Swayam Kesari1,2, Alka B Garg2,3, Oliver Clemens4, Boby Joseph5, Rekha Rao1,2. 1. Solid State Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400085, India. 2. Homi Bhabha National Institute, Anushaktinagar, Mumbai 400094, India. 3. High Pressure & Synchrotron Radiation Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400085, India. 4. Institute for Materials Science, University of Stuttgart, Heisenbergstraße 3, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany. 5. Elettra-Sincrotrone Trieste S. C. p. A., S.S.14-km 163.5, Basovizza, Trieste 34149, Italy.
Abstract
The effect of high pressure on the structure of orthorhombic Mn3(VO4)2 is investigated using in situ Raman spectroscopy and X-ray powder diffraction up to high pressures of 26.2 and 23.4 GPa, respectively. The study demonstrates a pressure-induced structural phase transition starting at 10 GPa, with the coexistence of phases in the range of 10-20 GPa. The sluggish first-order phase transition is complete by 20 GPa. Importantly, the new phase could be recovered at ambient conditions. Raman spectra of the recovered new phase indicate increased distortion and as a consequence the lowering of the local symmetry of the VO4 tetrahedra. This behavior is different from that reported for isostructural compounds Zn3(VO4)2 and Ni3(VO4)2 where both show stable structures, although almost similar anisotropic compression of the unit cell is observed. The transition observed in orthorhombic Mn3(VO4)2 could be due to the internal charge transfer between the cations, which favors the structural transition at lower pressures and the eventual recovery of the new phase even upon pressure release in comparison to other isostructural compounds. The experimental equation of state parameters obtained for orthorhombic Mn3(VO4)2 match excellently with empirically calculated values reported earlier.
The effect of high pressure on the structure of orthorhombic Mn3(VO4)2 is investigated using in situ Raman spectroscopy and X-ray powder diffraction up to high pressures of 26.2 and 23.4 GPa, respectively. The study demonstrates a pressure-induced structural phase transition starting at 10 GPa, with the coexistence of phases in the range of 10-20 GPa. The sluggish first-order phase transition is complete by 20 GPa. Importantly, the new phase could be recovered at ambient conditions. Raman spectra of the recovered new phase indicate increased distortion and as a consequence the lowering of the local symmetry of the VO4 tetrahedra. This behavior is different from that reported for isostructural compounds Zn3(VO4)2 and Ni3(VO4)2 where both show stable structures, although almost similar anisotropic compression of the unit cell is observed. The transition observed in orthorhombic Mn3(VO4)2 could be due to the internal charge transfer between the cations, which favors the structural transition at lower pressures and the eventual recovery of the new phase even upon pressure release in comparison to other isostructural compounds. The experimental equation of state parameters obtained for orthorhombic Mn3(VO4)2 match excellently with empirically calculated values reported earlier.
Searching novel materials with new phases/polymorphs
having desired
properties under different thermodynamic conditions is a topic of
recent interest because of their useful technological applications
and for understanding basic principles. Since vanadium shows multiple
oxidation states,[1] it forms different stoichiometric
oxides, showing a wide range of applications.[2−5] When vanadium forms oxide compounds
in combination with other magnetic ions, the vacant d-orbitals in
the vanadium atom serve as magnetic linking groups resulting in interesting
coupling behavior.[6−8]Orthovanadates of family A3(VO4)2 having Kagomé staircase
structures show
interesting magnetic transitions for A = Ni, Co,
Mn.[6−8] They have potential applications as electrodes in lithium ion batteries
when A = Ni, Co, Zn.[9] For A = Mg, Zn, Ni, Co, Mn, the family A3(VO4) of compounds commonly adopts an orthorhombic
structure with the Cmca space group at ambient conditions.[10−14] There exists another vanadate within the A3(VO4)2 family, namely, Cu3(VO4)2, which crystallizes in a triclinic structure
at ambient conditions but has a high-temperature polymorph of orthorhombic
structure (space group Cmca).[15] Similarly, Mn3(VO4)2 is
also reported to exist in a tetragonal structure (space group I4̅2d), which is a high-temperature
phase (which can be stabilized at ambient temperature via quenching
or substitution of Mn2+ by 2 Li+) called ht-Mn3(VO4)2 as against the thermodynamically
stable low-temperature orthorhombic phase, which is commonly called
lt-Mn3(VO4)2.[14]There exist some structural studies on the series
of compounds
LiMn3–(VO4)2 that report that its structure changes
from tetragonal (described by space group I4̅2d) to orthorhombic structure (described by space group ) when x is above
0.4.[14] Our earlier investigation of the
structural stability of the tetragonal compound Li0.2Mn2.9(VO4)2 at high pressures using Raman
spectroscopy and powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) revealed highly anisotropic
compression of the lattice, followed by an irreversible transition
to a disordered unidentified crystalline phase above 13 GPa.[16]In the literature, only two members, Zn3(VO4)2 and Ni3(VO4)2, of
