| Literature DB >> 35103091 |
Abstract
AIMS: The aim of this retrospective infodemiological study is to investigate the public interest to the bakery products in the early period of coronavirus outbreak through Google Trends and open access data banks.Entities:
Keywords: Bakery products; Coronavirus; Food choice; Google trends; Impact health
Year: 2021 PMID: 35103091 PMCID: PMC8792530 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgfs.2021.100359
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Gastron Food Sci ISSN: 1878-450X
According to data normalization in the last 10 years', the amounts of percentage change in keywords’ monthly RSV scores between February - August 2020, corresponding to previous year.
| February | March | April | May | June | July | August | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ↑ (2%) | ↑ (36.7%) | ↑ (208.3%) | ↑ (77.7%) | ↓ (3.1%) | ↓ (20.5%) | ↓ (19.4%) | ||
| ↑ (3.7%) | ↑ (203.8%) | ↑ (376.2%) | ↑ (155%) | ↑ (92.9%) | ↑ (21.4%) | ↑ (5.9%) | ||
| – | ↑ (23.5%) | ↑ (33.3%) | ↑ (35.4%) | ↓ (3.8%) | ↑ (51%) | – | ||
| ↓(20%) | ↑ (230.7%) | ↑ (1011.1) | ↑ (209.1%) | ↑ (70%) | ↑ (18.2) | – | ||
| – | ↑ (700%) | ↑ (900%) | ↑ (375%) | ↑ (220%) | ↑ (80%) | ↑ (33.3%) | ||
| ↑ (20%) | ↑ (148.7%) | ↑ (170.3%) | ↑ (86.1%) | ↑ (95.7%) | ↑ (70.6%) | ↑ (18.8%) | ||
| ↓ (13.5%) | ↑ (41.7%) | ↑ (185.7%) | ↑ (123.3%) | ↑ (32%) | ↓ (22.9%) | ↓ (9.7%) | ||
| ↓ (15.8%) | ↑ (383.3%) | ↑ (614.3%) | ↑ (275%) | ↑ (125%) | ↑ (57.1%) | ↑ (10%) | ||
| ↓ (2%) | ↑ (27.8%) | ↑ (88.5%) | ↑ (100%) | ↑ (10.6%) | ↑ (59.6%) | ↓ (10%) | ||
| – | ↑ (188.9%) | ↑ (488.2%) | ↑ (95%) | ↑ (18.8%) | ↑ (12.5%) | ↑ (5.8%) | ||
| – | ↑ (388.2%) | ↑ (488.2%) | ↑ (193.3%) | ↑ (75%) | ↑ (25%) | – | ||
| ↑ (17.1%) | ↑ (52.3%) | ↑ (66.7%) | ↑ (86.8%) | ↑ (23.6%) | ↑ (43.5%) | ↑ (22.4%) | ||
| – | ↓(14.8%) | ↑ (75.4%) | ↑ (148.3%) | ↑ (11.8%) | ↓(36.8%) | ↓ (35.4%) | ||
| ↑ (72.4%) | ↓ (13.6%) | ↓ (33.3%) | ↓ (31.3%) | ↓ (16.1%) | ↑ (78.9%) | ↓ (39.1%) | ||
| ↑ (8.4%) | ↑ (36.2%) | ↑ (12.9%) | ↑ (30.2%) | ↑ (14.3%) | ↑ (38.2%) | ↑ (34.8%) | ||
| ↓ (7.7%) | ↑ (29.2%) | ↑ (138.1%) | ↑ (68.2%) | ↑ (38.9%) | ↑ (38.9%) | ↑ (40%) | ||
| ↑ (7.7%) | ↑ (92.1%) | ↑ (156.1%) | ↑ (78.7%) | ↑ (14.3%) | ↑ (21.3%) | ↑ (14.3%) | ||
| ↑ (39.7%) | ↓ (3.6%) | ↓ (25.3%) | ↑ (25.4%) | ↑ (13.1%) | ↓(7.8%) | ↑ (5%) | ||
| ↓ (4.3%) | ↑ (23.4%) | ↑ (78.6%) | ↑ (82.1%) | ↑ (28.3%) | ↓ (10.3%) | ↑ (10.6%) | ||
| ↓ (2.2%) | ↑ (135.7%) | ↑ (156.4%) | ↑ (83.3%) | ↑ (62.5%) | ↑ (27.3%) | ↑ (7.4%) | ||
| ↑ (1.4%) | ↑ (34.8%) | ↑ (31.6%) | ↑ (30.7%) | ↑ (26.7%) | ↑ (15.4%) | ↑ (19.4%) | ||
| – | ↑ (74.5%) | ↑ (125%) | ↑ (61.3%) | ↑ (21.3%) | ↑ (28.3%) | ↑ (31.3%) | ||
| ↑ (2.2%) | ↑ (79.5%) | ↑ (122.2%) | ↑ (57.1%) | ↑ (29.7%) | ↑ (10.5%) | ↑ (7.3%) | ||
| ↑ (14%) | ↑ (24.4%) | ↑ (45.3%) | ↑ (37.3%) | ↑ (18.3%) | ↑ (32.4%) | ↑ (24%) | ||
| ↓(1.2%) | ↑ (23.6%) | ↑ (92.3%) | ↑ (93.6%) | ↑ (6.8%) | ↑ (18.5%) | ↓ (3.1%) | ||
| ↓(10.8%) | ↑ (175.8%) | ↑ (203%) | ↑ (106.9%) | ↑ (29.7%) | ↑ (10.7%) | ↑ (15.2%) | ||
