Literature DB >> 35100077

Balancing the Freedom-Security Trade-Off During Crises and Disasters.

Nathan N Cheek1, Elena Reutskaja2, Barry Schwartz3.   

Abstract

During crises and disasters, such as hurricanes, terrorist threats, or pandemics, policymakers must often increase security at the cost of freedom. Psychological science, however, has shown that the restriction of freedom may have strong negative consequences for behavior and health. We suggest that psychology can inform policy both by elucidating some negative consequences of lost freedom (e.g., depression or behavioral reactance) and by revealing strategies to address them. We propose four interlocking principles that can help policymakers restore the freedom-security balance. Careful consideration of the psychology of freedom can help policymakers develop policies that most effectively promote public health, safety, and well-being when crises and disasters strike.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; framing; freedom; public health; security

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35100077     DOI: 10.1177/17456916211034499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci        ISSN: 1745-6916


  1 in total

1.  The value conflict between freedom and security: Explaining the variation of COVID-19 policies in democracies and autocracies.

Authors:  Nicole J Saam; Carmen Friedrich; Henriette Engelhardt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 3.752

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.