the orthorhombic A3(VO4)2 have been studied under high pressure.[17,18] Both are reported to be stable up to 15 and 23 GPa, respectively,
with both exhibiting anisotropic compressibility, even though it is
less pronounced than that of the tetragonal compound Li0.2Mn2.9(VO4)2.[16] The triclinic form of Cu3(VO4)2 has been recently reported to decompose under pressure at
a moderate pressure of 1.35 GPa to CuO and V2O5.[19] As mentioned earlier, the compound
Mn3(VO4)2 exists in two polymorphs,
and it is interesting to study both under high pressure for possible
new phases in comparison to isostructural compounds Zn3(VO4)2 and Ni3(VO4)2. Apart from the basic research interest, knowledge of high-pressure
structural transitions and fundamental properties such as bulk modulus
is essential for technological applications. It is reported that in
this class of compounds A3(VO4)2, compressibility is decided by that of AO6 octahedra.[17,18] The VO4 tetrahedra
are supposed to be more rigid than the AO6 octahedra, and the bulk modulus in this family of compounds is given
by an empirical formula containing average A–O
distance and charge on A ion as parameters.[18] Therefore, initial structural parameters such
as bond lengths and octahedral distortions of AO6 play an important role in deciding the stability of the compound
at high pressures. Here, we report the results of vibrational and
structural investigations on lt-Mn3(VO4)2 at high pressures carried out using in situ Raman spectroscopic and powder XRD measurements up to 26.2 and 23.4
GPa, respectively. We also compare the ambient structural parameters,
relating them to the Raman spectra and subsequently to the stability
at high pressures in the A3(VO4)2 family of compounds with the orthorhombic (space group Cmca) structure. Furthermore, we have used Raman spectroscopy
to detect the local structural disturbance induced by symmetry lowering.
While initially the effect of pressure is to distort the AO6 octahedra, it affects the VO4 tetrahedra,
which is observed in the Raman spectra. Perturbation/distortion in
the AO6 network can lead to distortion
in VO4 tetrahedra resulting in structural transitions.
Some of the vanadates containing VO4 tetrahedra transform
into compounds with higher coordination of vanadium under high pressure
for better packing, resulting in a structural phase transition.[20] Raman spectroscopy is one of the most convenient
tools to study a change of coordination across transition, distortion
of the polyhedral units, and lowering of their site symmetries.
Experimental
Details
A polycrystalline sample of lt-Mn3(VO4)2 was synthesized by a solid-state reaction method
as described
in ref (14). The Raman
spectra were recorded on a micro-Raman spectrometer LabRAM HR-800
Evolution using 532 nm laser of power 5 mW and resolved with a grating
of 600 lines/mm, which gives a pixel coverage of 1.2 cm–1 and spectral resolution of 3 cm–1. Raman spectra
could be reproduced with an accuracy better than ±0.1 cm–1. For high-pressure Raman measurements, a few grains
of lt-Mn3(VO4)2, ruby (pressure marker),
and a pressure-transmitting medium (16:3:1 methanol–ethanol–water
mixture) were loaded inside a diamond anvil cell (Diacell B-05). The
pressure calibration is performed with the ruby fluorescence method[21] with error less than ±0.2 at 10 GPa and
less than ± 1 GPa at 25 GPa in the present experiment as measured
from the full width at half-maximum of the ruby R1 line and from its
position at different locations in the sample chamber in the diamond
anvil cell. The pressure-transmitting medium 16:3:1 methanol–ethanol–water
mixture remains hydrostatic up to 10.5 GPa, then quasi-hydrostatic
up to 20 GPa, and becomes nonhydrostatic above 20 GPa.[22,23] The angle dispersive powder X-ray diffraction (ADXRD) measurements
at various pressures were recorded at the Xpress beamline of Elettra
Synchrotron Source, Trieste, Italy. A Mao–Bell-type diamond
anvil cell was used for pressure generation, and the sample with a
few grains of platinum as in situ pressure marker,
along with the 16:3:1 methanol–ethanol–water mixture
as a pressure-transmitting medium, was loaded inside a 100 μm
hole of a stainless steel gasket. The pressure was calibrated using
the equation of state of platinum with an accuracy of 0.1 GPa.[24] An X-ray beam of wavelength 0.4957 Å collimated
to 80 μm was used to collect the powder diffraction data on
a MAR345 image plate area detector with a resolution of 100 μm
× 100 μm pixel size. Typically, data were collected for
an exposure time of 30 s at each pressure point. The sample-to-detector
distance along with various detector orientation parameters was refined
with FIT2D software[25] using the diffraction
pattern of CeO2. The same software was used to convert
two-dimensional diffraction rings from the sample to standard one-dimensional
intensity vs 2θ plots. The structural refinement of the diffraction
peaks from the sample and further data analysis was performed with
GSAS software.[26] Initially, the background
of the XRD pattern was fitted with a Chebyshev polynomial function,
followed by modeling the shape of Bragg peaks with the pseudo-Voigt
function. Due to the presence of texture in the patterns, the Le Bail
analysis method[27] available in GSAS software
was used to obtain the structural details at various pressures.