| ↑ (9.2%) | ↓ (9.8%) | ↑ (10.8%) | ↑ (14.7%) | ↑ (8.2%) | ↑ (11.1%) | ↑ (13%) | ||
| ↑ (4.8%) | ↑ (3.8%) | ↑ (31.3%) | ↑ (47.6%) | ↑ (20.6%) | ↓ (1.5%) | ↑ (13.6%) | ||
| ↑ (2.9%) | ↑ (62%) | ↑ (150%) | ↑ (71.7%) | ↑ (14.8%) | ↑ (6.1%) | ↑ (2.1%) | ||
| ↑ (4.8%) | ↑ (3.1%) | ↑ (38.6%) | ↑ (31.6%) | ↑ (1.4%) | ↑ (1.5%) | ↑ (18.8%) | ||
| ↑ (9.8%) | ↑ (4.4%) | ↑ (69%) | ↑ (19%) | ↑ (15.2%) | – | ↑ (1%) | ||
| ↑ (7.3%) | ↑ (35.9%) | ↑ (75.4%) | ↑ (31%) | ↑ (26.4%) | ↑ (7.4%) | ↑ (3.7%) | ||
| ↑ (30.6%) | ↓ (9.7%) | ↑ (1.4%) | ↑ (131.6%) | ↑ (61.4%) | ↓ (21.1%) | ↑ (18.8%) | ||
| ↑ (6.3%) | ↓ (30%) | ↓ (31.6%) | ↓ (41.1%) | ↓ (13.8%) | ↓ (1.4%) | ↑ (5.1%) | ||
| ↑ (6%) | ↓ (29.6%) | ↓(5.3%) | ↑ (8.3%) | ↑ (18.9%) | ↑ (10.8%) | ↑ (4.9%) | ||
| ↑ (2.6%) | ↑ (9.3%) | ↑ (20.8%) | ↑ (13%) | ↑ (12%) | ↑ (7.5%) | ↑ (4.7%) | ||
| ↑ (3.8%) | ↑ (2%) | ↑ (42%) | ↓(18%) | ↑ (3.9%) | ↑ (30%) | ↑ (8.5%) | ||
| ↑ (7.8%) | ↑ (18.8%) | ↑ (56.3%) | ↑ (25.5%) | ↑ (24.5%) | ↑ (7.7%) | ↑ (3.2%) | ||
| ↓ (6.6%) | ↓ (3%) | ↑ (11%) | ↑ (17.5%) | ↑ (17.4%) | ↑ (12.5%) | ↓ (4.6%) | ||
Fig. 1As the data normalization in multiple search option , the comparison of the RSV scores of “fruit”, “vegetable”, “fish”, “meat” and “bread” in the Turkey (A1-A5), Italy (B1–B5) and Sweden (C1–C5). Stay at home requirements are available in top of the Fig. as coloured scale and the meaning of the colour in the scale is given in bottom of the Fig. The dashed red line shows the first confirmed case of coronavirus; dark black trend indicates 2020 data; the gray trendsshowdata from previous years. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Fig. 2aAs the data normalization in multiple search option, the comparison of the RSV scores of “flour”, “yeast”, “dough” and “fish” in the Turkey (A1-A4), Italy (B1–B4) and Sweden (C1–C4). Stay at home requirements are available in top of the Fig. as coloured scale and the meaning of the colour in the scale is given in bottom of the Fig. The dashed red line shows the first confirmed case of coronavirus; dark black trend indicates 2020 data; the gray trendsshowdata from previous years. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Fig. 2bAs the data normalization in multiple search option, the comparison of the RSV scores of “bread”, “cake”, “pasta”, “pizza” and “fish” in the Turkey (A1-A5), Italy (B1–B5) and Sweden (C1–C5). Stay at home requirements are available in top of the Fig. as coloured scale and the meaning of the colour in the scale is given in bottom of the Fig.The dashed red line shows the first confirmed case of coronavirus; dark black trend indicates 2020 data; the gray trendsshowdata from previous years. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
The Spearman's rho correlation analysis between stringency index, daily new case number of coronavirus and RSV of coronavirus with daily RSV scores of foods between the 1 February-1 September 2020 in Turkey (TR), Italy (IT) and Sweden (SE). Data represents as Spearman's rho correlation coefficients (rs) and p values.
