| Literature DB >> 35096547 |
Sherifa Ahmed Hamed1, Kotb Abbas Metwalley2, Hekma Saad Farghaly2, Amira Mohamed Oseily3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Healthy vestibular system adjusts balance during static and dynamic conditions. This is important for normal development (standing up and walking). Vestipulopathies (central and peripheral) are common complications of diabetes in adult population. Related studies are scare in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D). AIM: To assess saccular function of otolith organ in children with T1D and predictors for its dysfunction.Entities:
Keywords: Cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential; Children; Otilith organ; Type 1 diabetes
Year: 2022 PMID: 35096547 PMCID: PMC8771316 DOI: 10.5409/wjcp.v11.i1.61
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Clin Pediatr ISSN: 2219-2808
The demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics of the studied children
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10-18 (13.63 ± 1.50) | 9-18 (15.44 ± 1.22) | 0.438 |
|
| |||
| Male | 10 (25) | 9 (36) | 0.185 |
| Female | 30 (75) | 16 (64) | 0.223 |
|
| 15.70-25.30 (20.53 ± 2.52) | 15.20-27.50 (18.86 ± 2.63) | 0.278 |
|
| 100-130 (110.80 ± 10.50) | 100-120 (105.00 ± 8.50) | 0.365 |
|
| 60-80 (70.55 ± 2.34) | 60-70 (68.33 ± 5.20) | 0.544 |
|
| 4–15 (8.54 ± 2.33) | - | - |
|
| 3–10 (5.62 ± 2.80) | - | - |
| ≤ 5 | 9 (22.5) | ||
| > 5 | 31 (77.5) | ||
|
| 22 (55) | - | - |
|
| 0–6 (3.44 ± 0.43) | ||
|
| 12 (30) | - | - |
|
| 0–6 (2.50 ± 0.32) | ||
|
| 18 (45) | 3 (12) | 0.01 |
|
| 5.00–15.65 (8.68 ± 1.50) | 3.00–6.00 (3.90 ± 0.25) | 0.001 |
| ≤ 7% | 4 (10) | ||
| > 7% | 36 (90) | ||
|
| 0.80–2.10 (1.70 ± 0.32) | - | - |
|
| |||
| Total cholesterol | 100-250 (180.20 ± 20.50) | 90–200 (140.21 ± 15.65) | 0.06 |
| Triglycerides | 60-280 (168.52 ± 22.50) | 50–120 (80.50 ± 20.58) | 0.001 |
| LDL | 50-160 (100.65 ± 10.62) | 65–110 (85.43 ± 6.46) | 0.08 |
| HDL | 45-65 (55.52 ± 5.33) | 35–70 (48.33± 5.62) | 0.364 |
|
| |||
| Hypertension | 5 (12.5) | - | - |
| Hypercholesterolemia/dyslipidemia | 8 (20) | - | - |
|
| 0.54–1.20 (0.80 ± 0.15) | 0.40–0.90 (0.62 ± 0.05) | 0.450 |
|
| |||
| Nephropathy | 6 (15) | - | - |
| Peripheral neuropathy | 16 (40) | - | - |
|
| 6 (10) | - | - |
BMI: Body mass index; LDL: Low density lipoprotein; HDL: High density lipoprotein; Hb1Ac: Hemoglobin A1c; DKA: Diabetic ketoacidosis.
Cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential results of the studied groups (mean ± SD)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| P1 latency, | ||||
| Unilateral | 6 (15) | - | - | - |
| Bilateral | 10 (25) | - | - | - |
| Range, ms | ||||
| Right ear | 18.00–22.00 (20.16 ± 1.34) | 10.40–16.40 (12.03 ± 1.01) | 0.03 | 0.542 |
| Left ear | 13.00–29.00 (20.40 ± 1.10) | 10.40–17.60 (14.25 ± 1.68) | 0.02 | |
| N1 latency, | ||||
| Unilateral | 6 (15) | - | - | - |
| Bilateral | 10 (25) | - | - | - |
| Range, ms | ||||
| Right ear | 22.00–33.00 (28.30 ± 2.66) | 18.65–26.70 (22.43 ± 1.82) | 0.04 | 0.364 |
| Left ear | 24.00–36.80 (32.35 ± 2.84) | 16.82–30.82 (26.45 ± 1.02) | 0.03 | |
| P1-N1 amplitude, | ||||
| Unilateral | 10 (25) | - | - | - |
| Bilateral | 24 (60) | - | - | - |
| Range, μV | ||||
| Right ear | ||||
| Range | 20.00–90.00 | 48.60–92.80 | 0.001 | 0.458 |
| Median | 44.20 | 72.43 | ||
| 25th | 36.00 | 60.35 | ||
| 50th | 40.45 | 76.44 | ||
| 75th | 48.55 | 86.62 | ||
| Left ear | ||||
| Range | 26.68–86.00 | 46.03–98.00 | 0.001 | |
| Median | 46.20 | 74.68 | ||
| 25th | 33.25 | 54.36 | ||
| 50th | 45.00 | 80.00 | ||
| 75th | 56.25 | 88.56 | ||
| AR | ||||
| Range | 1.12–66.20 | 0.0-15.8 | 0.001 | |
| Median | 18.30 | 4.88 | ||
| 25th | 6.58 | 1.88 | ||
| 50th | 13.36 | 2.90 | ||
| 75th | 32.44 | 6.30 | ||
|
| 10 (25) | 0 |
Number of subjects with vestibular evoked myogenic potential abnormalities results.
P1: Significance for patients vs controls; P2: Significance for patients' right vs left ear; AR: Asymmetry ratio; T1D: Type 1 diabetes.
Cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential's results for children with type 1 diabetes in relation to their demographic, clinical and laboratory variables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| 22.35 ± 1.12 | 26.32 ± 2.30 | 44.82 | 10.33 |
| P1 | 0.02 | 0.320 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
|
| 18.22 ± 1.63 | 32.55 ± 1.22 | 38.36 | 16.85 |
| P1 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| P2 | 0.125 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.126 |
|
| ||||
|
| 16.68 ± 1.23 | 22.65 ± 2.22 | 38.30 | 6.50 |
| P1 | 0.02 | 0.244 | 0.03 | 0.05 |
|
| 28.33 ± 1.11 | 35.07 ± 2.31 | 56.26 | 18.68 |
| P1 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.001 | 0.0001 |
| P2 | 0.006 | 0.01 | 0.001 | 0.452 |
|
| ||||
|
| 26.03 ± 1.33 | 34.68 ± 2.57 | 38.64 | 10.64 |
| P1 | 0.002 | 0.01 | 0.001 | 0.01 |
|
| 16.23 ± 1.28 | 28.05 ± 2.28 | 56.00 | 16.28 |
| P1 | 0.138 | 0.302 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| P2 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.06 |
|
| ||||
|
| 16.83 ± 1.30 | 22.01 ± 1.20 | 60.00 | 8.64 |
| P1 | 0.306 | 0.358 | 0.08 | 0.023 |
|
| 25.633 ± 1.28 | 34.55 ± 1.33 | 32.50 | 18.28 |
| P1 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.001 | 0.804 |
| P2 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.001 | 0.246 |
|
| ||||
|
| 27.23 ± 1.20 | 34.25 ± 1.88 | 38.50 | 16.35 |
| P1 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
|
| 14.84 ± 1.11 | 21.15 ± 1.23 | 55.84 | 8.00 |
| P1 | 0.358 | 0.682 | 0.01 | 0.04 |
| P2 | 0.003 | 0.001 | 0.01 | 0.323 |
|
| 26.86 ± 1.80 | 34.22 ± 2.02 | 30.40 | 12.86 |
|
| ||||
| P1 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.001 | 0.01 |
|
| 16.50 ± 1.44 | 25.24 ± 2.562 | 54.68 | 10.35 |
| P1 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| P2 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.286 |
|
| ||||
|
| 23.28 ± 1.30 | 32.26 ± 1.45 | 35.06 | 16.60 |
| P1 | 0.001 | 0.01 | 0.001 | 0.01 |
|
| 16.44 ± 1.03 | 24.24 ± 1.40 | 52.66 | 13.44 |
| P1 | 0.458 | 0.542 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| P2 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.322 |
| Control subjects | 13.22 ± 1.30 | 23.82 ± 1.37 | 74.68 | 4.88 |
DKA: Diabetic ketoacidosis; P1: Significance vs controls; P2: Significance for a vs b for each variable.