Results
and Discussion
Vibrational Properties at Ambient Conditions
The crystal
structure of A3(VO4)2 in the orthorhombic Cmca space group is depicted
in Figure , which
contains AO6 octahedra and VO4 tetrahedra in which each octahedron shares its edge with the three
adjacent octahedra and forms layers perpendicular to the [010] direction,
and these layers are interconnected by isolated VO4 tetrahedral
units.[17] The unit cell contains two formula
units in which the A-atoms reside at two crystallographically
distinct (A1 at 4a, A2 at 8e) Wyckoff sites, while the vanadium atoms
reside at the 8f site and the oxygen atoms reside
at 8f and 16g sites.[14] Therefore, there are 78 zone center phonons,
of which optic modes transform as Γoptic = 10Ag + 8B1g + 7B2g + 11B3g +
8Au + 12B1u + 11B2u + 8B3u. Among them, Ag, B1g, B2g, and
B3g are Raman active modes; all Au modes are
optically inactive; and the remaining modes are IR-active. Hence,
there is a maximum of 36 symmetry-allowed Raman modes at ambient conditions
for the orthorhombic Cmca structure.[28]
Figure 1
Structure of orthorhombic A3(VO4)2 in two orientations.
Structure of orthorhombic A3(VO4)2 in two orientations.Figure represents
the Raman spectra of orthorhombic lt-Mn3(VO4)2, Co3(VO4)2, and Ni3(VO4)2 at ambient conditions. All of
the observed Raman spectra match with the reported data,[16,28,29] and their assignments suggest
that the modes in the range of 500–900 cm–1 are predominantly due to the V–O stretching and are mixed
with some A–O stretching/bending modes. The
modes in the range of 200–500 cm–1 are bending
modes. The modes below 200 cm–1 are rigid motions
of VO4 tetrahedra and A–O6 octahedra. Major Raman modes of lt-Mn3(VO4)2 are assigned in accordance with our earlier polarized
Raman studies on Ni3(VO4)2,[28] and, accordingly, the V–O symmetric stretching
modes (Ag-symmetry) in lt-Mn3(VO4)2 are at 645, 811, and 793 cm–1 in
the high-frequency region due to the symmetric stretching of short
and long V–O bonds (all three bond lengths are given in Figure taken from the literature[12,14]). The asymmetries in the Raman spectra at around 686 and 783 cm–1 are the asymmetric V–O stretching modes (Bg-symmetry). Similarly, the symmetric (Ag) and asymmetric
(Bg) bending and external modes can be assigned in comparison
to that of Ni3(VO4)2. The most intense
modes in lt-Mn3(VO4)2, Co3(VO4)2, and Ni3(VO4)2 at ambient conditions appear at around 811, 815, and 826
cm–1, respectively. As shown in Table , which compares the reported
structural details of the three compounds, all of the three compounds
have almost similar average V–O bond lengths.[12,14] It appears that the most intense symmetric stretching frequency
depends predominantly on the radius of the ion A2+ and the tetrahedral distortion, similar to what has been
reported for AV2O6.[30] Accordingly, the lowest-size Ni2+-ion (0.69 Å)-containing compound has a large frequency of stretching
mode. It may be noted that the unit cell volume also increases from
Ni to Mn obeying Vegard’s law. While indicators such as elongation
and variance in angles have been used extensively in the literature
to describe the distortion in polyhedra,[31] we have used the parameter distortion index calculated from bond
lengths from the literature, which is compared with Raman data in AV2O6 and tungstate double perovskites.[30,32] For VO4 tetrahedra, the distortion index is calculated
from and for MnO6 octahedra is calculated
from , where d and ⟨d⟩ represent the bond length and average bond length
for the corresponding V–O/A–O bonds.
