| Literature DB >> 35096653 |
Lei Wang1,2, Yan Wang1, Fang Wang1, Mengdi Zhao3, Xuzhu Gao1, Huimin Chen1, Na Li4, Qing Zhu5, Lipin Liu5, Wenjun Zhu1, Xia Liu1, Yujiao Chen1, Ping Zhou1, Yingzhi Lu1, Kun Wang1, Weiguo Zhao2, Wei Liang1.
Abstract
Cryptococcus neoformans (C. neoformans)/C. gattii can easily invade the human central nervous system and cause cryptococcal meningitis (CM). The clinical fatality rate of these fungi is extremely high and causes more than 180,000 deaths worldwide every year. At present, the common clinical identification methods of these fungi are traditional culture methods and Indian ink staining. In addition, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISAs), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), real-time quantitative PCR detecting system (qPCR), mass spectrometry, and metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) have also been applied to detect these fungus. Due to the rapid progress of meningitis caused by C. neoformans/C. gattii infection, there is a desperate need for fast, sensitive, and on-site detection methods to meet the clinical diagnosis. Recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) is a promising isothermal amplification technique that can compensate for the shortcomings of the above techniques, featuring short reaction time, high specificity, and high sensitivity, thus meeting the demand for in-field detection of C.neoformans/C. gattii. In our study, RPA- lateral flow strip (LFS) was used to amplify the capsule-associated gene, CAP64, of C. neoformans/C. gattii, and the primer-probe design was optimized by introducing base mismatches to obtain a specific and sensitive primer-probe combination for clinical testing, and specificity of the detection system was determined for 26 common clinical pathogens. This system was developed to obtain results in 20 min at an isothermal temperature of 37°C with a lower limit of detection as low as 10 CFU/μL or 1 fg/μL. A total of 487 clinical samples collected from multicenter multiplexes were tested to evaluate the detection performance of the RPA-LFS system, which revealed that the system could specifically detect C. neoformans/C. gattii, meeting the need for rapid, specific, and sensitive detection.Entities:
Keywords: C. gattii; C. neoformans; CAP64; RPA-LFS; base mismatches
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35096653 PMCID: PMC8790172 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.803798
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Figure 1Primer and probe design screening strategy. (A) Detection of target gene selection. (B) Sequence information of F2/R2. (C) Agarose gel showing PCR amplification using primers F2/R2 and C neoformans genomic DNA as the template. (D) Sequence information of the candidate probe P. (E) Probe and reverse primers form the cross dimer. (F) Modified probe and reverse primer sequence information. (G) Schematic diagram of forward primer screening.
Figure 2Screening of primers and probes. (A) Agarose gel showing PCR amplification of the primers using C neoformans genomic DNA as the template. The primer pair name is indicated at the top of each lane. NTC, no-template control of the respective primer pair. The band sizes of the DNA ladder are shown on the right. (B) Lateral flow strip (LFS) results of recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) with different primer-probe sets. The name of each primer-probe set is indicated at the top of each strip. NTC, no-template control. The positions of test and control lines are marked on the right. The template was C. neoformans genomic DNA and reactions were performed at 37°C for 20 min.
Figure 3Targeting fragment of the primer-probe set R2/P. Alignment of the targeted DNA fragments from five different serotypes of C. neoformans/C. gattii was performed by NCBI BLAST. The serotypes are indicated at the beginning of each sequence. The sequences corresponding to the primers and the probe are written under their positions in the alignment. The arrow lines indicate the direction of extension of the primer and probe. The tetrahydrofuran (THF) site is represented by a “H”.
Figure 4Detection inclusivity among different reference strains and sputum isolate strains. LFS results of RPA amplification of different genomic DNA templates. The names of the strains are indicated on top of each strip. NTC, no-template control. The positions of the Control and Test lines are indicated on the right of the image. The reactions were performed at 37°C for 20 min.
Figure 5Detection specificity among common pathogens. LFS results of RPA of different bacterial culture templates. The species of bacteria are indicated at the top of each strip. NTC, no-template control. The positions of the Control and Test lines are indicated on the right of the image. The reactions were performed at 37°C for 20 min.
Determination of coincidence rate between the RPA-LFS assay and India ink staining methods in clinical samples.
| RPA-LFS assay | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | Total | X2 | ||
| India ink staining methods | Positive | 78 | 0 | 78 | |
| 10.08 | |||||
| Negative | 12 | 397 | 409 | P<0.05 | |
| Total | 90 | 397 | 487 | ||