| Literature DB >> 35103072 |
Shengnan Li1,2, Cong Zheng1, Lixiang Li3.
Abstract
Due to the increasing prosperity of human life science and technology, many huge research results have been obtained, and the scientific research of molecular biology is developing rapidly. Therefore, the output of biological genome data has increased exponentially, which constitutes a huge amount of data analysis. The seemingly chaotic and massive amount of data information actually contains a large amount of data and information of great key scientific significance and value. Therefore, this kind of genomic data information not only contains the information content that describes the characteristics of human life but also contains the information content that can express the essence of the biological organism. It includes macroeconomic information that can reflect the basic structure and capabilities of living organisms and microinformation in related fields of molecular biology. This massive amount of genetic data is usually closely related to each other, can influence each other, and does not exist alone. In the article, the causes of uncertain data and the classification of uncertain data are introduced, and the basic concepts and related algorithms of data mining are explained. Focusing on the research and analysis of abnormal point detection and clustering algorithms in uncertain data mining technology, this paper solves the problem of how to obtain more diverse and accurate outlier detection and cluster analysis results in uncertain data. The results showed that whether it was related to obesity or not, the Lp(a) level of the sarcopenia group was significantly higher than that of the nonsarcopenia group. At the same time, the correlation analysis showed that ASM/height was negatively correlated with Lp(a). ASM/height is one of the criteria for diagnosing sarcoidosis, and it is also the core of the analysis. Among the 1956 tumor patients collected in this study, 432 had sarcopenia, accounting for 22.08%, and the incidence of sarcopenia in patients with gastrointestinal tumors increased.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35103072 PMCID: PMC8800625 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9339905
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Math Methods Med ISSN: 1748-670X Impact factor: 2.238
Figure 1Diagnosis of sarcopenia.
Figure 2Principles of sarcopenia.
Figure 3Relationship between tumor and sarcopenia.
Figure 4Principles of data mining.
Comparison of general information and anthropometric indicators of patients with different types of tumors.
| Lung cancer | Stomach cancer | Colorectal cancer | Breast cancer | Liver cancer | Pancreatic cancer | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | |||||||
| (M/F) | 677/398 | 83/46 | 221/174 | 0/189 | 99/52 | 10/7 | 1090/866 |
| Age | 58.45 ± 9.40 | 56.09 ± 10.48 | 58.67 ± 10.69 | 52.30 ± 10.08 | 57.34 ± 9.88 | 61.10 ± 10.28 | 57.20 ± 10.14 |
| ASMI | 7.11 | 6.90 ± 1.2 | 6.94 ± 1.20 | 6.48 ± 0.9 | 7.16 ± 1.0 | 6.55 ± 1 | 6.73 (1.34) |
| (kg/m2) | (1.51) | 0 | 6 | 0 | 01 | ||
| HS (kg) | 26 (13.25) | 24.25 ± 10.10 | 23.83 ± 9.7 | 19.76 ± 6.18 | 26.87 ± 10.28 | 23.29 ± 8 .21 | 24.3 (12.73) |
| BMI | 23.14 ± 3.3 | 20.95 ± 3 | 23.22 ± 3.3 | 24.82 ± 3 | 23.36 ± 2 | 17.81 ± 2 | 23.11 ± 3.53 |
| kg/m2 | 9 | 14 | 9 | 72 | 86 | 51 |
Figure 5Changes in various indicators at different ages.
Comparison of the incidence of sarcopenia in patients with different tumors.
| Tumor type | Sarcopenia | Nonsarcopenia | Incidence | ×2 |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lung cancer | Yes | 208 | 867 | 19.35% | 10.39 | <0.001 |
| No | 224 | 657 | 25.43% | |||
| Stomach cancer | Yes | 50 | 79 | 38.80% | 22.313 | <0.001 |
| No | 382 | 1445 | 20.90% | |||
| Bowel cancer | Yes | 118 | 177 | 29.87% | 31.992 | <0.001 |
| No | 314 | 1247 | 20.12% | |||
| Breast cancer | Yes | 31 | 158 | 5.50% | 3.928 | 0.047 |
| No | 401 | 1366 | 22.70% | |||
| Liver cancer | Yes | 18 | 133 | 11.90% | 9.826 | 0.001 |
| No | 414 | 1391 | 22.00% | |||
| Pancreatic cancer | Yes | 7 | 10 | 41.20% | 3.632 | 0.074 |
| No | 425 | 1514 | 21.90% |
Figure 6Probability of cancer patients and nontumor patients.
Comparison of general data and metabolic indexes between sarcopenia group and nonsarcopenia group.
| Variable | Sarcopenia | Non sarcopenia |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 232 (200) | 858 (666) | 0.919 | 0.338 |
| Age | 62.61 ± 10.18 | 56.20 ± 9.88 | -10.183 | <0.001 |
| BMI | 19.91 ± 2.58 | 23.59 ± 3.41 | 17.431 | <0.001 |
| Total protein | 57.40 (37.63) | 54.10 (40.30) | -1.340∗ | 0.180 |
| Albumin | 31.70 (49.50) | 30.95 (52.50) | -0.679∗ | 0.497 |
| Fasting blood glucose | 5.64 (28.80) | 5.56 (30.51) | -0.564∗ | 0.573 |
| Cholesterol | 3.45 (4.17) | 3.46 (3.99) | -0.146∗ | 0.884 |
| Triglycerides | 1.63 (3.66) | 2.35 (3.69) | -2.710∗ | 0.007 |
Figure 7Comparison of various indicators of sarcopenia and nonsarcoidosis.
Subject information.
| Sarcopenia (+) | No obesity |
| Sarcopenia (+) | Obesity |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sarcopenia (-) | Sarcopenia (-) | |||||
| Number of people | 72 | 248 | 53 | 154 | ||
| Men/women | 2347 | 81167 | 18/38 | 6292 | ||
| Age | 73.93 ± 8.19 | 70.18 ± 7.41 | 77.95 ± 9.28 | 71.12 ± 7.87 | ||
| Smoking rate (%) | 36.20% | 17.14% | 57.18% | 20.13% | ||
| Drinking rate (%) | 12.86% | 17.74% | 37.50% | 17.53% | ||
| Coronary heart disease (%) | 15.71% | 25.81% | 32.14% | 28.57% | ||
| High blood pressure (%) | 62.86% | 70.97% | 73.21% | 78.57% | ||
| Peripheral atherosclerosis (%) | 54.29% | 52.02% | 60.71% | 44.81% | ||
| Diabetes (%) | 37.14% | 66.94% | 44.64% | 69.48% | ||
| Lp(a) (g/L) | 311.93 ± 369.21 | 240.86 ± 231.20 | 0.048 | 311.11 ± 411.87 | 197.29 ± 224.97 | 0.006 |
Extremity muscle mass/height 2. Correlation study between body fat percentage and Lp(a).
| Correlation coefficient | LP(a) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Limb muscle massheight/2 | -0.121 | 0.005 | |
| Body fat percentage | 0.003 | 0.944 |
Logistic regression analysis of Lp(a), sarcopenia, and obesity.
| No adjustment mode | Sarcopenia | Adjustment mode |
| No adjustment mode |
| Obesity |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Adjustment mode | |||||||
| OR value | OR value | OR value | OR value | |||||
| LP(a) | 1.541 | 0.1 | 1.587 | 0.1 | 0.781 | 0.1 | 0.784 | 0.1 |
| (1.121-2.120) | 08 | (1.125-2.238) | 09 | (0.589-1.035) | 85 | (0.585-1.049) | 01 |
Figure 8Probability of disease in different populations.