| Literature DB >> 35095707 |
Yanbing Hou1, Lingyu Zhang1, Qianqian Wei1, Ruwei Ou1, Jing Yang1, Qiyong Gong2, Huifang Shang1.
Abstract
Background: Idiopathic blepharospasm (BSP) is a common adult-onset focal dystonia. Neuroimaging technology can be used to visualize functional and microstructural changes of the whole brain. Method: We used resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) and graph theoretical analysis to explore the functional connectome in patients with BSP. Altogether 20 patients with BSP and 20 age- and gender-matched healthy controls (HCs) were included in the study. Measures of network topology were calculated, such as small-world parameters (clustering coefficient [C p], the shortest path length [L p]), network efficiency parameters (global efficiency [E glob], local efficiency [E loc]), and the nodal parameter (nodal efficiency [E nod]). In addition, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was adopted to determine the most critical imaging features, and the classification model using critical imaging features was constructed.Entities:
Keywords: blepharospasm; graph theory; least absolute shrinkage and selection operator; network; resting-state functional MRI
Year: 2022 PMID: 35095707 PMCID: PMC8791229 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.708634
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the total samples.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Number, | 20 | 20 | – |
| Handedness of writing (Right: Left) | 20: 0 | 20: 0 | – |
| Age, years | 53.00 ± 8.78 | 53.90 ± 8.64 | 0.746 |
| Gender, Male/Female | 5/15 | 4/16 | 0.705 |
| Duration of disease, years | – | 3.26 ± 2.40 | – |
| JRS-severity sub-score | – | 3.05 ± 0.83 | – |
| JRS-frequency sub-score | – | 2.80 ± 0.83 | – |
| JRS-total score | – | 5.85 ± 1.63 | – |
BSP, blepharospasm; JRS, Jankovic rating scale.
Figure 1(A) Small-world properties in patients with BSP and HCs (with GSR); (B) small-world properties in patients with BSP and HCs (without GSR); (C) global topographic properties in BSP and HC groups with over the selected range of the sparsity threshold (with GSR); (D) global topographic properties in BSP and HC groups with over the selected range of the sparsity threshold (without GSR). BSP, blepharospasm; Cp, clustering coefficient; Eglob, global efficiency; Eloc, local efficiency; GSR, global signal regression; HC, healthy control; Lp, characteristic path length.
Figure 2(A) Inter-group differences in global topographic properties (with GSR); (B) inter-group differences in global topographic properties (without GSR). Values on the y-axis represent the AUC of the graph indices across the range of the sparsity threshold. AUC, area under the curve; BSP, blepharospasm; Cp, clustering coefficient; Eglob, global efficiency; Eloc, local efficiency; HC, healthy control; Lp, characteristic path length.
Figure 3(A) Variables selection by LASSO regression in the classification model; (B) coefficient of each variable in the model; (C) the ROC curves in classifying patients with BSP for the model; (D) internal validation for the model. The testing sets were randomly sampled from the whole cohort by 19 times. The sample size was increased from 21 to 39; (E) abnormal nodal centralities in patients with BSP compared with HCs (the blue node representing the decreased Enod in patients with BSP, the red node representing the increased Enod in patients with BSP, and the green node representing no difference between patients with BSP and HCs). ant, anterior; AUC, area under the curve; BSP, blepharospasm; dlPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; Enod, nodal efficiency; HC, healthy control; IPS, intraparietal sulcus; LASSO, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator; lat, lateral; med, medial; post, posterior; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; ROI, region of interest.
Comparison of critical imaging features between patients with BSP and HCs and the corresponding coefficients.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
| −12.582335 | ||||||||
| 21 | Precuneus | R | Default | 0.1371 ± 0.0010 | 0.1284 ± 0.0088 | 0.0132* | 0.0341 | 25.6232737 | – |
| 30 | IPS | L | Default | 0.1382 ± 0.0087 | 0.1317 ± 0.0073 | 0.0181 | 0.0341 | 9.10143256 | – |
| 117 | Post parietal/postcentral | L | Sensorimotor | 0.1433 ± 0.0068 | 0.1354 ± 0.0110 | 0.0227 | 0.0341 | 41.1562545 | – |
| 126 | Occipital | R | Occipital | 0.1397 ± 0.0063 | 0.1352 ± 0.0073 | 0.0195 | 0.0341 | 10.2355905 | – |
| 143 | Lat cerebellum | L | Cerebellum | 0.1349 ± 0.0083 | 0.1302 ± 0.0070 | 0.0810 | 0.0911 | 17.2030057 | – |
| 150 | Med cerebellum | L | Cerebellum | 0.1441 ± 0.0090 | 0.1366 ± 0.0086 | 0.0095 | 0.0341 | 36.1654607 | – |
|
| – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| 42 | dlPFC | R | Fronto-parietal | 0.1349 ± 0.0081 | 0.1386 ± 0.0100 | 0.2315 | 0.2315 | – | |
| 62 | Ant insula | L | Cingulo-opercular | 0.1440 ± 0.0010 | 0.1502 ± 0.0069 | 0.0375 | 0.0482 | – | |
| 98 | Parietal/precentral | L | Sensorimotor | 0.1389 ± 0.0094 | 0.1455 ± 0.0048 | 0.0039 | 0.0341 | – | |
Region considered abnormal.
Equation with dependent variables and the corresponding coefficients in the regression model.
ant, anterior; BSP, blepharospasm; dlPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; HC, healthy control; IPS, intraparietal sulcus; L, left; lat, lateral; med, medial; post, posterior; R, right.