| Stringency Index | Daily New Case Number | RSV of Coronavirus | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs | p | rs | p | rs | p | |||
| .41** | .00 | .017 | .80 | .10 | .15 | |||
| -.03 | .70 | .00 | .98 | .05 | .44 | |||
| .15* | .03 | .224** | .00 | |||||
| .14* | .04 | .13 | .06 | .32** | .00 | |||
| .21** | .00 | .20** | .00 | |||||
| .44** | .31** | .00 | .32** | .00 | ||||
| .14* | .04 | .24** | .00 | |||||
| .17* | .02 | .14* | .04 | .25** | .00 | |||
| .26** | .00 | .06 | .36 | .13 | .07 | |||
| -.07 | .29 | -.20** | .01 | -.05 | .44 | |||
| .02 | .80 | .01 | .88 | .01 | .90 | |||
| .49** | .00 | .15* | .03 | .20** | .00 | |||
| .43** | .00 | .47** | .00 | .32** | .00 | |||
| -.02 | .80 | -.02 | .80 | .04 | .52 | |||
| .46** | .00 | -.02 | .81 | .16* | .02 | |||
| .10 | .17 | .08 | .25 | .06 | .38 | |||
| .32** | .00 | .34** | .00 | |||||
| -.15* | .03 | -.28** | .00 | .08 | .22 | |||
| .35** | .00 | .19** | .01 | |||||
| .16* | .02 | .27** | .00 | .02 | .77 | |||
| .17* | .02 | -.09 | .17 | -.10 | .17 | |||
| .43** | .00 | |||||||
| 0.32 | .64 | .07 | .29 | -.01 | .84 | |||
| .30** | .00 | -.02 | .83 | -.04 | .56 | |||
| .54** | .00 | .49** | .00 | .30** | .00 | |||
| .01 | .84 | -.05 | .48 | .01 | .84 | |||
| -.60** | .00 | .02 | .74 | -.10 | .13 | |||
| -.40** | .00 | -.23** | .00 | -.43** | .00 | |||
| .01 | .89 | .01 | .87 | .01 | .88 | |||
| .33** | .00 | .57** | .00 | .12 | .08 | |||
| .35** | .00 | .40** | .00 | .33** | .00 | |||
| 0.05 | .35 | .16* | .02 | -.01 | .90 | |||
: rs: 0.40–0.59 indicates to moderately correlation; rs: 0.60–0.79 indicates to highly correlation; rs: 0.79–0.99 indicates to very highly correlation. *Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level. **Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level.
Related top queries of keywords in the Turkey, Italy and Sweden.
| Related Top Queries | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Flour halva, flour cookie, flour halva recipe, flour cookie recipe | |||
| Rice flour, pizza flour, flour, wholemeal flour | |||
| Gluten free, gluten free flour, flour grams dl | |||
| Sour yeast, dry yeast, instant yeast, fresh yeast | |||
| Mother yeast, without yeast, brewer's yeast | |||
| Bread yeast, bread, pizza dough, pizza dough yeast | |||
| Pastries, recipes, fried dough | |||
| Pizza dough, bread dough | |||
| Pizza dough, pizza recipe, piroger (local food), piroger dough | |||
| Bread recipe, bread making, meat bread | |||
| Bread recipe, bread in houses, homemade bread, whole grain bread | |||
| Bread recipe, bake bread, gluten free bread | |||
| Dough recipe, pastry recipe, easy pastry | |||
| No data | |||
| Pastry recipe, pastries and coffee breaks, easy pastry, bake | |||
| Biscuit recipe, biscuit cake | |||
| Ice cream biscuit, cookie dough, biscuit cake, biscuit | |||
| Biscuit recipe, chocolate biscuits, biscuits for cheese, cheese and crackers | |||
| Cake recipe, wet cake recipe | |||
| Apple pie/cake, chocolate pie/cake, pie/cake recipe | |||
| Cake recipe, cake bake, soft cookie, cake frying pan | |||
| Pasta recipe, baked pasta, pasta with sauce | |||
| Pasta recipe, puff pastry, shortcrust pastry, zucchini pastry | |||
| Pasta with, pasta carbonara (local food), pasta recipe, chicken pasta | |||
| Domino's pizza, pizza recipe, pizza dough, pizza hut | |||
| Pizza, pizzeria, pizza dough, pizza recipe | |||
| Pizza hut, pizza online, pizza recipe | |||
Fig. 3Population-related and external factors that influence bakery product choices in the quarantine period of the era of COVID-19 and their potential impacts on the health in the future.