| Literature DB >> 35101057 |
Eden Dagnachew Zeleke1, Dawit Getachew Assefa2, Tigist Tekle Woldesenbet3, Rediet Gido4, Nebiyu Mengistu5, Wondwosen Molla4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Increasing access to family planning helps to ensure the reproductive right, decrease unintended pregnancy, improve the health and nutritional status of children, reduction of maternal mortality, and enhance longer birth spacing. However, there is continually low utilization of long acting and permanent contraceptive methods among low and middle-income countries. This study aimed to assess the utilization of long acting and permanent contraceptive methods (LAPMs) and associated factors among women of reproductive age in the West Guji Zone, Ethiopia.Entities:
Keywords: Contraception; Family planning; Long acting and permanent contraceptive methods; Utilization
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35101057 PMCID: PMC8805251 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-022-01337-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Health ISSN: 1742-4755 Impact factor: 3.223
Socio-demographic characteristics of respondent (N = 507)
| Variable | Frequency(number) | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Age of the women | ||
| 15–24 | 182 | 35.9 |
| 25–34 | 283 | 55.8 |
| 35–49 | 42 | 8.3 |
| Religion | ||
| Orthodox | 142 | 28 |
| Muslim | 66 | 13 |
| Protestant | 294 | 58 |
| Catholic | 5 | 1 |
| Educational level of women | ||
| Informal | 47 | 9.3 |
| Grade 1–8 | 131 | 25.8 |
| Grade 9–12 | 143 | 28.2 |
| College and university | 40 | 7.9 |
| Illiterate | 146 | 28.8 |
| Martial status | ||
| Married | 462 | 91.1 |
| Single | 24 | 4.7 |
| Divorced | 7 | 1.4 |
| Widowed | 8 | 1.6 |
| Separated | 6 | 1.2 |
| Occupation | ||
| Government employee | 189 | 37.3 |
| NGO employee | 2 | 0.4 |
| Private business (merchant) | 72 | 14.2 |
| Housewife | 162 | 32.0 |
| Student | 40 | 7.9 |
| Daily laborer | 32 | 6.3 |
| Farmer | 10 | 2 |
| Monthly income (ETB) | ||
| < 499 | 84 | 16.6 |
| 500–1499 | 192 | 37.9 |
| 1500–2499 | 111 | 21.9 |
| 2500–3499 | 84 | 16.6 |
| 3500–4499 | 14 | 2.8 |
| > 4500 | 22 | 4.3 |
ETB Ethiopian Birr
Obstetric characteristics of the respondents in west Guji zone (N = 507)
| Variables | Frequency(number) | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Age at time of marriage | ||
| 14–24 | 404 | 79.7 |
| 25–35 | 79 | 15.6 |
| Yet not married | 25 | 4.7 |
| Age at time of first birth | ||
| 14–24 | 374 | 73.8 |
| 25–35 | 81 | 16 |
| Yet not give birth | 52 | 10.3 |
| Gravidity (number of pregnancy) | ||
| 1 | 108 | 21.3 |
| 2–5 | 262 | 51.7 |
| 6 and above | 87 | 17.2 |
| No pregnancy | 50 | 9.9 |
| Parity (no of birth) | ||
| 1–2 | 160 | 31.6 |
| 3 and above | 295 | 58.2 |
| No children | 52 | 10.3 |
| Future desire of more babies | ||
| 1–2 | 33 | 6.5 |
| 3–4 | 152 | 30 |
| 5–6 | 125 | 24.7 |
| > 6 | 93 | 18.3 |
Utilization of long acting and permanent methods in west Guji zone (N = 507)
| LAPMs | Frequency | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Are you currently using LAPMs | ||
| Yes | 259 | 51.1 |
| Implant | 229 | 45.2 |
| IUCD | 25 | 4.9 |
| Tubal ligation | 5 | 1 |
| Vasectomy | 0 | 0 |
| No | 248 | 48.9 |
IUCD Intrauterine contraceptive device, LAPMS long acting and permanent contraceptive method
Knowledge of the respondent on long acting and permanent method in west Guji zone (N = 507)
| Do you know any modern family planning methods? | Frequency | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Yes | 337 | 66.5 |
| Pill as modern family planning | 197 | 38.9 |
| IUCD as modern family planning | 132 | 26 |
| Injectable as modern family planning | 323 | 63.7 |
