Literature DB >> 35099523

Evaluating the Findings of the IMPACT-C Randomized Clinical Trial to Improve COVID-19 Vaccine Coverage in Skilled Nursing Facilities.

Sarah D Berry1,2, Keith S Goldfeld3, Kevin McConeghy4,5, David Gifford6, H Edward Davidson7, Lisa Han7, Maggie Syme1, Ashvin Gandhi8, Susan L Mitchell1,2, Jill Harrison4, Amy Recker4, Kimberly S Johnson9,10, Stefan Gravenstein4,11, Vincent Mor4,5.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Identifying successful strategies to increase COVID-19 vaccination among skilled nursing facility (SNF) residents and staff is integral to preventing future outbreaks in a continually overwhelmed system.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a multicomponent vaccine campaign would increase vaccine rates among SNF residents and staff. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a cluster randomized trial with a rapid timeline (December 2020-March 2021) coinciding with the Pharmacy Partnership Program (PPP). It included 133 SNFs in 4 health care systems across 16 states: 63 and 70 facilities in the intervention and control arms, respectively, and participants included 7496 long-stay residents (>100 days) and 17 963 staff.
INTERVENTIONS: Multicomponent interventions were introduced at the facility level that included: (1) educational material and electronic messaging for staff; (2) town hall meetings with frontline staff (nurses, nurse aides, dietary, housekeeping); (3) messaging from community leaders; (4) gifts (eg, T-shirts) with socially concerned messaging; (5) use of a specialist to facilitate consent with residents' proxies; and (6) funds for additional COVID-19 testing of staff/residents. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcomes of this study were the proportion of residents (from electronic medical records) and staff (from facility logs) who received a COVID-19 vaccine (any), examined as 2 separate outcomes. Mixed-effects generalized linear models with a binomial distribution were used to compare outcomes between arms, using intent-to-treat approach. Race was examined as an effect modifier in the resident outcome model.
RESULTS: Most facilities were for-profit (95; 71.4%), and 1973 (26.3%) of residents were Black. Among residents, 82.5% (95% CI, 81.2%-83.7%) were vaccinated in the intervention arm, compared with 79.8% (95% CI, 78.5%-81.0%) in the usual care arm (marginal difference 0.8%; 95% CI, -1.9% to 3.7%). Among staff, 49.5% (95% CI, 48.4%-50.6%) were vaccinated in the intervention arm, compared with 47.9% (95% CI, 46.9%-48.9%) in usual care arm (marginal difference: -0.4%; 95% CI, -4.2% to 3.1%). There was no association of race with the outcome among residents. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: A multicomponent vaccine campaign did not have a significant effect on vaccination rates among SNF residents or staff. Among residents, vaccination rates were high. However, half the staff remained unvaccinated despite these efforts. Vaccination campaigns to target SNF staff will likely need to use additional approaches. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04732819.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35099523      PMCID: PMC8804975          DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.8067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  3 in total

Review 1.  COVID-19 Vaccination Hesitancy among Healthcare Workers-A Review.

Authors:  Christopher J Peterson; Benjamin Lee; Kenneth Nugent
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-15

2.  Association of State COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates With Staff Vaccination Coverage and Staffing Shortages in US Nursing Homes.

Authors:  Brian E McGarry; Ashvin D Gandhi; Maggie Syme; Sarah D Berry; Elizabeth M White; David C Grabowski
Journal:  JAMA Health Forum       Date:  2022-07-29

3.  Vaccine hesitancy and health care providers: Using the preferred cognitive styles and decision- making model and empathy tool to make progress.

Authors:  Caroline M Poland; Tamar Ratishvili
Journal:  Vaccine X       Date:  2022-06-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.