Literature DB >> 3510281

High-dose intensification therapy with autologous bone marrow support for limited small-cell bronchogenic carcinoma.

G Spitzer, P Farha, M Valdivieso, K Dicke, A Zander, L Vellekoop, W K Murphy, H M Dhingra, T Umsawasdi, D Chiuten.   

Abstract

The efficacy and toxicity of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) was studied in 32 patients with untreated limited small-cell bronchogenic carcinoma (SCBC). Ten patients received three courses of induction therapy consisting of vincristine (VCR) (1.5 mg X 2), ifosfamide (5 g/m2), and Adriamycin (Ad; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio) (60 mg/m2). Patients then received two courses of intensification therapy with cyclophosphamide (CYT) (4.5 g/m2), 4' demethyl-epipodophyllotoxin-d-D-ethylidene glucoside (VP-16-213) (600 mg/m2) and VCR (2 mg) with ABMT. Another 22 patients received induction therapy with VCR, CYT (600 mg/m2), Ad (50 mg/m2), and VP-16-213 (180 mg/m2). All 22 patients also received intensification therapy of the same dose of CYT (4.5 g/m2) and VP-16-213 (600 mg/m2). Nine patients also received high-dose methotrexate (MTX), four patients received Ad (40 to 60 mg/m2), and two patients received both Ad and MTX. After intensification, patients received elective prophylactic brain irradiation (3,000 rad) and chest irradiation (5,000 rad). After induction therapy, there were 13 (41%) complete remissions (CR) and 17 (53%) partial remissions (PR). After intensification therapy, there were 22 CRs (69%) and 10 PRs (31%). Median survival for all patients was 14 months (range, 5 to 59+). Of the 13 patients who received intensification therapy in CR, five remain disease free (DF), four for 4 years or longer. Of the nine patients to achieve CR with intensification, only one is DF. No patient died during intensification. In conclusion, intensification with high-dose chemotherapy can increase the CR rate, and this approach is most likely to show long-term benefits in patients with minimal disease (CR) at the beginning of intensification therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3510281     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1986.4.1.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  7 in total

Review 1.  Etoposide. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in combination chemotherapy of cancer.

Authors:  J M Henwood; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Intensive chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation for small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  R L Souhami; H T Hajichristou; D W Miles; H M Earl; P G Harper; C M Ash; A H Goldstone; S G Spiro; D M Geddes; J S Tobias
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 3.  Cancer chemotherapy: new strategies for success.

Authors:  N A Berger
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  A feasibility study of testing new drugs for small-cell lung cancer in patients with a poor performance status.

Authors:  P E Postmus; E F Smit; H H Berendsen; D T Sleyfer
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 5.  Design of preparative regimens for stem cell transplantation in breast cancer.

Authors:  G Spitzer; D Adkins; F Dunphy; P Petruska; V Spencer; W Velasquez
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 6.  Stem-cell transplantation for the treatment of advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  Yago Nieto; Roy B Jones; Elizabeth J Shpall
Journal:  Springer Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2004-09-11

7.  Circulating hematopoietic progenitors in patients with primary lung cancer.

Authors:  E Shimizu; J N Mukai; Y Takaue; T Ogura
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1990-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.