| Tubal ligation as modern family planning | 58 | 11.4 |
| Vasectomy as modern family planning | 48 | 9.5 |
| Implant as modern family planning | 265 | 52.3 |
| Lactation as modern family planning | 52 | 10.3 |
| Condom as modern family planning | 133 | 26.2 |
| Do you know about LAPMs? | 280 | 55.2 |
| IUCD as long acting & permanent method | 126 | 24.9 |
| Implant as long acting and permanent method | 277 | 54.6 |
| Tubal ligation as long acting and permanent method | 59 | 11.6 |
| Vasectomy as long acting and permanent method | 45 | 8.9 |
IUCD - Intrauterine contraceptive device, LAPMS - long acting and permanent contraceptive method
Knowledge of the respondent on LAPMs in west Guji zone
| Yes | No | Don’t know | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Does IUCD can prevent pregnancies for more than 10 years | 215(42.4%) | 150(29.6%) | 142(28%) |
| Do you think IUCD appropriate for female at high risk of getting STI | 128(25.2%) | 223(44%) | 156(30.8%) |
| IUCD don’t interference with sexual intercourse or desire? | 190(37.5%) | 166(32.7%) | 151(28.9%) |
| Do you think IUCD is immediately reversible? (become pregnant quickly when removed) | 196(38.7%) | 156(30.8%) | 155(30.6%) |
| IUCD does not can cause cancer? | 212(41.8%) | 142(28%) | 153(30.2%) |
| Do you think Implant can prevent pregnancies for 3–5 years? | 276(54.4%) | 80(15.8%) | 151(29.8%) |
| Do Implants require minor surgical procedure during insertion and removal? | 265(52.3%) | 90(17.8%) | 152(30.0%) |
| Do you think Implants is immediately reversible? | 242(47.7%) | 101(19.9%) | 164(32.3%) |
| Does female sterilization need an operation to be performed? | 215(42.4%) | 117(23.1%) | 175(34.5%) |
| LAPMs do not cause ectopic pregnancy? | 201(39.6%) | 123(24.3%) | 183(36.1%) |
IUCD intrauterine contraceptive device, LAPMS long acting and permanent contraceptive method, STI sexually transmitted infection
Attitude of respondents on utilization of LAPMs in west Guji zone, 2018 G.C
| Disagree | Not sure | Agree | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The insertion and removal of implant is highly painful | 187 (36.9%) | 131 (25.8) | 189 (37.3%) |
| Insertion of IUCD causes loss of pregnancy | 122 (24.1%) | 167 (32.9%) | 218 (43%) |
| Using IUCD prevents from doing heavy work | 170 (33.5%) | 165 (32.5%) | 172 (33.9%) |
| Operation for female sterilization is dangerous | 128 (25.2%) | 203 (40%) | 176 (34.7%) |
| IUCD and implant cause infertility | 196 (38.7%) | 186 (36.7) | 125 (24.7%) |
| The IUCD will get stuck in my uterus | 183 (36.1%) | 179 (35.3%) | 145 (28.6%) |
| Nulliparous women shouldn’t have used an IUCD | 138 (27.2%) | 172 (33.9%) | 197 (38.9%) |
| IUCD will not fit in my uterus | 196 (38.7%) | 191 (37.7%) | 120 (23.7%) |
IUCD Intrauterine contraceptive device
Practice of respondents on long acting and permanent contraceptive methods of west Guji Zone (N = 507)
| Practice of respondents | Frequency | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Have you ever used LAPMs? | ||
| Yes | 217 | 42.8 |
| No | 290 | 57.2 |
| If yes, Have you ever used implant? | 205 | 40.4 |
| If yes, Have you ever used IUCD? | 12 | 2.4 |
| If yes, Have you ever used vasectomy? | 0 | 0 |
| If yes, Have you ever used tubal ligation? | 0 | 0 |
| Reason for stop using LAPMs | ||
| Fear of side effect | 109 | 21.5 |
| Partners disapprove | 111 | 21.9 |
| Medical problem | 20 | 3.9 |
| Shift to other method | 34 | 6.7 |
| I want a child | 25 | 4.9 |
| Religious opposition | 22 | 4.3 |
| Don’t know | 43 | 8.5 |
| Reason for currently using long acting and permanent contraceptive method | ||
| Have enough child | 59 | 11.6 |
| Pressure from my husband | 37 | 7.3 |
| Want to space | 123 | 24.3 |
