Literature DB >> 35106696

Capturing of intracranial pressure treatment during neurointensive care in patients with acute brain injury using a novel tablet-based method.

Peter Galos1,2, Lena Nyholm3, Tim Howells3, Per Enblad3.   

Abstract

Critical care is complex and stressful. It is difficult to register in real time data not recorded by automatic systems. Time-specific knowledge of manual measures is important for understanding pathophysiology and for analyzing treatment and quality of care. Therefore, a novel iPad-based method for registration of manual measures was developed, which many can build themselves. Using a configuration for intracranial pressure (ICP) management, the methodology was validated, ICP treatment captured, and the quality of ICP management evaluated. Twenty-two patients with acute brain injuries were studied. The iPad-system was totally used for 2538 h. Thirteen-hundred-five manual measures were entered. Thirty-nine episodes of predefined ICP insults were identified. During 16/39 episodes, ICP treatments were registered. For 4/39 episodes treatments were registered within 90 s before or after the episode. For 3/39 episodes it was registered that treatment was intentionally refrained. In 15/16 episodes without registered treatment, the insult was mild or reasonable explanations were found when medical records and the Patient data management system were reviewed. In one situation without particular circumstances, morphine and clonidine were given to decrease ICP but not registered. No episodes of downtime or loss of data occurred. The developed methodology appears to be stable and robust as well as feasible and user-friendly. It was possible to capture the treatment of ICP insults with high temporal resolution, and to evaluate the quality of ICP management. An own developed novel tablet-based system like our system may be a promising potential tool useful in various future intensive care applications.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Critical care; Intracranial pressure; Manual measures; Registration system; Treatment

Year:  2022        PMID: 35106696     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-022-00820-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  3 in total

1.  Immunobiology of primary intracranial tumors. Part 3: Microcytotoxicity assays of specific immune responses of brain tumor patients.

Authors:  R E Woosley; M S Mahaley; J L Mahaley; G M Miller; W H Brooks
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  The brain monitoring with Information Technology (BrainIT) collaborative network: EC feasibility study results and future direction.

Authors:  Ian Piper; Iain Chambers; Giuseppe Citerio; Per Enblad; Barbara Gregson; Tim Howells; Karl Kiening; Julia Mattern; Pelle Nilsson; Arminas Ragauskas; Juan Sahuquillo; Rob Donald; Richard Sinnott; Anthony Stell
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 2.216

3.  Outcome after traumatic brain injury improved by an organized secondary insult program and standardized neurointensive care.

Authors:  Kristin Elf; Pelle Nilsson; Per Enblad
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 7.598

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.