| Literature DB >> 35096648 |
Sara Morselli1, Valeria Gaspari2, Alessia Cantiani1, Melissa Salvo1, Claudio Foschi1, Tiziana Lazzarotto1, Antonella Marangoni1.
Abstract
We assessed the characteristics of Neisseria meningitidis pharyngeal carriage in a cohort of 'men having sex with men', including patients with pharyngeal Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection. In the period 2017-2019, among all the oropharyngeal samples tested for gonorrhoea from MSM attending a STI Clinic in Bologna (Italy), we randomly selected 244 N. gonorrhoeae-positive samples and 403 negatives (n=647). Pharyngeal specimens were tested for N. meningitidis presence, by the detection of sodC gene. N. meningitidis-positive samples were further grouped by PCR tests for the major invasive genogroups (i.e., A, B, C, W, and Y). A molecular assay, targeting capsule transporter gene, was used to determine meningococcal capsular status. Overall, 75.8% (491/647) of samples tested positive for sodC gene, indicating a pharyngeal meningococcal carriage. Meningococcal colonisation was significantly more frequent in younger subjects (P=0.009), with no association with HIV infection. Non-groupable meningococci represented most of pharyngeal carriages (about 71%). The commonest N. meningitidis serogroup was B (23.6%), followed by C (2.1%), Y (1.8%) and W (1.1%). Meningococci were often characterized by the genetic potential of capsule production. Interestingly, a negative association between N. meningitidis and N. gonorrhoeae was found: pharyngeal gonorrhoea was significantly more present in patients without meningococcal carriage (P=0.03). Although preliminary, our data added knowledge on the epidemiology of meningococcal carriage in MSM communities at high risk of gonococcal infections, gaining new insights into the interactions/dynamics between N. meningitidis and N. gonorrhoeae.Entities:
Keywords: MSM; Neisseria gonorrhoeae; Neisseria meningitidis; meningococcal carriage; oro-pharynx
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35096648 PMCID: PMC8790146 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.798575
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Real-time PCR primers and probes used for N. meningitidis detection, typing, and assessment of capsular status.
| Primers/probes | Sequence (5’ - 3’) | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Nm | GCACACTTAGGTGATTTACCTGCAT | Detection of NM ( |
| Nm csa forward | GCCACAAAGTGCCCTTCCT | NM typing (group A) |
| Nm csb forward | ATTATACAGCCTGCTCATCTCTATATGC | NM typing (group B) |
| Nm csc forward | GCACATTCAGGCGGGATTA | NM typing (group C) |
| Nm csy forward | GTACGATATCCCTATCCTTGCCTATAA | NM typing (group Y) |
| Nm csw forward | TGGTGTATGATATTCCAATCGTTGT | NM typing (group W) |
| Nm | GCTGCGGTAGGTGGTTCAA | Capsule transporter gene ( |
Figure 1Cases of meningococcal carriage stratified by age. Five-years periods were considered. (A) distribution of NM positive and negative cases considering all the MSM included in the study. (B) distribution of NM positive and negative cases in HIV positive people. (C) distribution of groupable and non-groupable NM cases.
Figure 2Characteristics of meningococcal pharyngeal carriage. Distribution of NM serogroups (the five major invasive serogroups were searched, namely A, B, C, Y, W).
Characteristics of meningococcal carriage.
| NM positive (n = 491) | NM negative (n = 156) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 35.4% (174/491) | 44.8% (70/156) | 0.03* |
|
| 20.3% (100/491) | 16.6% (26/156) | 0.35 |
|
| 6.7% (33/491) | 8.9% (14/156) | 0.37 |
|
| 32.6 ± 9.7 | 34.9 ± 10.0 | 0.009* |
*statistically significant.The table shows the associations between NM pharyngeal carriage and available variables. Fisher’s exact test was used to assess statistical significance for categorical data (i.e., GC, HIV and CT positivity), whereas t-test for quantitative data (age).