We have calculated these distortion indices using the bond lengths
reported in the literature[12,14] and are given in Table . Figure shows the variation of Raman
mode frequency of the highest-intensity V–O symmetric stretching
mode of lt-Mn3(VO4)2, Co3(VO4)2, and Ni3(VO4)2 with (a) VO4 tetrahedral distortion index (ΔTd) and (b) Shannon radius of cation A2+ (Mn2+, Co2+, Ni2+). Similar
to the family of AV2O6, where
the Raman frequency corresponding to the symmetric stretching increases
with octahedral distortion of VO6 octahedra, we have found
an increase in Raman frequency with an increase in VO4 tetrahedral
distortion.
Figure 2
Raman spectra of orthorhombic lt-Mn3(VO4)2, Co3(VO4)2, and Ni3(VO4)2 at ambient conditions.
Table 1
Comparison of Various Structural Parameters
of lt-Mn3(VO4)2, Co3(VO4)2, and Ni3(VO4)2 at Ambient Conditionsa
lt-Mn3(VO4)2
Co3(VO4)2
Ni3(VO4)2
ω (cm–1)
811
815
826
Shannon radii of A2+ (Å)
0.83(h)
0.745(h)
0.69
unit cell volume
(Å3)
623.4
575.5
555.7
density (g/cm3)
4.21
4.69
4.83
V–O1 (Å)
1.681
1.715
1.722
V–O2 (Å)
1.784
1.810
1.813
V–O3 (Å)
1.685
1.702
1.704
V–O3 (Å)
1.685
1.702
1.704
⟨V–O⟩av (Å)
1.717
1.732
1.736
ΔTd (10-4)
6.64
6.92
6.98
A1–O1 (Å)
2.12
2.031
2.017
A1–O1 (Å)
2.12
2.031
2.017
A1–O2 (Å)
2.23
2.124
2.084
A1–O2 (Å)
2.23
2.124
2.084
A1–O3 (Å)
2.23
2.124
2.084
A1–O3 (Å)
2.23
2.124
2.084
⟨A1–O⟩av (Å)
2.193
2.093
2.062
ΔOd (10-4)
5.59
4.11
2.42
A2–O1 (Å)
2.108
2.032
2.013
A2–O1 (Å)
2.108
2.032
2.013
A2–O2 (Å)
2.25
2.137
2.091
A2–O2 (Å)
2.25
2.137
2.091
A2–O3 (Å)
2.206
2.099
2.064
A2–O3 (Å)
2.206
2.099
2.064
⟨A2–O⟩av (Å)
2.188
2.09
2.056
ΔOd (10–4)
7.36
4.65
2.57
Distortion index for VO4 tetrahedra is calculated from and for AO6 octahedra is calculated from , where d and
⟨d⟩ represent the bond distance and
average bond distance
for the corresponding V–O/A–O bonds.
Figure 3
Variation of Raman mode frequency of the highest-intensity mode
of lt-Mn3(VO4)2, Co3(VO4)2, and Ni3(VO4)2 with (a) VO4 tetrahedral distortion index (ΔTd) and (b) Shannon radius of cation A2+ (Mn2+, Co2+, Ni2+).
Raman spectra of orthorhombic lt-Mn3(VO4)2, Co3(VO4)2, and Ni3(VO4)2 at ambient conditions.Variation of Raman mode frequency of the highest-intensity mode
of lt-Mn3(VO4)2, Co3(VO4)2, and Ni3(VO4)2 with (a) VO4 tetrahedral distortion index (ΔTd) and (b) Shannon radius of cation A2+ (Mn2+, Co2+, Ni2+).Distortion index for VO4 tetrahedra is calculated from and for AO6 octahedra is calculated from , where d and
⟨d⟩ represent the bond distance and
average bond distance
for the corresponding V–O/A–O bonds.It may be also noted from Table that the octahedral
distortion is larger in lt-Mn3(VO4)2 compared to the other two vanadates
owing to the larger ionic radius of Mn2+. It is interesting
to investigate if this distortion facilitates structural transition
under pressure. Even in other vanadates such as AV2O6,[30] distortion
of AO6 octahedra is less with smaller
ions such as Co2+ or Ni2+ as compared to that
in MnV2O6. It is also remarkable that among
the three vanadates being compared, lt-Mn3(VO4)2 has the lowest density and hence is more likely to
show structural transitions to denser phases under pressure.
