Literature DB >> 35104692

Design thinking to improve healthcare delivery in the intensive care unit: Promise, pitfalls, and lessons learned.

Kristyn A Krolikowski1, Mengxue Bi2, Christopher M Baggott2, Rebeca Khorzad3, Jane L Holl4, Jacqueline M Kruser5.   

Abstract

Design thinking is a problem-solving approach characterized by the empathetic lens through which designers integrate perspectives of end-users and key stakeholders throughout the entire process of developing solutions. This approach is rooted in diverse fields including engineering, computer science, psychology, and business and is increasingly widespread in healthcare. Herein, we describe the promise of design thinking to help solve intractable problems in healthcare delivery, including those within the complex social and technical intensive care unit system. We highlight our team's experience using design thinking to address the complex problem of aligning the delivery of life-sustaining treatments with patients' individual goals, values, and preferences. However, given the high stakes of design failure in healthcare, we also discuss the limitations of this approach and the potential consequences of inadequate application. Finally, we suggest a pathway forward that combines the philosophy and tools of design thinking with existing methods within healthcare delivery science, such as qualitative research, quality improvement methods, and implementation science. Ultimately, we argue that design thinking is a valuable approach to guide designers, clinicians, researchers, and administrators towards a more genuine understanding of the healthcare experience, through the lens of patients, their families, and frontline clinicians.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision making; Design thinking; Intensive care; Qualitative research; Stakeholder engagement

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35104692      PMCID: PMC9064881          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2022.153999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Crit Care        ISSN: 0883-9441            Impact factor:   4.298


  7 in total

1.  Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Curran; Mark Bauer; Brian Mittman; Jeffrey M Pyne; Cheryl Stetler
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Evaluation of an integrated graphical display to promote acute change detection in ICU patients.

Authors:  Shilo Anders; Robert Albert; Anne Miller; Matthew B Weinger; Alexa K Doig; Michael Behrens; Jim Agutter
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 4.046

3.  User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation.

Authors:  Aaron R Lyon; Kelly Koerner
Journal:  Clin Psychol (New York)       Date:  2016-06-17

Review 4.  Human-centred design in global health: A scoping review of applications and contexts.

Authors:  Alessandra N Bazzano; Jane Martin; Elaine Hicks; Maille Faughnan; Laura Murphy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Design Thinking in Health Care.

Authors:  Myra Altman; Terry T K Huang; Jessica Y Breland
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 2.830

Review 6.  Human-Centered Design Lessons for Implementation Science: Improving the Implementation of a Patient-Centered Care Intervention.

Authors:  Laura K Beres; Sandra Simbeza; Charles B Holmes; Chanda Mwamba; Njekwa Mukamba; Anjali Sharma; Virginia Munamunungu; Monica Mwachande; Kombatende Sikombe; Carolyn Bolton Moore; Aaloke Mody; Aybüke Koyuncu; Katerina Christopoulos; Lazarus Jere; Jake Pry; Peter D Ehrenkranz; Ashwin Budden; Elvin Geng; Izukanji Sikazwe
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.731

7.  From tokenism to empowerment: progressing patient and public involvement in healthcare improvement.

Authors:  Josephine Ocloo; Rachel Matthews
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 7.035

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.