Literature DB >> 3510445

Threatened abortion: sonographic distinction of normal and abnormal gestation sacs.

D A Nyberg, F C Laing, R A Filly.   

Abstract

In an attempt to determine whether sonographic evaluation alone can distinguish normal from abnormal gestation sacs, a retrospective analysis was performed of ultrasound (US) scans from 168 women with threatened abortion. Gestation sacs were judged to be abnormal on the basis of specific sonographic criteria including large size (greater than or equal to 25 mm mean sac diameter) without an embryo; distorted shape; thin (less than or equal to 2 mm), weakly echogenic, or irregular choriodecidual reaction; absence of a double decidual sac; and low position. Two criteria - large sac and distorted shape - had 100% specificity and were called major criteria. The remaining criteria were individually less specific, although 100% specificity was achieved when three or more of these minor criteria were demonstrated. When one major or three minor criteria were present, 53% of abnormal gestations were correctly identified without any false-positive diagnoses. The authors conclude that experienced sonographers can reliably identify many abnormal gestation sacs on a single examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3510445     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.158.2.3510445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  6 in total

1.  Value and Limitations of Obstetrical Ultrasound: Uncovering abnormalities at earlier stages.

Authors:  P J Switzer; C A James; M A Frettag
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Re-examining Sonographic Cut-off Values for Diagnosing Early Pregnancy Loss.

Authors:  Jennifer Bickhaus; Erin Perry; Danny J Schust
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet (Sunnyvale)       Date:  2013

3.  The screening of embryonic viability in early asymptomatic pregnancy by a single endosonographic scan associated with plasma human chorionic gonadotropin determination.

Authors:  S Guerriero; V Mais; S Ajossa; A M Paoletti; A Risalvato; G B Melis
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Transvaginal ultrasonography in first trimester of pregnancy and its comparison with transabdominal ultrasonography.

Authors:  Aneet Kaur; Amarjit Kaur
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2011-07

Review 5.  Rationalising the change in defining non-viability in the first trimester.

Authors:  Fernando Infante; Ishwari Casikar; Uche Menakaya; George Condous
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31

6.  Imaging for acute pelvic pain in pregnancy.

Authors:  Gabriele Masselli; Roberto Brunelli; Riccardo Monti; Marianna Guida; Francesca Laghi; Emanuele Casciani; Elisabetta Polettini; Gianfranco Gualdi
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2014-02-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.