Vibrational
Properties at High Pressures
Figure a,b depicts the Raman spectra
of lt-Mn3(VO4)2 up to 26.2 GPa in
the pressure-increasing cycle at a selected pressure in the various
regions. All of the modes show hardening behavior. While there is
no significant change in low-frequency modes, there is a change in
the intensity profile in the V–O stretching region, which is
clearly seen in Figure b. In the high-frequency region, at a pressure of about 2.5 GPa,
the intensity of the weak symmetric stretching (Ag) mode
at 793 cm–1 increases and becomes strong under further
pressurization, and the simultaneous decrease in the intensity of
the highest-frequency mode is observed. At around 9 GPa, the intensity
of the weak mode became comparable with the highest stretching mode
at 811 cm–1. Above 10 GPa, this weak mode becomes
the highest-intensity mode in the Raman spectra. Similar intensity
exchange behavior is seen in the Raman spectra of Pr2Ti2O7 across the structural phase transition.[33] Above 15 GPa, a new mode appears at around 875
cm–1 marked with an arrow in Figure b. This appearance of a new stretching mode
could be related to distortions in VO4 tetrahedra under
high pressure. Polyhedral distortions resulting in lowering of symmetry
and additional peaks in Raman spectra are observed in other oxides
also.[34] All of the weak modes disappear,
followed by the complete disappearance of the entire Raman spectra
above 23 GPa. This could be related to changes in the electronic structure
induced by high pressure. We pressurized the compound further up to
26.2 GPa, but we could not obtain Raman signals even at higher laser
power at the highest pressure achieved. Figure represents the variation of Raman mode frequencies
with pressure; all of the modes show gradual hardening behavior up
to 23 GPa. We have fitted the variation with a line in the two pressure
regions: one below 10 GPa where the intensity exchange behavior is
observed and the other above 10 GPa, which may indicate the coexistence
of the two-phase region. The pressure dependencies for all of the
modes are given in Table . We have also explored the compound in the decompression
cycle from 26.2 GPa, but we could recover the Raman signal only when
pressure was fully released, and the Raman spectra are different compared
to ambient Raman spectra as shown in Figure . The presence of hysteresis suggests the
transition is first order in nature; additional mode beyond the strongest
symmetric stretching mode is indicative of lowering of the local symmetry
of the VO4 tetrahedra. The new mode that appears beyond
15 GPa when extrapolated to ambient pressure is at 829 cm–1 and matches with the highest-frequency new mode in the pressure
released data. The proposed phase transition is at pressures when
the medium is quasi-hydrostatic, and we do not have experimental data
under perfectly hydrostatic conditions. Therefore, the role of nonhydrostaticity
in bringing about transition above 10 GPa cannot be excluded in the
present investigation.
Figure 4
Raman spectra of lt-Mn3(VO4)2 at
various pressures up to 26.2 GPa in the pressure-increasing cycle
(a) in full range and (b) in the V–O stretching region showing
the appearance of a new peak indicated by the arrow mark.
Figure 5
Variation of Raman mode frequencies of lt-Mn3(VO4)2 with pressure. The solid line indicates linear
fitting to the data and the change of color in the solid lines demarcates
the two phases.
Table 2
Raman Mode Frequency
of lt-Mn3(VO4)2 and Its Pressure
Dependence in
the Range up to 10 GPaa
Raman mode frequency
ωi (cm–1)
(cm–1/GPa)
isothermal mode Grüneisen parameter
102.3(1)
0.4(1)
0.5(1)
121.9(1)
1.2(1)
1.14(9)
148.2(5)
1.1(2)
0.9(1)
171.8(2)
2.7(1)
1.82(7)
242.3(2)
1.4(1)
0.67(5)
252.2(4)b
3.4(2)
1.56(9)
272.8(8)
4.5(2)
1.91(8)
320.3(1)
1.3(1)
0.47(4)
327.1(1)b
3.9(4)
1.4(1)
376.8(2)
2.0(1)
0.61(3)
407.2(5)
3.5(2)
1.00(6)
435.8(4)
2.2(1)
0.58(3)
649.9(8)
5.5(2)
0.98(3)
690.2(3)
4.6(2)
0.77(3)
782.8(8)
1.35(2)
0.20(3)
796.1(3)
2.0(2)
0.29(3)
809.2(2)
2.8(2)
0.40(3)
The isothermal
mode Grüneisen
parameters are calculated using zero-pressure bulk modulus B0 = 116 GPa determined from high-pressure XRD.
Indicates modes that appear
only
at high pressures due to lifting of degeneracy.
Figure 6
Comparison of Raman spectra of lt-Mn3(VO4)2 at ambient conditions before (black)
and after recovering
from 26.2 GPa from different regions (blue). New modes of the high-pressure
phase are denoted by red arrow marks. Note that the highest-frequency
mode (denoted by red arrows) corresponds to the new mode that appears
in the high-pressure phase beyond 15 GPa in the pressure-increasing
cycle.
