Joyce Li, Sriram Ramgopal1, Jennifer R Marin2. 1. Division of Emergency Medicine, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL. 2. Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were to estimate testing and treatment rates among pediatric low-acuity emergency department (ED) visits and to compare testing and treatment patterns at general and pediatric-specific EDs. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of triage level 4 or 5 pediatric visits from a complex survey of nonfederal US EDs from 2008 to 2017. We analyzed demographics, vital signs, disposition, testing, and treatment. We calculated proportions for each data element and used χ2 tests to determine differences between general and pediatric EDs. RESULTS: There were an estimated 306.2 million pediatric visits with 129.1 million acuity level 4 or 5 visits (57.2%; 95% confidence interval, 55.4%-58.9%), with diagnostic testing performed in 47.1% and medications administered in 69.6% of the visits. Most low-acuity visits (82.0%) were to general EDs. Tests performed more frequently in general EDs compared with pediatric EDs included radiographs (25.8% vs 15.7%, P < 0.01), complete blood count (6.4% vs 3.9%, P < 0.01), electrolytes (11.6% vs 3.7%, P < 0.01), and glucose (2.0% vs 0.9%, P < 0.01). Ultrasound was used less frequently in general EDs (0.5 vs 0.7, P < 0.01). There were similar rates of intravenous fluid and overall medication administration and a higher proportion of patients receiving antibiotics in general EDs (28.7% vs 23.8%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: More than half of pediatric visits to the ED are low acuity. Although general EDs relied on more imaging, blood testing and antibiotics, and pediatric EDs on ultrasound, overall resource utilization was high in this population across both ED types and can likely be reduced.
OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were to estimate testing and treatment rates among pediatric low-acuity emergency department (ED) visits and to compare testing and treatment patterns at general and pediatric-specific EDs. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of triage level 4 or 5 pediatric visits from a complex survey of nonfederal US EDs from 2008 to 2017. We analyzed demographics, vital signs, disposition, testing, and treatment. We calculated proportions for each data element and used χ2 tests to determine differences between general and pediatric EDs. RESULTS: There were an estimated 306.2 million pediatric visits with 129.1 million acuity level 4 or 5 visits (57.2%; 95% confidence interval, 55.4%-58.9%), with diagnostic testing performed in 47.1% and medications administered in 69.6% of the visits. Most low-acuity visits (82.0%) were to general EDs. Tests performed more frequently in general EDs compared with pediatric EDs included radiographs (25.8% vs 15.7%, P < 0.01), complete blood count (6.4% vs 3.9%, P < 0.01), electrolytes (11.6% vs 3.7%, P < 0.01), and glucose (2.0% vs 0.9%, P < 0.01). Ultrasound was used less frequently in general EDs (0.5 vs 0.7, P < 0.01). There were similar rates of intravenous fluid and overall medication administration and a higher proportion of patients receiving antibiotics in general EDs (28.7% vs 23.8%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: More than half of pediatric visits to the ED are low acuity. Although general EDs relied on more imaging, blood testing and antibiotics, and pediatric EDs on ultrasound, overall resource utilization was high in this population across both ED types and can likely be reduced.