Literature DB >> 3510823

Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled comparison of nicardipine and nifedipine in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris.

M J Bowles, N S Khurmi, M J O'Hara, E B Raftery.   

Abstract

Forty-one patients were studied in a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial to compare the antianginal actions of nicardipine 30 mg thrice daily and nifedipine 10 mg thrice daily. Efficacy was assessed using objective criteria from computer-assisted multistage graded exercise testing, performed after a two-week placebo run-in period and at the end of each four-week active treatment period. Thirty-seven patients completed both legs of the crossover trial. The mean (+/- standard error of the mean) baseline exercise time to development of angina was 6.7 +/- 0.4 min and this increased to 9.5 +/- 0.6 min on nicardipine (p less than 0.001) and 9.5 +/- 0.5 min on nifedipine (p less than 0.001 vs baseline; NS vs nicardipine). Both drugs significantly prolonged the time to the development of 1mm ST segment depression. The baseline resting heart rate of 83 +/- 2 beats/min increased to 87 +/- 3 beats/min during nicardipine (p less than 0.05) and remained unaltered at 83 +/- 2 beats/min during nifedipine therapy (p = NS vs baseline and p less than 0.02 vs nicardipine). Similarly, both drugs increased significantly the maximal heart rate at peak exercise. One patient was lost to follow-up during the placebo run-in period and four patients (two each on nicardipine and nifedipine) were withdrawn due to adverse effects. Our results indicate that nicardipine is comparable in efficacy to nifedipine and has a similar adverse effect profile and can also be considered a useful therapeutic agent for the treatment of chronic stable angina pectoris.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3510823     DOI: 10.1378/chest.89.2.260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  7 in total

Review 1.  Calcium channel antagonists: Part VI: Clinical pharmacokinetics of first and second-generation agents.

Authors:  L H Opie
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 2.  'Second generation' dihydropyridine calcium antagonists. Greater vascular selectivity and some unique applications.

Authors:  D D Freedman; D D Waters
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Tiapamil, a new calcium channel blocking agent for the treatment of effort induced chronic stable angina pectoris.

Authors:  N S Khurmi; C W Robinson; M J O'Hara; E B Raftery
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 4.  Nicardipine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy, in the treatment of angina pectoris, hypertension and related cardiovascular disorders.

Authors:  E M Sorkin; S P Clissold
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Comparative effects of prolonged therapy with four calcium ion antagonists (diltiazem, nicardipine, tiapamil and verapamil) in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris.

Authors:  N S Khurmi; E B Raftery
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.727

6.  A randomized double-blind crossover study of nicardipine and nifedipine in patients with angina pectoris and concomitant essential hypertension.

Authors:  M Metra; S Nodari; G Nordio; L Bonandi; R Raddino; P Feroldi; L Dei Cas; O Visioli
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 7.  North of England evidence based guidelines development project: summary version of evidence based guideline for the primary care management angina. North of England Stable Angina Guideline Development Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-03-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.