| Literature DB >> 35102491 |
Mads Kingo Guldberg Hansen1, Kristoffer Kjærgaard2, Lotte Lindgreen Eriksen2, Lea Ladegaard Grønkjær3, Anne Catrine Daugaard Mikkelsen2, Thomas Damgaard Sandahl2, Hendrik Vilstrup2, Karen Louise Thomsen2, Mette Munk Enok Lauridsen3.
Abstract
Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is cerebral dysfunction caused by liver failure and inflicts 30-40% of patients with liver cirrhosis during their disease course. Clinically manifest HE is often preceded by minimal HE (MHE) - a clinically undetectable cognitive disturbance closely associated with loss of quality of life. Accordingly, detecting and treating MHE improve the patients' daily functioning and prevent HE-related hospital admissions. The scope of this review article is to create an overview of the validation level and usage of psychometric tests used to detect MHE: Portosystemic hepatic encephalopathy test, continuous reaction time test, Stroop EncephalApp, animal naming test, critical flicker frequency test, and inhibitory control test. Our work is aimed at the clinician or scientist who is about to decide on which psychometric test would fit best in their clinic, cohort, or study. First, we outline psychometric test validation obstacles and requirements. Then, we systematically approach the literature on each test and select well-conducted studies to answer the following questions:• Which percentage of patients with cirrhosis does the test deem as having MHE?• Is the test able to predict clinically manifest HE?• Is there a well-known test-retest variation and inter-observer variation?• Is the test able to detect a treatment response?• Is the test result affected by age, educational level, gender, or comorbidities?Entities:
Keywords: Diagnostic tests; Hepatic encephalopathy; Liver cirrhosis; Psychometric tests; Test validation
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35102491 DOI: 10.1007/s11011-022-00913-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Metab Brain Dis ISSN: 0885-7490 Impact factor: 3.584