Toshiyuki Mori1, Hideki Endo2, Takeyuki Misawa3, Shigeki Yamaguchi4, Yoshihiro Sakamoto5, Masafumi Inomata6, Yoshiharu Sakai7, Yoshihiro Kakeji8, Hiroaki Miyata9, Yuko Kitagawa10, Masahiko Watanabe11. 1. Department of Surgery, Kyorin University School of Medicine, 6-20-2 Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo, Tokyo, 181-8611, Japan. mori@ks.kyorin-u.ac.jp. 2. Department of Healthcare Quality Assessment, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. 3. Department of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. 4. Department of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan. 5. Department of Surgery, Kyorin University School of Medicine, 6-20-2 Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo, Tokyo, 181-8611, Japan. 6. Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University of Faculty of Medicine, Yufu, Oita, Japan. 7. Department of Surgery, Red Cross Hospital Osaka, Osaka, Japan. 8. Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan. 9. Department of Health Policy and Management, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan. 10. Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. 11. Kitasato University, Kitasato Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (ESSQS) was developed by the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery as a means of subjectively assessing the proficiency of laparoscopic surgeons. We conducted a study to evaluate how involvement of an ESSQS skill-qualified (SQ) surgeon influences short-term outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed for acute cholecystitis. Previous reports suggest that assessment of the video-rating system is a potential tool to discriminate laparoscopic surgeons' proficiency and top-rated surgeons face less surgical mortality and morbidity in bariatric surgery. METHODS: Data from the National Clinical Database regarding laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed for acute cholecystitis between January 2016 and December 2018 were analyzed. Outcomes were compared between patients grouped according to involvement vs. non-involvement of an SQ surgeon. Outcomes were also compared between patients grouped according to whether their operation was performed by biliary tract-, stomach-, or colon-qualified surgeon. RESULTS: Of the 309,998 laparoscopic cholecystectomies during the study period, 65,295 were suitable for inclusion in the study and 13,670 (20.9%) were performed by an SQ surgeon. Patients' clinical characteristics did not differ between groups. Thirty-day mortality was significantly lower in the SQ group (0.1%) 16/13,670 than in the non-SQ group (0.2%) 140/51,625 (P = 0.001). Thirty-day mortality was [0.1% (9/7173)] in the biliary tract-qualified group, [0.2% (5/3527)] in the stomach-qualified group, and [0.1% (2/3240)] in the colon-qualified group. CONCLUSION: Surgeons with ESSQS certification outperform the non-skilled surgeons in terms of surgical mortality in 30 and 90 days. Further verification of the value of the ESSQS is warranted and similar systems may be needed in countries across the world to ensure patient safety and control the quality of surgical treatments.
OBJECTIVE: The Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (ESSQS) was developed by the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery as a means of subjectively assessing the proficiency of laparoscopic surgeons. We conducted a study to evaluate how involvement of an ESSQS skill-qualified (SQ) surgeon influences short-term outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed for acute cholecystitis. Previous reports suggest that assessment of the video-rating system is a potential tool to discriminate laparoscopic surgeons' proficiency and top-rated surgeons face less surgical mortality and morbidity in bariatric surgery. METHODS: Data from the National Clinical Database regarding laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed for acute cholecystitis between January 2016 and December 2018 were analyzed. Outcomes were compared between patients grouped according to involvement vs. non-involvement of an SQ surgeon. Outcomes were also compared between patients grouped according to whether their operation was performed by biliary tract-, stomach-, or colon-qualified surgeon. RESULTS: Of the 309,998 laparoscopic cholecystectomies during the study period, 65,295 were suitable for inclusion in the study and 13,670 (20.9%) were performed by an SQ surgeon. Patients' clinical characteristics did not differ between groups. Thirty-day mortality was significantly lower in the SQ group (0.1%) 16/13,670 than in the non-SQ group (0.2%) 140/51,625 (P = 0.001). Thirty-day mortality was [0.1% (9/7173)] in the biliary tract-qualified group, [0.2% (5/3527)] in the stomach-qualified group, and [0.1% (2/3240)] in the colon-qualified group. CONCLUSION: Surgeons with ESSQS certification outperform the non-skilled surgeons in terms of surgical mortality in 30 and 90 days. Further verification of the value of the ESSQS is warranted and similar systems may be needed in countries across the world to ensure patient safety and control the quality of surgical treatments.
Authors: Rafael Alvarez; Aaron J Bonham; Colleen M Buda; Arthur M Carlin; Amir A Ghaferi; Oliver A Varban Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Lucia Ilaria Sgaramella; Angela Gurrado; Alessandro Pasculli; Nicola de Angelis; Riccardo Memeo; Francesco Paolo Prete; Stefano Berti; Graziano Ceccarelli; Marco Rigamonti; Francesco Giuseppe Aldo Badessi; Nicola Solari; Marco Milone; Fausto Catena; Stefano Scabini; Francesco Vittore; Gennaro Perrone; Carlo de Werra; Ferdinando Cafiero; Mario Testini Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2020-08-11 Impact factor: 4.584