Literature DB >> 35100364

Environment-specific genomic prediction ability in maize using environmental covariates depends on environmental similarity to training data.

Anna R Rogers1, James B Holland1,2,3.   

Abstract

Technology advances have made possible the collection of a wealth of genomic, environmental, and phenotypic data for use in plant breeding. Incorporation of environmental data into environment-specific genomic prediction is hindered in part because of inherently high data dimensionality. Computationally efficient approaches to combining genomic and environmental information may facilitate extension of genomic prediction models to new environments and germplasm, and better understanding of genotype-by-environment (G × E) interactions. Using genomic, yield trial, and environmental data on 1,918 unique hybrids evaluated in 59 environments from the maize Genomes to Fields project, we determined that a set of 10,153 SNP dominance coefficients and a 5-day temporal window size for summarizing environmental variables were optimal for genomic prediction using only genetic and environmental main effects. Adding marker-by-environment variable interactions required dimension reduction, and we found that reducing dimensionality of the genetic data while keeping the full set of environmental covariates was best for environment-specific genomic prediction of grain yield, leading to an increase in prediction ability of 2.7% to achieve a prediction ability of 80% across environments when data were masked at random. We then measured how prediction ability within environments was affected under stratified training-testing sets to approximate scenarios commonly encountered by plant breeders, finding that incorporation of marker-by-environment effects improved prediction ability in cases where training and test sets shared environments, but did not improve prediction in new untested environments. The environmental similarity between training and testing sets had a greater impact on the efficacy of prediction than genetic similarity between training and test sets. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Genetics Society of America 2021. This work is written by US Government employees and is in the public domain in the US.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dominance genetic variance; environmental covariates; genomic prediction; genotype-by-environment interactions; multienvironment; shared data resource

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35100364      PMCID: PMC9245610          DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkab440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)        ISSN: 2160-1836            Impact factor:   3.542


  32 in total

Review 1.  Genomic prediction in animals and plants: simulation of data, validation, reporting, and benchmarking.

Authors:  Hans D Daetwyler; Mario P L Calus; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Gustavo de Los Campos; John M Hickey
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genetic signatures of high-altitude adaptation in Tibetans.

Authors:  Jian Yang; Zi-Bing Jin; Jie Chen; Xiu-Feng Huang; Xiao-Man Li; Yuan-Bo Liang; Jian-Yang Mao; Xin Chen; Zhili Zheng; Andrew Bakshi; Dong-Dong Zheng; Mei-Qin Zheng; Naomi R Wray; Peter M Visscher; Fan Lu; Jia Qu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Accelerating crop genetic gains with genomic selection.

Authors:  Kai Peter Voss-Fels; Mark Cooper; Ben John Hayes
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  A reaction norm model for genomic selection using high-dimensional genomic and environmental data.

Authors:  Diego Jarquín; José Crossa; Xavier Lacaze; Philippe Du Cheyron; Joëlle Daucourt; Josiane Lorgeou; François Piraux; Laurent Guerreiro; Paulino Pérez; Mario Calus; Juan Burgueño; Gustavo de los Campos
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Joint Use of Genome, Pedigree, and Their Interaction with Environment for Predicting the Performance of Wheat Lines in New Environments.

Authors:  Réka Howard; Daniel Gianola; Osval Montesinos-López; Philomin Juliana; Ravi Singh; Jesse Poland; Sandesh Shrestha; Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez; José Crossa; Diego Jarquín
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 3.154

6.  Genomic prediction models for grain yield of spring bread wheat in diverse agro-ecological zones.

Authors:  C Saint Pierre; J Burgueño; J Crossa; G Fuentes Dávila; P Figueroa López; E Solís Moya; J Ireta Moreno; V M Hernández Muela; V M Zamora Villa; P Vikram; K Mathews; C Sansaloni; D Sehgal; D Jarquin; P Wenzl; Sukhwinder Singh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Genomic and environmental determinants and their interplay underlying phenotypic plasticity.

Authors:  Xin Li; Tingting Guo; Qi Mu; Xianran Li; Jianming Yu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Multi-environment Genomic Prediction of Plant Traits Using Deep Learners With Dense Architecture.

Authors:  Abelardo Montesinos-López; Osval A Montesinos-López; Daniel Gianola; José Crossa; Carlos M Hernández-Suárez
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  BGGE: A New Package for Genomic-Enabled Prediction Incorporating Genotype × Environment Interaction Models.

Authors:  Italo Granato; Jaime Cuevas; Francisco Luna-Vázquez; Jose Crossa; Osval Montesinos-López; Juan Burgueño; Roberto Fritsche-Neto
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Combining Crop Growth Modeling and Statistical Genetic Modeling to Evaluate Phenotyping Strategies.

Authors:  Daniela Bustos-Korts; Martin P Boer; Marcos Malosetti; Scott Chapman; Karine Chenu; Bangyou Zheng; Fred A van Eeuwijk
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 5.753

View more
  2 in total

1.  Outlook for Implementation of Genomics-Based Selection in Public Cotton Breeding Programs.

Authors:  Grant T Billings; Michael A Jones; Sachin Rustgi; William C Bridges; James B Holland; Amanda M Hulse-Kemp; B Todd Campbell
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-29

2.  Optimizing predictions in IRRI's rice drought breeding program by leveraging 17 years of historical data and pedigree information.

Authors:  Apurva Khanna; Mahender Anumalla; Margaret Catolos; Sankalp Bhosale; Diego Jarquin; Waseem Hussain
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 6.627

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.