Literature DB >> 35099840

A global perspective on embryological and fetal collections: Where to from here?

Joyce El-Haddad1, Goran Štrkalj, Nalini Pather.   

Abstract

Human fetal and embryos collections (FECs) peaked in the late 19th century, an era before informed consent, and hence have unclear provenance. These collections are not only historical artifacts, but prized resources for education and research. This study aimed to determine, via a narrative review, the present location, status, and profile of reported human fetal and embryonic collections. Twenty-seven articles that reported on collections appropriate to the study were selected from an initial search pool of 120 articles. The reported collections were in: Australia (n = 1), Germany (n = 6), Japan (n = 1), Spain (n = 1), and the United States (n = 5). The largest collection is reported to contain 45,000 prenatal remains and the smallest, three remains. The purpose of establishing majority of the collections was for education and research. Eight collections contain both embryos and fetuses, one collection contained embryos, exclusively. Another collection contained only fetuses and one neonatal cadaver. The provenance, where mentioned, specified gynecologists and obstetricians as the main source of remains (n = 5). Except for the Kyoto Collection, information regarding informed consent from the next-of-kin was lacking. This paper draws upon the three themes of purpose, provenance, and profile and highlights the need to establish agreed international guidelines for the most appropriate ethical and sustainable practice with respect to establishment, procurement of remains, access, and maintenance of these collections. Nine domains for these guidelines are recommended: consent, privacy, commercial gain, digital and emerging technologies, commemorations and memorials, destruction and disposal, dignity of donors, global database and collaboration, and sustainability.
© 2022 American Association for Anatomy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anatomical collections; education; embryo; fetal; gestational age; humanistic anatomy; medical ethics; medical history; provenance

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35099840     DOI: 10.1002/ar.24863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)        ISSN: 1932-8486            Impact factor:   2.064


  2 in total

1.  Evolution of a discipline-The changing face of anatomy.

Authors:  Jason M Organ; Amber R Comer
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 2.227

Review 2.  Evolving strategies in whirlwind mode: The changing face of anatomy education during Covid-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Sanjib Kumar Ghosh
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 6.652

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.