Raman spectra of lt-Mn3(VO4)2 at
various pressures up to 26.2 GPa in the pressure-increasing cycle
(a) in full range and (b) in the V–O stretching region showing
the appearance of a new peak indicated by the arrow mark.Variation of Raman mode frequencies of lt-Mn3(VO4)2 with pressure. The solid line indicates linear
fitting to the data and the change of color in the solid lines demarcates
the two phases.Comparison of Raman spectra of lt-Mn3(VO4)2 at ambient conditions before (black)
and after recovering
from 26.2 GPa from different regions (blue). New modes of the high-pressure
phase are denoted by red arrow marks. Note that the highest-frequency
mode (denoted by red arrows) corresponds to the new mode that appears
in the high-pressure phase beyond 15 GPa in the pressure-increasing
cycle.The isothermal
mode Grüneisen
parameters are calculated using zero-pressure bulk modulus B0 = 116 GPa determined from high-pressure XRD.Indicates modes that appear
only
at high pressures due to lifting of degeneracy.It is clear that the compression
behavior in lt-Mn3(VO4)2 is different
from that reported in Li0.2Mn2.9(VO4)2 (which is isostructural
with tetragonal ht-Mn3(VO4)2). In
Li0.2Mn2.9(VO4)2, there
appeared a broad mode at a much lower frequency (750 cm–1), indicative of higher coordination of vanadium further leading
to a disordered phase. On the other hand, in orthorhombic lt-Mn3(VO4)2, the changes appear only near
the symmetric stretching region more like only distortion of tetrahedra
because of the change in different bond lengths.[35] The intensity exchange in the stretching-mode region at
around 10 GPa may indicate the beginning of a sluggish structural
change. At higher pressures, from the Raman spectroscopic study, it
is clear that the lattice structure of orthorhombic lt-Mn3(VO4)2 changes, which is reflected in Raman
spectra as a distortion of VO4 tetrahedra, and it fully
transforms into a new structure above 23 GPa. Therefore, we have also
investigated the structure of orthorhombic lt-Mn3(VO4)2 using high-pressure XRD, which is discussed
in the next section.
Structural Investigation at High Pressures
Figure shows the
evolution
of X-ray diffraction patterns of lt-Mn3(VO4)2 at various pressures. A few patterns collected while unloading
the pressure (marked with the letter r) are also shown in the same
figure. As seen, in addition to the diffraction peaks from the sample,
peaks from platinum used as an in situ pressure marker
and stainless steel used as a gasket are also observed. In the first
pattern collected at 0.5 GPa, all of the diffraction peaks emanating
from the samples could be fitted with the ambient orthorhombic Cmca phase. No major changes were observed in the diffraction
patterns collected up to 7.7 GPa, except for the shifting of diffraction
peaks to higher angles due to lattice compression. All of the patterns
up to 7.7 GPa could be fitted with the ambient orthorhombic phase.
In Figure , we show
the refined pattern at 5.3 and 9.9 GPa. Various residuals of the refinement, i.e., wRP and Rp, are 1.46% and 1.0% for 5.3 GPa data and 1.43% and 1.0%
for 9.9 GPa, respectively. A similar kind of refinement was obtained
for the data refined at other pressures. In the subsequent data collected
at 9.9 GPa, there is an appearance of an extra diffraction peak at
around 15° (2θ) indicated by an arrow in Figure . In the data collected at
10.8 GPa, there is another new broad peak at around 13.2° (2θ),
suggesting the onset of a structural transition. As the pressure is
increased further, till 16.2 GPa, the intensity of the emerging peaks
increases while the intensity of diffraction peaks from the ambient
phase reduces. This behavior indicates the coexistence of two phases
till 16.2 GPa. In the data collected at 20.1 GPa, the intensity of
most of the diffraction peaks from the ambient phase decreases below
the detection limit of the detector and the patterns consist of broad
peaks mainly from the high-pressure phase along with those from the
pressure marker and the gasket. This trend continues till 23.4 GPa,
the highest pressure reached in the present investigations. On pressure
release, the diffraction pattern remains similar to the one observed
at the highest pressure, except for the shifting of the peaks to lower
angles due to lattice decompression. The observations obtained in
the high-pressure XRD are consistent with the high-pressure Raman
investigations discussed in the previous section. Figure depicts XRD patterns of ambient
and pressure-retrieved lt-Mn3(VO4)2, which confirm the structural transition and the presence of the
high-pressure phase in the pressure-recovered lt-Mn3(VO4)2 whose diffraction peaks are marked with red
arrows. Note that due to the addition of a few weak broad peaks, we
could not refine the structure of the high-pressure phase.
Figure 7
X-ray powder
diffraction pattern of lt-Mn3(VO4)2 at various pressures. Arrows indicate the appearance
of new reflections, numbers show the pressure at which the pattern
is given, and r represents the releasing cycle. Pt indicates reflection
for platinum, and g the reflection from the stainless steel gasket.
