| Literature DB >> 35098075 |
Ozgur Erogul1, Leyla Eryigit Erogul2, Nilay Sen Korkmaz3, Fatih Celik4, Mustafa Dogan1, Hamidu Hamisi Gobeka2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to histopathologically compare patients with and without diabetes mellitus who underwent pterygium excision.Entities:
Keywords: Diabetes mellitus; inflammation; pterygium; vascularization
Year: 2020 PMID: 35098075 PMCID: PMC8784475 DOI: 10.14744/bej.2020.43434
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Beyoglu Eye J ISSN: 2459-1777
Criteria for histopathological examination of pterygium tissues (adapted from the study by Džunić et al. (8)
| Grade | Inflammation intensity | Degree of vascularization | Fibrinoid change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | No inflammatory infiltrate | Vascularization of pterygium resembles normal conjunctiva | No fibrinoid change |
| 1 | Sporadic, perivascular presence of lymphocytes | Presence of arteriole blood vessels is dominant in the region of the vascular stalk | Rare focal, perivascular fibrinoid changes |
| 2 | Multifocal chronic inflammatory infiltrate (mostly lymphocytes) | Presence of arterial blood vessels in the center of pterygium | A greater number of focal perivascular changes |
| 3 | Multifocal chronic inflammatory infiltrate (domination of plasmocytes) | A stronger presence of capillary blood vessels subepithelially and in the advanced region | A greater number of focal changes and sporadically subepithelial |
| 4 | Diffusive chronic inflammatory infiltrate | More expressed presence of arteriole blood vessels subepithelially and in the advanced region. | A greater number of focal and diffusively subepithelial and/or massive change in the progressive part |
General characteristics of the patients
| Total n=60 | Patients with DM n=30 | Patients without DM n=30 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years, mean | 58.6±12.8 | 63.6±9.6 | 53.7±13.7 |
| Gender, n (%) | |||
| Male | 28 (46.6) | 12 (40) | 16 (53.4) |
| Female | 32 (53.4) | 18 (60) | 14 (46.6) |
| Blood glucose, ng/dL, mean | - | 183±84.7 | 85±11 |
DM: Diabetes mellitus.
Comparison of histopathological values
| Patients with DM n=30 (%) | Patients without DM n=30 (%) | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Squamous metaplasia | Grade 1 n=22 (36.7) | Grade 1 n=24 (40) | 0.381 |
| Grade 2 n=8 (13.3) | Grade 2 n=6 (10) | ||
| Squamous dysplasia | Grade 1 n=5 (8.3) | Grade 1 n=6 (10) | 0.500 |
| Grade 2 n=25 (41.7) | Grade 2 n=24 (40) | ||
| Vascularization | Grade 1 n=3 (5) | Grade 1 n=4 (6.7) | 0.753 |
| Grade 2 n=21 (35) | Grade 2 n=22 (36.7) | ||
| Grade 3 n=6 (10) | Grade 3 n=4 (6.7) | ||
| Fibrinoid changes | Grade 0 n=1 (1.7) | Grade 0 n=1 (1.7) | 0.924 |
| Grade 1 n=6 (10) | Grade 1 n=9 (15) | ||
| Grade 2 n=9 (15) | Grade 2 n=8 (13.3) | ||
| Grade 3 n=11 (18.3) | Grade 3 n=10 (16.7) | ||
| Grade 4 n=3 (5) | Grade 4 n=2 (3.3) | ||
| Inflammation intensity | Grade 0 n=2 (3.3) | Grade 0 n=0 (0) | 0.181 |
| Grade 1 n=13 (21.7) | Grade 1 n=17 (28.3) | ||
| Grade 2 n=10 (16.7) | Grade 2 n=11 (18.3) | ||
| Grade 3 n=5 (8.3) | Grade 3 n=1 (1.7) | ||
| Grade 4 n=0 (0) | Grade 4 n=1 (1.7) |
Chi-square test; DM: Diabetes mellitus.