| Literature DB >> 35107318 |
Chenlin Hu1, Gary Fong2, Sebastian Wurster3, Dimitrios P Kontoyiannis3, Nicholas D Beyda1,4.
Abstract
Here, we report two paired sets of an index wild-type Candida glabrata bloodstream isolate and subsequent echinocandin-resistant FKS mutant. One paired set exhibited a higher proportion of clumping cells and was more virulent in the invertebrate host Galleria mellonella than the other paired set. No virulence difference between the paired index and FKS strains was observed. These findings imply a potential link of clumping morphology with virulence in C. glabrata that is uncoupled from FKS-mediated echinocandin resistance. IMPORTANCE Candida glabrata is a leading cause of invasive candidiasis. In contrast to other species, it has a high propensity for developing resistance to echinocandins, which are the first-line treatment. Unlike the dimorphic Candida albicans which can grow invasive filamentous hyphae, C. glabrata lacks this ability. Here, we report a link between virulence and clumping cell morphology in two different sets of clinical C. glabrata strains obtained from patients failing echinocandin therapy. One set of paired strains (echinocandin-susceptible and subsequent resistant mutant) had a high proportion of clumping cells in the population and were significantly more virulent than another set which had fewer clumping cells. Additionally, we corroborate that echinocandin resistance does not impart a significant fitness cost. Our findings suggest that clumping morphology may be an important but previously underestimated virulence factor for C. glabrata and also aid our understand for the high prevalence of resistance observed in this species.Entities:
Keywords: Candida glabrata; chitin; echinocandin resistance; morphology; virulence; yeast
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35107318 PMCID: PMC8809326 DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.01837-21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiol Spectr ISSN: 2165-0497
In vitro features of two pairs of clinical C. glabrata strains
| Strain | Patient | FKS genotype | Area of cells with ≥3 buds (μm2) | Growth rate (h−1) | Doubling time (h) | Chitin | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count | Mean ± SD | Min.–max. | Median | ||||||
| A1 | A | WT | 918 | 66 ± 38 | 37–892 | 60 | 0.45 ± 0.02 | 1.55 ± 0.06 | 347 ± 154 |
| A2 | A | FKS2-S663P | 1015 | 67 ± 39 | 32–831 | 61 | 0.46 ± 0.01 | 1.50 ± 0.04 | 445 ± 162 |
| B1 | B | WT | 1816 | 77 ± 32 | 34–469 | 70 | 0.39 ± 0.02 | 1.80 ± 0.08 | 256 ± 97 |
| B2 | B | FKS2-S663P | 2622 | 85 ± 47 | 36–884 | 73 | 0.36 ± 0.02 | 1.91 ± 0.11 | 417 ± 165 |
Cell wall chitin was analyzed via indirectly measuring the fluorescence intensity of calcofluor white (CFW)-stained C. glabrata, with arbitrary units (AU).
FIG 1Summary of experimental findings. (A) Representative images of unbudded C. glabrata cells and yeast cells with different numbers of buds (1, 2, and ≥3) obtained using imaging flow cytometry. The yeast cells were stained with calcofluor white (CFW). The brightfield (BF), CFW, and BF+CFW represent the yeast BF image collected in channel 1, the CFW fluorescent image collected in channel 7, and the composite of BF and CFW fluorescent merged images, respectively. (B) Proportion of clumping cells for each C. glabrata strain; each measurement was performed in duplicate. (C) Survival curves of Galleria mellonella infected with each C. glabrata strain.