Literature DB >> 3510613

An update of the indications for penetrating keratoplasty. 1979 through 1983.

J B Robin, J J Gindi, K Koh, D J Schanzlin, N A Rao, K K York, R E Smith.   

Abstract

We performed a retrospective analysis of the clinical and pathologic diagnoses of 497 corneal buttons that had been submitted to the Estelle Doheny Eye Pathology Laboratory, Los Angeles, during the five-year period 1979 through 1983. The leading indications, in order of decreasing frequency, were pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (17.5%), regrafts (15.1%), aphakic bullous keratopathy (10.9%), corneal trauma (9.3%), and Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy (9.1%). The emergence of pseudophakic bullous keratopathy as the most common cause for penetrating keratoplasty correlates well with the dramatic increase in the number of cataract extractions with intraocular lens implantations performed since the mid-1970s. Less frequent indications for penetrating keratoplasty included the following: corneal scars (6%); active ulcerative keratitis (7%); keratoconus (6%); keratitis secondary to virus (5%); non-Fuchs' corneal dystrophies (3%); congenital corneal opacities (3%); interstitial keratitis (2%); and chemical burns (1%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3510613     DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1986.01050130097029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  9 in total

1.  Penetrating keratoplasty: indications over a 10 year period.

Authors:  N Al-Yousuf; I Mavrikakis; E Mavrikakis; S M Daya
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 2.  Adult keratoplasty: has the prognosis improved in the last 25 years?

Authors:  Francis W Price; Marianne O Price
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  A comparative analysis over a decade of the changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty in Ireland.

Authors:  L M Collum; J Mullaney; M A McDermott; M Hillery; P Mullaney
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  Penetrating keratoplasty for pseudophakic corneal oedema.

Authors:  J Kwartz; B Leatherbarrow; P Dyer; A E Ridgway; A B Tullo
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  An analysis of corneal endothelial and graft survival in pseudophakic bullous keratopathy.

Authors:  A Sugar
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1989

6.  Implantation of scleral fixated sutured posterior chamber lenses: a retrospective analysis of 119 cases.

Authors:  Lothar Krause; Nikolaos E Bechrakis; Heinrich Heimann; Stefan Salditt; Michael H Foerster
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 2.031

7.  Indications and outcome of repeat penetrating keratoplasty in India.

Authors:  M Vanathi; Namrata Sharma; Rajesh Sinha; Radhika Tandon; Jeewan S Titiyal; Rasik B Vajpayee
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-11-02       Impact factor: 2.209

Review 8.  Ganciclovir ophthalmic gel 0.15% for the treatment of acute herpetic keratitis: background, effectiveness, tolerability, safety, and future applications.

Authors:  Timothy Y Chou; Bennett Y Hong
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 2.423

9.  Phacoemulsification and IOL-Implantation without Using Viscoelastics: Combined Modeling of Thermo Fluid Dynamics, Clinical Outcomes, and Endothelial Cell Density.

Authors:  Nikola Goles; Marko Nerancic; Sanja Konjik; Brigitte Pajic-Eggspuehler; Bojan Pajic; Zeljka Cvejic
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 3.576

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.