Ali Rashidi1, Lucia Baratto1, Ashok Joseph Theruvath1, Elton Benjamin Greene2, K Elizabeth Hawk1, Rong Lu3, Michael P Link4, Sheri L Spunt4, Heike E Daldrup-Link5,6,7. 1. Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, Pediatric Radiology, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. 3. Quantitative Sciences Unit, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Hematology/Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. 5. Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. H.E.Daldrup-Link@stanford.edu. 6. Department of Pediatrics, Hematology/Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. H.E.Daldrup-Link@stanford.edu. 7. Department of Radiology, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford University School of Medicine, 725 Welch Rd, Stanford, CA, 94305-5654, USA. H.E.Daldrup-Link@stanford.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-enhanced positron emission tomography (2-[18F]FDG-PET) and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) for the detection of bone marrow metastases in children and young adults with solid malignancies. METHODS: In this cross-sectional single-center institutional review board-approved study, we investigated twenty-three children and young adults (mean age, 16.8 years ± 5.1 [standard deviation]; age range, 7-25 years; 16 males, 7 females) with 925 bone marrow metastases who underwent 66 simultaneous 2-[18F]FDG-PET and DW-MRI scans including 23 baseline scans and 43 follow-up scans after chemotherapy between May 2015 and July 2020. Four reviewers evaluated all foci of bone marrow metastasis on 2-[18F]FDG-PET and DW-MRI to assess concordance and measured the tumor-to-bone marrow contrast. Results were assessed with a one-sample Wilcoxon test and generalized estimation equation. Bone marrow biopsies and follow-up imaging served as the standard of reference. RESULTS: The reviewers detected 884 (884/925, 95.5%) bone marrow metastases on 2-[18F]FDG-PET and 893 (893/925, 96.5%) bone marrow metastases on DW-MRI. We found different "blind spots" for 2-[18F]FDG-PET and MRI: 2-[18F]FDG-PET missed subcentimeter lesions while DW-MRI missed lesions in small bones. Sensitivity and specificity were 91.0% and 100% for 18F-FDG-PET, 89.1% and 100.0% for DW-MRI, and 100.0% and 100.0% for combined modalities, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of combined 2-[18F]FDG-PET/MRI (100.0%) was significantly higher compared to either 2-[18F]FDG-PET (96.9%, p < 0.001) or DW-MRI (96.3%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Both 2-[18F]FDG-PET and DW-MRI can miss bone marrow metastases. The combination of both imaging techniques detected significantly more lesions than either technique alone. KEY POINTS: • DW-MRI and 2-[18F]FDG-PET have different strengths and limitations for the detection of bone marrow metastases in children and young adults with solid tumors. • Both modalities can miss bone marrow metastases, although the "blind spot" of each modality is different. • A combined PET/MR imaging approach will achieve maximum sensitivity and specificity for the detection of bone marrow metastases in children with solid tumors.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-enhanced positron emission tomography (2-[18F]FDG-PET) and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) for the detection of bone marrow metastases in children and young adults with solid malignancies. METHODS: In this cross-sectional single-center institutional review board-approved study, we investigated twenty-three children and young adults (mean age, 16.8 years ± 5.1 [standard deviation]; age range, 7-25 years; 16 males, 7 females) with 925 bone marrow metastases who underwent 66 simultaneous 2-[18F]FDG-PET and DW-MRI scans including 23 baseline scans and 43 follow-up scans after chemotherapy between May 2015 and July 2020. Four reviewers evaluated all foci of bone marrow metastasis on 2-[18F]FDG-PET and DW-MRI to assess concordance and measured the tumor-to-bone marrow contrast. Results were assessed with a one-sample Wilcoxon test and generalized estimation equation. Bone marrow biopsies and follow-up imaging served as the standard of reference. RESULTS: The reviewers detected 884 (884/925, 95.5%) bone marrow metastases on 2-[18F]FDG-PET and 893 (893/925, 96.5%) bone marrow metastases on DW-MRI. We found different "blind spots" for 2-[18F]FDG-PET and MRI: 2-[18F]FDG-PET missed subcentimeter lesions while DW-MRI missed lesions in small bones. Sensitivity and specificity were 91.0% and 100% for 18F-FDG-PET, 89.1% and 100.0% for DW-MRI, and 100.0% and 100.0% for combined modalities, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of combined 2-[18F]FDG-PET/MRI (100.0%) was significantly higher compared to either 2-[18F]FDG-PET (96.9%, p < 0.001) or DW-MRI (96.3%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Both 2-[18F]FDG-PET and DW-MRI can miss bone marrow metastases. The combination of both imaging techniques detected significantly more lesions than either technique alone. KEY POINTS: • DW-MRI and 2-[18F]FDG-PET have different strengths and limitations for the detection of bone marrow metastases in children and young adults with solid tumors. • Both modalities can miss bone marrow metastases, although the "blind spot" of each modality is different. • A combined PET/MR imaging approach will achieve maximum sensitivity and specificity for the detection of bone marrow metastases in children with solid tumors.
Authors: M Paulussen; S Ahrens; S Burdach; A Craft; B Dockhorn-Dworniczak; J Dunst; B Fröhlich; W Winkelmann; A Zoubek; H Jürgens Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 1998-03 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Marilena Cesari; Alberto Righi; Marco Colangeli; Marco Gambarotti; Paolo Spinnato; Andrea Ferraro; Alessandra Longhi; Massimo Eraldo Abate; Emanuela Palmerini; Anna Paioli; Cristina Ferrari; Davide Maria Donati; Piero Picci; Stefano Ferrari Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2019-02-05 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Odile Oberlin; Annie Rey; Elizabeth Lyden; Gianni Bisogno; Michael C G Stevens; William H Meyer; Modesto Carli; James R Anderson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-05-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Aaron R Weiss; Elizabeth R Lyden; James R Anderson; Douglas S Hawkins; Sheri L Spunt; David O Walterhouse; Suzanne L Wolden; David M Parham; David A Rodeberg; Simon C Kao; Richard B Womer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-08-12 Impact factor: 44.544