Veronika Yehezkeli1, Ivan Hare2,3, Elad Moisseiev2,4, Ehud I Assia2,4, Irit Chacham3, Noa Ela-Dalman2,4. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel. verobychkov@gmail.com. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel. 3. Optometric Clinic, Raanana, Israel. 4. Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Timely management of aphakic children is critical for the rehabilitation of adequate visual gain. This study aims to evaluate the long-term efficacy of scleral contact lenses in terms of visual outcomes, complications, and compliance in aphakic children. METHODS: Retrospective data review of children with congenital or acquired cataract, or subluxated crystalline lenses, who underwent lensectomy from 2004 to 2018 and who used scleral contact lenses for refractive correction. Collected data from the follow up period included recorded aphakic refraction and visual acuity, complications following scleral contact lens wear documented in the clinic and ophthalmic emergency room and compliance to lens wear according to parental feedback on every visit in the clinic. RESULTS: 76% of cases, with final best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/40 or better achieved in seventeen eyes (34%). The rate of amblyopia was 50%. Strabismus developed in 56% of children, and those had less favourable visual outcomes (0.43 ± 0.4 LogMAR without strabismus and 0.8 ± 0.5 LogMAR with strabismus, p = 0.015). No corneal infections were documented during the follow up. Main adverse effect on the ocular surface was superficial punctate keratopathy (n = 16). Compliance was good in 48 children (96%)- except for two cases, the scleral lenses were tolerated well by all children. CONCLUSION: Scleral contact lenses are an effective means of visual rehabilitation in aphakic children after lensectomy and may be used long-term with good compliance of wear, excellent visual outcomes, and tolerable adverse events.
BACKGROUND: Timely management of aphakic children is critical for the rehabilitation of adequate visual gain. This study aims to evaluate the long-term efficacy of scleral contact lenses in terms of visual outcomes, complications, and compliance in aphakic children. METHODS: Retrospective data review of children with congenital or acquired cataract, or subluxated crystalline lenses, who underwent lensectomy from 2004 to 2018 and who used scleral contact lenses for refractive correction. Collected data from the follow up period included recorded aphakic refraction and visual acuity, complications following scleral contact lens wear documented in the clinic and ophthalmic emergency room and compliance to lens wear according to parental feedback on every visit in the clinic. RESULTS: 76% of cases, with final best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/40 or better achieved in seventeen eyes (34%). The rate of amblyopia was 50%. Strabismus developed in 56% of children, and those had less favourable visual outcomes (0.43 ± 0.4 LogMAR without strabismus and 0.8 ± 0.5 LogMAR with strabismus, p = 0.015). No corneal infections were documented during the follow up. Main adverse effect on the ocular surface was superficial punctate keratopathy (n = 16). Compliance was good in 48 children (96%)- except for two cases, the scleral lenses were tolerated well by all children. CONCLUSION: Scleral contact lenses are an effective means of visual rehabilitation in aphakic children after lensectomy and may be used long-term with good compliance of wear, excellent visual outcomes, and tolerable adverse events.
Authors: M Edward Wilson; Rupal H Trivedi; Edward G Buckley; David B Granet; Scott R Lambert; David A Plager; Robert M Sinskey; Abhay R Vasavada Journal: J Cataract Refract Surg Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 3.351
Authors: Doğan Ceyhan; Bruce M Schnall; Anita Breckenridge; Joann Fontanarosa; Sharon S Lehman; Joseph C Calhoun Journal: J AAPOS Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 1.220
Authors: Scott R Lambert; Michael J Lynn; E Eugenie Hartmann; Lindreth DuBois; Carolyn Drews-Botsch; Sharon F Freedman; David A Plager; Edward G Buckley; M Edward Wilson Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: David A Plager; Michael J Lynn; Edward G Buckley; M Edward Wilson; Scott R Lambert Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2011-09-16 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Scott R Lambert; Michael J Lynn; Lindreth G DuBois; George A Cotsonis; E Eugenie Hartmann; M Edward Wilson Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-11-07 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Scott R Lambert; Michael Lynn; Carolyn Drews-Botsch; Lindreth DuBois; M Edward Wilson; David A Plager; David T Wheeler; Stephen P Christiansen; Earl R Crouch; Edward G Buckley; David Stager; Sean P Donahue Journal: J AAPOS Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 1.220