| Literature DB >> 35096911 |
Qing Lin Zhang1, Jun Hua Wang1, Li Ying Sun1, Jian Bin Wang1, Yu Ma1, Yu Qi Zhang1.
Abstract
Purpose: To predict the prognosis of craniopharyngioma in children by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA).Entities:
Keywords: children; craniopharyngioma; optical coherence tomography angiography; prognosis evaluation; quantifying choroidal capillaries
Year: 2022 PMID: 35096911 PMCID: PMC8790536 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.819662
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) ISSN: 2296-858X
Figure 1CCD measurement figures: select the choroidal capillary layer, use OCTA vascular quantification 2.0 software to measure the density of the choroidal capillary layer in 3 × 3 mm mode, that is, the total area of blood flow divided by the total area of the layer (9 mm2) ×100%. (1A) shows the defined measurement level, between the parallel lines is the choroidal capillary layer, the vertical line is the macular fovea position calibration line, (1B) shows the en-face image, and (1C) shows the blood flow signal acquisition image. (1D) shows the blood flow pixel image.
Comparison of general clinical data between craniopharyngioma group and normal control group ( ± s).
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 11.8 ± 2.7 | 11.6 ± 2.8 | 0.71 |
| Gender (Male/Female) | 20/18 | 20/18 | 1.00 |
| Refractive error (D) | 0.08 ± 0.41 | 0.10 ± 0.37 | 0.55 |
| Axial length (mm) | 23.62 ± 1.43 | 23.48 ± 0.21 | 0.37 |
| BCVA | 0.55 ± 0.34 | 1.01 ± 0.19 | <0.01 |
Comparison of the visual prognosis of the low CCD group and the normal CCD group after decompression.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Preoperative craniopharyngioma size (cm) | 3.5 ± 1.2 | 3.4 ± 1.4 | 0.742 | |||||||
| Postoperative decompression grade (0/1/2) | 37/2/2 | 22/4/3 | 0.672 | |||||||
| BCVA | 0.58 ± 0.29 | 0.21 ± 0.16 | 0.57 ± 0.24 | 0.18 ± 0.09 | 0.65 ± 0.24 | 0.22 ± 0.11 | 0.642 | 0.036 | 0.039 | |
| MD | −4.6 ± 1.1 | −9.9 ± 2.3 | −2.2 ± 0.8 | −7.3 ± 2.2 | −0.9 ± 0.2 | −3.5 ± 1.2 | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.014 | |
| PSD | 4.7 ± 0.9 | 8.7 ± 1.3 | 3.2 ± 0.3 | 6.2 ± 0.8 | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 4.5 ± 0.6 | 0.012 | 0.003 | 0.006 | |
| CCD | 47.9 ± 3.3 | 23.4 ± 2.1 | 47.3 ± 3.1 | 22.9 ± 1.9 | 58.6 ± 3.4 | 27.4 ± 2.2 | 0.792 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
P1: Differences between Normal and Low CCD group in baseline (Visit1).
P2: Differences of changes (Visit2–Visit1) from visit 2 to 1 between Normal and Low CCD group.
P3: Differences of changes (Visit3–Visit1) from visit 3 to 1 between Normal and Low CCD group.
P4: Differences of changes (Visit3–Visit2) from visit 3 to 2 between Normal and Low CCD group.
Figure 2Linear regression image comparing the prognosis changes of CCD and BCVA. y = 0.0167* x + −0.1667, r = 0.878; p < 0.001.
Figure 3Comparison of the BCVA changes from pre-operative to post-operative assessment among eyes in the low and normal CCD group.