| Advice from health professional | 144 | 28.4 |
| Reason for not practicing LAPMS | ||
| Fear of side effect | 113 | 22.3 |
| Service unavailability | 9 | 1.8 |
| Partner disapprove | 147 | 29 |
| Medical problem | 32 | 6.3 |
| Shift to other method | 40 | 7.9 |
| Lack of knowledge | 79 | 15.6 |
IUCD - intrauterine contraceptive device, LAPMS - long acting and permanent contraceptive method
Perceived service quality of respondents on long acting and permanent contraceptive methods of West Guji zone in 2018 (N = 507)
| Frequency | Percent | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| During your visit to health facility how were you treated by the other staff? | Very well | 236 | 46.5 |
| well | 110 | 21.7 | |
| Not very well/poorly | 159 | 31.4 | |
| There was no other staff | 2 | 0.4 | |
| How long did you wait to get service at the facility? | < 15 min | 14 | 2.8 |
| 16–30 min | 129 | 25.4 | |
| 31–45 min | 122 | 24.1 | |
| 46–60 min | 67 | 13.2 | |
| 61–90 min | 66 | 13 | |
| 91–120 min | 66 | 13 | |
| > 120 min | 38 | 7.5 | |
| Don’t know | 5 | 1 | |
| How do you feel about your waiting time? | No waiting time | 73 | 14.4 |
| Reasonable/short time | 218 | 43 | |
| Too long | 209 | 41.2 | |
| Don’t know | 7 | 1.4 | |
| Did the provider ask if you were having a problem with the method that you used? | Yes | 460 | 90.7 |
| No | 47 | 9.3 | |
| Have you had a problem with your method?, that you wanted to discuss with your provider | Yes | 421 | 83 |
| No | 86 | 17 | |
| Did the provider try to understand the nature of your problem? | Yes | 332 | 65.5 |
| No | 175 | 48.3 | |
| Did the provider suggest what you should do (action you should take) to resolve the problem? | Yes | 302 | 59.6 |
| No | 205 | 40.2 | |
| Were you satisfied with the advice or treatment that you received for your problem? | Yes | 443 | 87.4 |
| No | 64 | 12.6 |
Factors associated with utilization of LAPMs among women of reproductive age group in west Guji zone, 2018
| Variables | Utilization of LAPM | COR(95% CI) | AOR(95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||
| Family size | ||||
| 1–3 | 210 | 225 | 1 | 1 |
| ≥ 4 | 49 | 23 | 0.438(0.258–0.744) | 1.54(0.21–11.34) |
| Educational level of women | ||||
| Informal | 21 | 26 | 1 | |
| Grade 1–8 | 70 | 61 | 0.704(0.36–1.375) | 0.78(0.172–3.53) |
| Grade 9–12 | 115 | 28 | 0.197(0.097–0.399) | 0.116 (0.023–0.593) * |
| College or university | 30 | 10 | 0.269(0.12–0.674) | 0.446(0.055–3.644) |
| Parity | ||||
| 1–2 | 45 | 115 | 1 | 1 |
| ≥ 3 | 192 | 103 | 0.210(0.138–0.319) | 0.082(0.026–0.253)* |
| Accept LAPMs | ||||
| Yes | 239 | 142 | 1 | 1 |
| No | 20 | 106 | 0.112(0.067–0.189) | 0.029(0.005–0.162)* |
| Husband opinion | ||||
| Support | 164 | 112 | 1 | 1 |
| Oppose | 56 | 90 | 0.425(0.28–0.64) | 0.74(0.179–3.1) |
| How treated by other staff | ||||
| Well | 234 | 112 | 1 | 1 |
| Not very well | 25 | 136 | 0.088(0.054–0.143) | 0.06(0.017–0.213)* |
| Reasonable waiting time | ||||
| No waiting time | 42 | 31 | 1 | 1 |
| Reasonable/short | 182 | 36 | 0.038(0.023–0.064) | 0.022(0.005–0.087)* |
| Too long | 35 | 181 | 0.143(0.079–0.257) | 0.098(0.026–0.376)* |
| Service satisfaction | ||||
| Yes | 222 | 187 | 0.511(0.325–0.803) | 1.1(0.28–4) |
| No | 37 | 61 | 1 | 1 |
| Ever use LAPM | ||||
| Yes | 130 | 87 | 0.536(0.375–0.766) | 0.94(0.33–2.68) |
| No | 129 | 161 | 1 | |
| Level of knowledge | ||||
| Poor knowledge | 115 | 174 | 1 | 1 |
| Good knowledge | 41 | 30 | 0.484(0.286–0.819) | 1.04(0.21–5.2) |
| Very good knowledge | 103 | 44 | 0.282(0.185–0.432) | 0.5(0.166–1.58) |
AOD adjusted odds ratio, CI confidence interval, COR crude odds ratio, LAPMS long acting and permanent contraceptive method, *Significant P value < 0.05