Cristina Valdovinos1,2, Giselle Perez-Aguilar3, Roberto Gonzalez Huerta1, Chesca Barrios4, Griselda Gutierrez5, Carmen Mendez5, Anshu Abhat5, Gerardo Moreno6, Arleen Brown4, Alejandra Casillas4. 1. David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA. 2. Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles CA. 3. Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA. 4. Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA. 5. Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, Los Angeles, CA. 6. Department of Family Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Electronic health (eHealth) literacy may affect telehealth uptake, yet few studies have evaluated eHealth literacy in underserved populations. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe technology access and use patterns as well as eHealth literacy levels among English-speaking and LEP patients in a Los Angeles safety net health system. METHODS: Patients, aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and/or hypertension, and their caregivers were recruited from three primary care safety-net clinics in Los Angeles County (California) between June - July 2017. Participants' electronic health literacy was assessed by the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS); participants were also asked about technology access and use. We examined these measures in English-speaking and limited English proficient (LEP) Spanish-speaking patients. RESULTS: A total of 71 participants (62 patients and 9 caregivers) completed the questionnaire. The mean age of the respondents was 56 years old. More than half of participants used a phone that could connect to the Internet (67%). The mean score for 10 eHEALS items was in the moderate range (26/50 points). There was no difference in mean eHEALS between language groups. However, 47% of Spanish-speaking participants "agreed/strongly agreed" that they knew how to use the Internet to answer their health questions, compared to 68% of English-speaking participants (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of patients from a diverse safety net population, perceived skills and confidence in engaging with electronic health systems were low, particularly among LEP Spanish-speakers, despite moderate levels of electronic health literacy. More studies are needed among diverse patient populations to better assess eHealth literacy and patients' digital readiness, and to examine how these patient metrics directly impact telehealth utilization.
BACKGROUND: Electronic health (eHealth) literacy may affect telehealth uptake, yet few studies have evaluated eHealth literacy in underserved populations. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe technology access and use patterns as well as eHealth literacy levels among English-speaking and LEP patients in a Los Angeles safety net health system. METHODS: Patients, aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and/or hypertension, and their caregivers were recruited from three primary care safety-net clinics in Los Angeles County (California) between June - July 2017. Participants' electronic health literacy was assessed by the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS); participants were also asked about technology access and use. We examined these measures in English-speaking and limited English proficient (LEP) Spanish-speaking patients. RESULTS: A total of 71 participants (62 patients and 9 caregivers) completed the questionnaire. The mean age of the respondents was 56 years old. More than half of participants used a phone that could connect to the Internet (67%). The mean score for 10 eHEALS items was in the moderate range (26/50 points). There was no difference in mean eHEALS between language groups. However, 47% of Spanish-speaking participants "agreed/strongly agreed" that they knew how to use the Internet to answer their health questions, compared to 68% of English-speaking participants (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of patients from a diverse safety net population, perceived skills and confidence in engaging with electronic health systems were low, particularly among LEP Spanish-speakers, despite moderate levels of electronic health literacy. More studies are needed among diverse patient populations to better assess eHealth literacy and patients' digital readiness, and to examine how these patient metrics directly impact telehealth utilization.
Authors: Stephen J Lepore; Maria A Rincon; Joanne S Buzaglo; Mitch Golant; Morton A Lieberman; Sarah Bauerle Bass; Suzanne Chambers Journal: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 2.520
Authors: Terhilda Garrido; Michael Kanter; Di Meng; Marianne Turley; Jian Wang; Valerie Sue; Luther Scott Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2015-02-01 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Thomas A Arcury; Joanne C Sandberg; Kathryn P Melius; Sara A Quandt; Xiaoyan Leng; Celine Latulipe; David P Miller; D Alden Smith; Alain G Bertoni Journal: J Appl Gerontol Date: 2018-10-24
Authors: Courtney R Lyles; Urmimala Sarkar; James D Ralston; Nancy Adler; Dean Schillinger; Howard H Moffet; Elbert S Huang; Andrew J Karter Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-05-15 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Bethany Tennant; Michael Stellefson; Virginia Dodd; Beth Chaney; Don Chaney; Samantha Paige; Julia Alber Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2015-03-17 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Hanna Vollbrecht; Vineet M Arora; Sebastian Otero; Kyle A Carey; David O Meltzer; Valerie G Press Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-10-19 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Anshu Abhat; Alejandra Casillas; Anish Mahajan; Gerardo Moreno; Arleen F Brown; Sara Simmons; Peter Szilagyi Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-10-23 Impact factor: 5.428