Figure 8
(a, b) Fitted XRD pattern at (a) 5.3 GPa and (b) 9.9 GPa,
respectively.
The upper tick marks indicate the sample diffraction peaks while the
middle and lower tick marks indicate diffraction peaks from Pt (pressure
calibrant) and stainless steel (sample chamber), respectively. Various
residuals of the refinement, i.e., wRP and Rp, are 1.46% and 1.0% for 5.3 GPa
data and 1.43% and 1.0% for 9.9 GPa, respectively.
Figure 9
Comparison of XRD patterns of lt-Mn3(VO4)2 at ambient conditions before (blue), at 0.5 GPa in the forward
cycle (brown), and after recovering from 23.4 GPa (green). New peaks
of the high-pressure phase are denoted by red arrow marks. Gasket
and platinum peaks are also marked.
X-ray powder
diffraction pattern of lt-Mn3(VO4)2 at various pressures. Arrows indicate the appearance
of new reflections, numbers show the pressure at which the pattern
is given, and r represents the releasing cycle. Pt indicates reflection
for platinum, and g the reflection from the stainless steel gasket.(a, b) Fitted XRD pattern at (a) 5.3 GPa and (b) 9.9 GPa,
respectively.
The upper tick marks indicate the sample diffraction peaks while the
middle and lower tick marks indicate diffraction peaks from Pt (pressure
calibrant) and stainless steel (sample chamber), respectively. Various
residuals of the refinement, i.e., wRP and Rp, are 1.46% and 1.0% for 5.3 GPa
data and 1.43% and 1.0% for 9.9 GPa, respectively.Comparison of XRD patterns of lt-Mn3(VO4)2 at ambient conditions before (blue), at 0.5 GPa in the forward
cycle (brown), and after recovering from 23.4 GPa (green). New peaks
of the high-pressure phase are denoted by red arrow marks. Gasket
and platinum peaks are also marked.The variation of lattice parameters and the unit cell volume with
pressure obtained by refinement of X-ray diffraction data for lt-Mn3(VO4)2 is shown in Figure a,b. The variation of the
unit cell volume shown in Figure b and the variation of lattice parameters shown in Figure a have been fitted
with third-order Birch–Murnaghan equation of state (BM-EOS),
which is indicated by continuous curves in Figure a,b, and the axial compressibilities and
bulk modulus along with pressure derivative of bulk modulus have been
estimated. The fitted values of axial compressibilities are Ka = 3.1 × 10–3 GPa–1, Kb = 2.32 × 10–3 GPa–1, and Kc = 2.9 × 10–3 GPa–1. These data clearly show that the compressibility of the three axes
varies as Ka > Kc > Kb. Similar anisotropic
compression
of lattice parameters with pressure is observed for the other isostructural
compounds Zn3(VO4)2 and Ni3(VO4)2 (listed in Table for easier comparison)[17,18] where the authors predicted that the anisotropic behavior could
be due to the nature of the Kagomé layered crystal structure.
The obtained value of ambient pressure bulk modulus and the pressure
derivative of bulk modulus are 116(2) GPa and 2.6(5), respectively.
The bulk modulus obtained from the present experiment shows excellent
matching with the empirically estimated value of 115 GPa.[18] Experimental bulk modulus is in comparison with
the other isostructural members Zn3(VO4)2 (B0 = 115 (2) GPa, B0′ = 5.1(6))[17] and Ni3(VO4)2 (B0 = 139 (3) GPa, B0′ = 4.4(3)).[18] We have used this value of bulk modulus for
lt-Mn3(VO4)2 (B0 = 116 GPa) to calculate the isothermal mode Grüneisen
parameters listed in Table for all of the observed Raman modes using , which scales the phonon frequency with
unit cell volume. The isothermal mode Grüneisen parameters
for all of the observed Raman modes are positive.
Figure 10
Variation of (a) lattice
parameters with pressure. (b) Unit cell
volume with pressure. Symbols show the experimental data while the
solid line shows the third-order BM-EOS fitting to this data.
