| Literature DB >> 35103558 |
Jin Mei Zhang1,2, Mei Rong Zhang3, Chun Hong Yang4, Yumei Li1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This qualitative study explores the meaning of life and end-of-life coping strategies among patients in China with advanced lung cancer.Entities:
Keywords: Advanced lung cancer; meaning of life; qualitative research; terminal care
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35103558 PMCID: PMC8925916 DOI: 10.1080/17482631.2022.2028348
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being ISSN: 1748-2623
Participant characteristics (N = 21)
| Characteristics | ||
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 58.51 ± 8.73; 32–73 | |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 16 | |
| Female | 5 | |
| Marital status | ||
| Single | 2 | |
| Married | 16 | |
| Divorced | 2 | |
| Widowed | 1 | |
| Religion | ||
| Christian Church | 3 | |
| Taoism | 1 | |
| Buddhism | 2 | |
| None | 15 | |
| Educational level | ||
| Primary | 1 | |
| Junior high | 8 | |
| Senior high | 4 | |
| University | 3 | |
| Other | 5 | |
| Duration of disease | ||
| ≤6 Months | 6 | |
| 6–12 Months | 5 | |
| ≥12 Months | 10 | |
M = Mean; SD = Standard deviation.
Interview guide
| Number | Interview guide | Interview time |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | How has your attitude towards life changed since your diagnosis? | 30–40 min/time |
| 2 | What impact have past suffering and setbacks had on you? | |
| 3 | What do you think is most important to you or your top priority? | |
| 4 | If you could have your life over again, how would you live it? | |
| 5 | How do you understand MoL? | |
| 6 | In retrospect, if there was one thing that could do to improve the meaning of your life, what would it be? | |
| 7 | What do you want to do about the future? What are your goals? | |
| 8 | What do you think of death? |
Colaizzi phenomenological analysis of seven steps and description
| Steps | Description |
|---|---|
| 1. Familiarization | Through repeated and careful reading of the collected data, the researcher became fully familiar with and understood all the information provided by the participants. |
| 2. Identifying significant statements | We extracted meaningful statements that are consistent with the phenomena studied; |
| 3. Formulating meanings | Researchers construct/encode the meanings of recurring ideas, bracket our own existing phenomenon-related presumptions as possible. |
| 4. Clustering themes | Searching for common concepts to form themes, subject groups, and categories. At this point, you still need to “bracket” our existing ideas or experience, especially theoretical knowledge from the literature. |
| 5. Developing an exhaustive description | The researcher should provide a detailed description of each topic generated in step 4 and may extract and add references original statement from the participants. |
| 6. Producing the fundamental structure | Repeat comparisons of similar themes and their descriptions to identify and extract similar perspectives; Then construct a short and intensive phrase, the subject. |
| 7. Seeking verification of the fundamental structure | The resulting topic structure is returned to the study participants for verification, asking whether their real experience has been captured to ensure the accuracy of the results. If there is a deviation, the researcher must start the analysis step by step from the first step. |
Figure 1.Connotation composition of meaning of life in patients with advanced lung cancer.