Kishan D Tsang1, Mendel K Ottow, Arno F J van Heijst, Timothy A J Antonius. 1. From the Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics (K.D.T., A.F.J.v.H., T.A.J.A.), and Department of Pediatrics (M.K.O.), Radboud University Medical Centre Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The Newborn Life Support (NLS) guideline aims to provide healthcare professionals a consistent approach during neonatal resuscitation. Adherence to this and analogous guidelines has repetitively been proven to be difficult.This study evaluates adherence to guideline using a novel augmented reality (Microsoft HoloLens) electronic decision support tool during standardized simulated neonatal resuscitation compared with subjects working from memory alone. METHODS: In this randomized controlled pilot study, 18 professionals responsible for neonatal resuscitation were randomized to the intervention group and 11 to the control group. Demographic characteristics were similar between both groups. A standardized neonatal resuscitation scenario was performed, which was recorded and later assessed for adherence to the NLS algorithm by 2 independent reviewers. Secondary outcomes were error classification in case of algorithm deviation and time to the execution or completion of critical steps in the algorithm to determine delay. RESULTS: Median (interquartile range) scores of a theoretical maximum of 40 in the intervention group were 34 (32.5-35.5) versus 29 (27-33) in the control group ( P = 0.004). Errors of commission were committed less frequently with the electronic decision support tool 2 (1-2.5) compared with 4 (2-4) in the control group ( P = 0.029). Analysis of time to initiation or completion of key steps in the NLS algorithm showed no significant differences between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare professionals using an electronic decision support tool showed improved adherence to the NLS guideline during simulated neonatal resuscitation.
INTRODUCTION: The Newborn Life Support (NLS) guideline aims to provide healthcare professionals a consistent approach during neonatal resuscitation. Adherence to this and analogous guidelines has repetitively been proven to be difficult.This study evaluates adherence to guideline using a novel augmented reality (Microsoft HoloLens) electronic decision support tool during standardized simulated neonatal resuscitation compared with subjects working from memory alone. METHODS: In this randomized controlled pilot study, 18 professionals responsible for neonatal resuscitation were randomized to the intervention group and 11 to the control group. Demographic characteristics were similar between both groups. A standardized neonatal resuscitation scenario was performed, which was recorded and later assessed for adherence to the NLS algorithm by 2 independent reviewers. Secondary outcomes were error classification in case of algorithm deviation and time to the execution or completion of critical steps in the algorithm to determine delay. RESULTS: Median (interquartile range) scores of a theoretical maximum of 40 in the intervention group were 34 (32.5-35.5) versus 29 (27-33) in the control group ( P = 0.004). Errors of commission were committed less frequently with the electronic decision support tool 2 (1-2.5) compared with 4 (2-4) in the control group ( P = 0.029). Analysis of time to initiation or completion of key steps in the NLS algorithm showed no significant differences between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare professionals using an electronic decision support tool showed improved adherence to the NLS guideline during simulated neonatal resuscitation.
Authors: Chih-Wei Yang; Zui-Shen Yen; Jane E McGowan; Huiju Carrie Chen; Wen-Chu Chiang; Mary E Mancini; Jasmeet Soar; Mei-Shu Lai; Matthew Huei-Ming Ma Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2012-03-03 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: John Kattwinkel; Jeffrey M Perlman; Khalid Aziz; Christopher Colby; Karen Fairchild; John Gallagher; Mary Fran Hazinski; Louis P Halamek; Praveen Kumar; George Little; Jane E McGowan; Barbara Nightengale; Mildred M Ramirez; Steven Ringer; Wendy M Simon; Gary M Weiner; Myra Wyckoff; Jeanette Zaichkin Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-11-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Catherine Lerner; Ana M Gaca; Donald P Frush; Sue Hohenhaus; Anjanette Ancarana; Terry A Seelinger; Karen Frush Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2009-05-13
Authors: Johan N Siebert; Frederic Ehrler; Alain Gervaix; Kevin Haddad; Laurence Lacroix; Philippe Schrurs; Ayhan Sahin; Christian Lovis; Sergio Manzano Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2017-05-29 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Mathijs Binkhorst; Irene van de Wiel; Jos M T Draaisma; Arno F J van Heijst; Tim Antonius; Marije Hogeveen Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 2020-05-29 Impact factor: 3.183