Table 3
Linear Compressibilities and Room-Temperature
Equation of State (EOS) Parameters of Zn3(VO4)2, Ni3(VO4)2, Li0.2Mn2.9(VO4)2, and lt-Mn3(VO4)2
orthorhombic
Zn3(VO4)2[17]
orthorhombic Ni3(VO4)2[18]
orthorhombic lt-Mn3(VO4)2 (present study)
Ka (GPa–1)
2.9(1) × 10–3
2.7(1) × 10–3
3.1 × 10–3
Kb (GPa–1)
1.9(1) × 10–3
1.79(6) × 10–3
2.3 × 10–3
Kc (GPa–1)
2.7(1) × 10–3
2.33(5) × 10–3
2.9 × 10–3
V0 (Å3)
585.0(4)
585.1(1)
555.7(2)
623.4(2)
624.5(5)
B0 (GPa)
115(2)
120(2)
139(3)
116(2)
106(1)
B0′
5.1(6)
4 (fixed)
4.4
2.6(5)
4
(fixed)
Variation of (a) lattice
parameters with pressure. (b) Unit cell
volume with pressure. Symbols show the experimental data while the
solid line shows the third-order BM-EOS fitting to this data.A remarkable
result of this study is the observation of a structural
transition, which is completed by 20 GPa. A similar result was also
seen in Li0.2Mn2.9(VO4)2 above 13 GPa.[16] The absence of any structural
transition in isostructural Zn and Ni compounds within the pressure
range explored (up to 15 GPa for Zn and up to 23 GPa for Ni compound)
could be due to the lesser octahedral distortion in the ambient structure
in these compounds as compared to Mn compounds.As has been
described in ref (8), the band gap in Mn3(VO4)2 corresponds
to a charge transfer from Mn2+ to V5+ according
toThe
Raman investigation reported in this article
clearly indicates significant changes in the vanadium coordination
and distortion of the polyhedron. According to the pressure-coordination
rule,[36] increase of pressure tends to increase
the coordination number of the cations due to a decrease of the size
of the larger, more compressible anions. Since stabilization of V4+ in tetrahedral coordination is not possible, this might
also trigger such an internal charge transition, which might lead
to the irreversible charge transformation observed at higher pressures
for both modifications of Mn3(VO4)2. This could also be structurally supported from the behavior of
Mn3+ at high pressures, for which it has been reported
that the Jahn–Teller (JT) distortion of Mn3+ decreases
substantially under pressure leading to the appearance of new phases
in a wide variety of compounds such as in CaMn2O4,[37] GdMnO3,[38] Ca3Mn2[SiO4]2[O4H4],[39] LaMnO3,[40] etc. In CaMn2O4 and GdMnO3, the unit cell volume is reduced and
the disappearance/suppression of JT distortion in MnO6 in
the high-pressure phase is responsible for the structural phase transition
in both.[37,38] In LaMnO3, an insulator-to-metal
phase transition occurred under pressure due to the change of high
JT distortion to less JT distortion of MnO6 octahedra with
pressure, although the crystal structure remained unchanged.[39,40] In Ca3Mn2[SiO4]2[O4H4], the JT distortion of MnO4(OH)2 octahedra under pressure was suppressed totally and a gradual
transition of high-spin to low-spin electronic state of Mn3+ under high pressure appeared.[41]In lt-Mn3(VO4)2, the distortion
in the octahedra at the Mn2+ site at ambient conditions
is low compared to the above-listed compounds due to Mn being present
in the d5 high-spin divalent state. Therefore, we hypothesize
that the compression could decrease the band gap and favor the internal
charge transfer between the cations, which would be favorable for
Mn3(VO4)2 in comparison to other A3(VO4)2 compounds, and
explain the transition at lower pressures observed here. A pressure-induced
band-gap collapse is reported among InVO4, InNbO4, and InTaO4 across their phase transitions.[42] Since the data do not allow for a detailed structural
analysis to display the above-suggested model, it is of interest to
investigate this possibility in more detail in a follow-up study by
theoretical methods.
Conclusions
We have explored the
structural stability and vibrational behavior
of lt-Mn3(VO4)2 under compression
using in situ Raman spectroscopy and synchrotron
XRD measurements. The changes in the Raman spectra under pressure
suggest that there exists a pressure-induced structural change above
20 GPa. Furthermore, Raman spectroscopy indicates the local structural
distortion and symmetry lowering. Changes in XRD indicate pressure-induced
crystal structural change at around 10 GPa with coexistence in the
range of 10–20 GPa. The compressibility parameters of the orthorhombic
phase were analyzed using the third-order Birch–Murnaghan equations
of state. Equation of state of lt-Mn3(VO4)2 is obtained, and the bulk modulus obtained is comparable
with those reported earlier. Anisotropic reduction is seen in the
unit cell parameters that are comparable with those reported for the
isostructural compounds Zn3(VO4)2 and Ni3(VO4)2.
Authors: G Lawes; A B Harris; T Kimura; N Rogado; R J Cava; A Aharony; O Entin-Wohlman; T Yildirim; M Kenzelmann; C Broholm; A P Ramirez Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2005-08-19 Impact factor: 9.161
Authors: I Loa; P Adler; A Grzechnik; K Syassen; U Schwarz; M Hanfland; G K Rozenberg; P Gorodetsky; M P Pasternak Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2001-08-28 Impact factor: 9.161