| Literature DB >> 35106111 |
Maria Gladkikh1,2, Dimitri A Parra3,4.
Abstract
This case report describes a neonate with an antenatally diagnosed vascular anomaly of the liver. Ultrasound at birth confirmed an arterioportal fistula communicating the left hepatic artery and an anterior branch of the right portal vein. Computer tomography angiography on day 7 of life redemonstrated the arterioportal fistula and defined the vascular anatomy for potential treatment. Transarterial embolization of the arterioportal fistula was performed at 3 weeks of life using an MVP Microvascular Plug System 3Q (Reverse Medical Corp, Irvine, CA, USA). Intra-procedural angiography showed successful occlusion of the fistula, patency of the portal vein with hepatopetal flow, and patency of the hepatic artery with no signs of arterial or venous thrombosis. There were no intra- or post-procedure complications. Multiple follow-up ultrasounds at 1-13 months showed stable occlusion of the embolized fistula with no evidence of recanalization, with the patient having a normal life and no sequelae. This case illustrates a successful novel approach to manage the rare condition of a solitary hepatic arterioportal fistula in a neonate using the MVP system. Current literature on congenital arterioportal fistulas and the MVP system is reviewed.Entities:
Keywords: Arterioportal fistula; CHM, congenital heart malformation; CT, computed tomography; HA, hepatic artery; IAPF, intrahepatic arterioportal fistula; Liver embolization; MVP, Micro Vascular Plug; Microvascular plug system; Neonatal hepatic vascular malformation; PTFE, polytetrafluoroethylene; Pediatric intervention; TAE, transarterial embolization; US, ultrasound
Year: 2022 PMID: 35106111 PMCID: PMC8784292 DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2021.12.065
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Radiol Case Rep ISSN: 1930-0433
Fig. 1Gray-scale and color-Doppler US on day 1 of life showing: (A) Prominent celiac trunk (arrow) and an enlarged common hepatic artery (arrowhead). (B) Saccular structure with smooth margins (arrows) located in the central superior portion of the liver and in contact with the anterior liver capsule. (C) Prominent vascular flow within the saccular structure was observed, with aliasing artifact reflecting turbulent flow. (D) Very tortuous and prominent left hepatic artery (arrow) which originated the arterial feeder of the vascular anomaly. (E) Vascular channel (white arrow) communicating with the right anterior branch of the right portal vein (black arrows). This constellation of findings was compatible with a congenital intrahepatic arterioportal fistula.
Fig. 2An enhanced CT of the abdomen was performed to better characterized the lesion. (A) Sagittal MIP in arterial phase showing a prominent celiac trunk (black arrow) and enlarged common hepatic artery (black arrowhead). The abdominal aorta below this area showed decreased caliber (white arrows). (B) Axial MIP reformat demonstrating the arterioportal fistula involving segments IVA and VIII. It comprises the arterial feeder (arrowhead), the saccular structure (black arrows), and the portal communicating venous channel (asterisk). The right liver parenchyma showed an earlier opacification with contrast, most likely secondary to the fistula. (C) Axial MIP reformat showing the origin of the arterial feeder from the left hepatic artery (arrowheads) and the junction of the portal communicating venous channel with a branch of the right portal vein (black arrows). (D) Sagital MIP reformat demonstrating the straight portion of the arterial feeder (arrows) and its junction with the saccular structure (arrowhead). The straight trajectory of this portion allowed the deployment of the MVP. (E, F) 3D reconstructions showing the large saccular structure (S), the left hepatic artery (HA) giving rise to the arterial feeder (white arrows) and the draining venous channel to the portal vein (P).
Fig. 3Intra-procedural findings. (A) Gray-scale US pre-embolization showing a mildly decreased caliber of the saccular structure (S) and the straight portion of its arterial feeder (arrows). (B, C, D) Intra-procedure super selective arteriograms in different projections, with the microcatheter positioned at the arterial feeder, showing anatomical details of the arterioportal fistula characterized by the straight portion of the arterial feeder (white arrow), the saccular structure (S) and the draining venous channel (black arrow, P). Satisfactory peripheral portal venous flow was observed (black arrowheads). Short branches were observed from the saccular structure (white arrowhead). (E) Deployment of the MVP within the straight portion of the arterial feeder via the microcatheter. The distal (black arrow) and proximal (white arrow) radiopaque markers were clearly visualized, in an adequate position as determined by previous planning angiograms. The device was deployed with no incidents. (F) Control angiogram 10 minutes after deployment of the MVP (black arrow) demonstrated successful occlusion of the fistula. There was no opacification of the saccular structure or portal branches.
Fig. 4Follow-up gray-scale and color-Doppler US after the procedure. (A, B) On day 1, the MVP was observed (arrows) with no evidence of recanalization. Decreased interval size and flow of the saccular structure (arrowheads) was noted. (C, D) Study after 1 month of the embolization showing unchanged position of the MVP, with decreased vascularity around it and no signs of recanalization. There was a decrease in size of the saccular structure (arrowheads) which showed very poor portal flow. (E, F) Follow-up at 13 months demonstrating normal appearance of the portal vein (PV) and common hepatic artery (curved arrows). The MVP device (arrow) was unchanged in position and there was no evidence of the saccular structure.