finland, but a total of 67 amputation or crush injuries caused by powered log splitters were operated during a two-year period in the TAUH region [18]. In Germany, 80% of saw injuries take place outside of work and half of the injuries are related to cutting firewood [19]. Powered cutting tools are more likely to cause injuries than an axe, which has been reported to relate to only 10% of the hospitalized wood chopping injuries [20].

Although, the overall incidence of hand injuries decreased during the lockdown, the overall rate of emergent and urgent hand operations remained constant during lockdown. Small decrease was seen in February before the lockdown and in March during the lockdown in the incidence of fracture operation, which may be explained by the weather in addition to the lockdown. The possible decrease in the rate of traffic and work-related hand injuries may have been augmented by an increase in the rate of domestic hand injuries and thus explain the unchanged incidence of severe hand injuries. According to a previous Nordic study, 36% of hand injuries occur at home, 36% during leisure activities, and 26% at work [8]. In Finland, however, work-related injuries are rare. According to the Finnish Workers’ Compensation Center, the incidence of work-related traumas in Finland was 29 per million working hours in 2019. Moreover, nearly 80% of injuries leading to absence from work occur outside the workplace, typically at home. In 2020, the incidence of traumatic injuries at work seemed to be lower during the lockdown period in comparison with 2019, which may be explained by the decrease in traffic and other activities with an increased risk of injury [21]. The decrease in traffic also led to a decrease in traffic accidents and traffic deaths from April through to May 2020 compared to the ten previous years [22].

When the lockdown restrictions were lifted in June 2020, the injury patterns returned to normal. People returned to workplaces instead of remote working from home, and restrictions on public institutions and social gathering were eased during the summer due to low pandemic phase. When the second wave began in September 2020 regional restrictions came into effect. The difference, when compared with lockdown, was that regional restrictions were aimed towards the adult population. Operation of restaurants and bars was restricted, remote working was recommended, and hobbies and activities were not banned but some restrictions were enforced. These applied regional restrictions had no observable impact on the incidences of ED visits due hand injuries or emergency hand operations.

The strength of the study was the public and practically free healthcare system in Finland that allows patients to seek medical assistance whenever needed and thus the data reflects most likely true incidences. A minor limitation is the lack of information on private health care facilities, in which a small proportion of minor hand traumas have been treated. However, practically all major traumas and traumas needing acute surgery are treated in public hospitals. Another limitation of our study was that we only had information on the diagnoses and external causes of the visits to the ED or operation, and we were thus unable to classify the injuries by specific etiology and occurring site.

The nationwide COVID-19 lockdown decreased the rate of visits to the ED due to hand injuries in three Finnish hospitals, but the rate of emergency and urgent hand operations remained unchanged during the lockdown. As the restrictions were eased, the visit rates returned to the level of reference years. Enforcing a variety of regional restrictions had no observable impact on the hand injuries during the second wave of COVID-19 in Finland. Most likely this was due to less strict restrictions and therefore, for example, many employers were back to workplaces, sports facilities were mainly open, and domestic traveling was more accepted, whereas during the lockdown all of these were recommended against. Compared to other countries Finland had one of the lowest daily numbers of positive cases in 2020 and this is most likely a contributing factor to these results, as the daily numbers most likely reflect to behavior and risk taking, and Finland did not need a curfew, which most likely would have reduced the trauma rates.

The identification of regional changes in injury patterns and the subsequent demand for surgical care are important factors in ensuring the effective treatment of hand injuries in the ED and operation room. The findings of this study will therefore provide better tools for the planning of the optimal and sustainable use of resources during a future national state of emergency.

8 Oct 2021

16 Oct 2021

Reviewer #1: Although the number of emergency outpatients was reduced due to the lockdown, the number of surgeries did not seem to have changed significantly compared to before the pandemic. Since all patients can receive medical care in Finland's medical system, the strength of this study is that the numbers given in this study can be regarded as actual numbers.

