Literature DB >> 35105604

Exercise prehabilitation during neoadjuvant chemotherapy may enhance tumour regression in oesophageal cancer: results from a prospective non-randomised trial.

Janine Zylstra1,2, Greg P Whyte2,3,4, Kerri Beckmann5, James Pate4, Aida Santaolalla5, Louise Gervais-Andre6, Beth Russell5, Nick Maisey7, Justin Waters8, Gemma Tham9, Jesper Lagergren5, Michael Green10, Mark Kelly1, Cara Baker1, Mieke Van Hemelrijck5, Vicky Goh6, James Gossage1, Mike Browning11, Andrew Davies12,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence for the use of exercise in cancer patients and data supporting enhanced tumour volume reduction following chemotherapy in animal models. To date, there is no reported histopathological evidence of a similar oncological benefit in oesophageal cancer.
METHODS: A prospective non-randomised trial compared a structured prehabilitation exercise intervention during neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery versus conventional best-practice for oesophageal cancer patients. Biochemical and body composition analyses were performed at multiple time points. Outcome measures included radiological and pathological markers of disease regression. Logistic regression calculated ORs with 95% CI for the likelihood of pathological response adjusting for chemotherapy regimen and chemotherapy delivery.
RESULTS: Comparison of the Intervention (n=21) and Control (n=19) groups indicated the Intervention group had higher rates of tumour regression (Mandard TRG 1-3 Intervention n=15/20 (75%) vs Control n=7/19 (36.8%) p=0.025) including adjusted analyses (OR 6.57; 95% CI 1.52 to 28.30). Combined tumour and node downstaging (Intervention n=9 (42.9%) vs Control n=3 (15.8%) p=0.089) and Fat Free Mass index were also improved (Intervention 17.8 vs 18.7 kg/m2; Control 16.3 vs 14.7 kg/m2, p=0.026). Differences in markers of immunity (CD-3 and CD-8) and inflammation (IL-6, VEGF, INF-y, TNFa, MCP-1 and EGF) were observed.
CONCLUSION: The results suggest improved tumour regression and downstaging in the exercise intervention group and should prompt larger studies on this topic. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03626610. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  physical activity; prospective studies; rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35105604     DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2021-104243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  4 in total

1.  Usefulness of Procalcitonin as a Predictor of Long-Term Prognosis in the Early Postoperative Period after Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Eisuke Booka; Hirotoshi Kikuchi; Ryoma Haneda; Wataru Soneda; Sanshiro Kawata; Tomohiro Murakami; Tomohiro Matsumoto; Yoshihiro Hiramatsu; Hiroya Takeuchi
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Feasibility and Impact of Adapted Physical Activity (APA) in Cancer Outpatients Beginning Medical Anti-Tumoral Treatment: The UMA-CHAPA Study.

Authors:  Amélie Lemoine; Marine Perrier; Camille Mazza; Anne Quinquenel; Mathilde Brasseur; Alain Delmer; Hervé Vallerand; Maxime Dewolf; Eric Bertin; Coralie Barbe; Damien Botsen; Olivier Bouché
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Exercise as cancer treatment: A clinical oncology framework for exercise oncology research.

Authors:  Kerry S Courneya; Christopher M Booth
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Physical exercise during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer as a mean to increase pathological complete response rates: Trial protocol of the randomized Neo-ACT trial.

Authors:  Jana de Boniface; Renske Altena; Cecilia Haddad Ringborg; Kate A Bolam; Yvonne Wengström
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 3.752

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.