On the other hand, compared to reports from other countries such as the United Kingdom and France, there seems to be little change in the number of emergency outpatients and the number of surgeries. This is thought to be affected by the number of people infected with COVID-19. In other words, since the number of COVID-19-infected persons is smaller in Finland than in France and the United Kingdom, it is considered that this pandemic had less impact on society such as emergency outpatient visits and surgery.

In this study, lockdown and regional restrictions are clarified in the figure, but it is easy for the reader to understand that they also include data on changes in the number of infected people in Finland.

Author answer: We would like to thank reviewer 1 for these comments.

Reviewer #2: This is an interesting and important research of the effect of COVID19 to hand trauma in Finland. Despite being a regional study, the enrollment is satisfactory in making generalization. As main findings, the researchers report that hand traumas decreased in the national lockdown, but thereafter increased to the reference level despite the later regional restrictions. Another important finding was that national lockdown didn't decrease the emergency operations.

The study is impotant and it adds the literature. The study is in the scope of the Journal. Language is good, the structure, figures and tables are sound. However, there are some minor point that I hope the authors would still consider for the revision:

- you conclude that all hand traumas have been treated in public hospitals. Perhaps some of them have been treated in private hospitals? This should be discussed in the manuscript, albeit it will not change the main findings and the value of the study.

Author answer: Thank you for this important point. We have now revised the sentence and included this as a limitation for our study (lines 186-189).

- it is unclear, if the entire population, including children and adolescents, are included. There is variation in the study country regarding the in-hopsital treatment of childhood hand trauma; are they admitted to the dep. of pediatric surgery and orthopaedics or to the dep. of hand surgery. Please, define that in the revision.

Author answer: Again, an excellent point which needs to be clarifed. We included only patients aged 16 or more. This has been added to methods (lines 77-78).

- There has been one previous study of childhood trauma (including hand) in pediatric patients in the study country (A. Raitio et al, SJS 2020), which should be cited, to my opinion.

Author answer: Thank you for this suggestion. We have now cited this study (reference 7) and added this in introduction and discussion (lines 59-61 and 142-144).

- Regarding the results, I think the incidence of replantantion emergency operations didn't change, while looking to the great confidence intervals of the IRRs. Therefore, the results and the conclusion concerning the change of IRR of replantantions should be re-written more carefully.

Author answer: We have now revised the interpretation of replantations, please see abstract (line 35), results (line 125) and discussion (lines 134 and 138).

- It sounds little odd that summer cabin season starts in March in Finland. At the time of the first lockdown, the winter holidays were just starting. Perhaps some clarification about the large country and the potential variation in the study country, between the northern and southern parts of the country, could be added.

Author answer: This is a good point and we have now added more information and context to discussion (lines 151-155).

- As a part of final conclusions, I would like to see little more deductive speculation, why regional restrictions didn't decrease hand trauma.

Author answer: We have updated the conclusion section as suggested (lines 196-198).

In conclusion, this is very interesting study and I suggest publication after abovementioned minor repairs.

Author answer: We would like to thank reviewer 2 for the kind words and excellent suggestions!

7 Dec 2021

9 Dec 2021

Reviewer #1: It is reported that the impact of COVID-19 on the hand trauma of the emergency outpatient clinic in Finland was small. Since the number of people infected with COVID-19 in Finland is smaller than in other countries, the impact of pandemic on daily life seems to be suppressed.

I commented last time that the number of COVID-19 infected people in Finland during study period should be included for reader to understand easily, but no data has been added.

Author answer: Thank you for this suggestion. We have now included Figure 3, which includes daily number of positive COVID-19 cases in Finland in 2020. We have updated the methods, results, discussion and figure legends section now.

20 Jan 2022

Emergency department visits due to hand trauma and subsequent emergency hand surgery in three Finnish hospitals during the first and second waves of COVID-19 pandemic

PONE-D-21-10154R2

Dear Dr. Kuitunen,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Gabriel de Araújo, M.D., MSc

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

24 Jan 2022

PONE-D-21-10154R2

Emergency department visits due to hand trauma and subsequent emergency hand surgery in three Finnish hospitals during the first and second waves of COVID-19 pandemic

Dear Dr. Kuitunen:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Professor Gabriel de Araújo

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE