| Literature DB >> 35095593 |
Jun-He Zhou1,2, De-Long Zhang1, Bai-Le Ning1, Xiao-Juan Xue1, Lin Zhao2, Qian Wu2, Lu-Da Yan3, Ming Liu1, Wen-Bin Fu2,4.
Abstract
Introduction: Perimenopausal depression is predominantly caused by hormone shock, but the underlying physical and psychological factors are still unclear.Entities:
Keywords: QOL (quality of life); acupuncture; depression; embodied cognition; perimenopause
Year: 2022 PMID: 35095593 PMCID: PMC8793332 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.772523
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychiatry ISSN: 1664-0640 Impact factor: 4.157
Figure 1Research flow chart. EA represents the electroacupuncture group, and MC represents the escitalopram group.
Figure 2Correlation analysis and structural equation model. (a) Both FSH and LH have a positive correlation with MENQOL, and MENQOL has a positive correlation with HAMD. (b1) Each wire of the electroacupuncture device connects 2 acupoints to form a loop, and the wire of the electroacupuncture device is connected to the needle handle. Hormones, including FSH, LH, E2, and hormone shock, are the main factors associated with a series of symptoms of perimenopause. (b2) Symptoms and quality of life include common clinical symptoms of perimenopausal patients, most of which are caused by hormone shock. (b3) Symptoms and quality of life are related to depression, and cognitive impairment is the dominant dimension in depressive symptoms. (c) Structural equation model of mediation effect. Structural equation model of mediation effect. The latent variable hormones include FSH and LH. MENQOL is the intermediary variable of the model. Hormones point to MENQOL, and MENQOL points to HAMD-17. The relationship between hormones, symptoms and quality of life and depression.
Baseline data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race | Han | 101 (93.5%) | 100 (96.2%) | 0.539 |
| Others | 7 (6.5%) | 4 (3.8%) | / | |
| Marital status | Married | 1 (0.9%) | 0 (0%) | 0.239 |
| Unmarried | 107 (99.1%) | 102 (98.1%) | / | |
| Divorced | 0 (0%) | 2 (1.9%) | / | |
| Working status | Employed | 63 (58.3%) | 56 (52.9%) | 0.490 |
| Unemployed | 45 (41.7%) | 49 (47.1%) | / | |
| BMI | / | 22.65 ± 2.60 | 22.40 ± 2.44 | 0.482 |
| Stage | Early menopausal transition | 45 (41.7%) | 41 (39.4%) | 0.839 |
| Late menopausal transition | 24 (22.2%) | 27 (26.0%) | / | |
| Early postmenopause | 39 (36.1%) | 36 (34.6%) | / | |
| ALT (U/L) | / | 20.44 ± 9.05 | 19.73 ± 10.17 | 0.347 |
| AST (U/L) | / | 22.49 ± 7.92 | 22.53 ± 6.58 | 0.764 |
| TBIL (μmol/L) | / | 12.18 ± 5.25 | 12.46 ± 5.84 | 0.853 |
| BUN (mmol/L) | / | 5.17 ± 4.98 | 4.87 ± 5.00 | 0.064 |
| Cr (μmol/L) | / | 60.98 ± 18.49 | 58.94 ± 20.14 | 0.218 |
BMI, body mass index; ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, glutamic oxalacetic transaminase; TBIL, total bilirubin; BUN, urea nitrogen; Cr, creatinine.
Figure 3Trends in the efficacy of HAMD-17 and MENQOL. EA, acupuncture group; MC, medication group.
Efficacy data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 0 | FSH (pmol/L) | 42.24 ± 34.63 | 45.86 ± 35.65 | 0.400 |
| E2 (IU/L) | 179.52 ± 250.88 | 146.02 ± 203.22 | 0.287 | |
| LH (IU/L) | 22.91 ± 17.35 | 23.90 ± 19.07 | 0.891 | |
| Week 12 | FSH (pmol/L) | 44.04 ± 35.65 | 44.32 ± 35.78 | 0.409 |
| E2 (IU/L) | 156.97 ± 250.88 | 169.16 ± 267.11 | 0.241 | |
| LH (IU/L) | 23.58 ± 18.61 | 23.82 ± 17.94 | 0.574 | |
| Week 0 | MENQOL | 60.65 ± 32.13 | 60.32 ± 34.48 | 0.734 |
| Week 4 -Week 0 | 11.48 ± 13.28 | 7.68 ± 8.26 | 0.209 | |
| Week 8 - Week 0 | 19.60 ± 18.56 | 14.65 ± 13.69 | 0.199 | |
| Week 12 - Week 0 | 25.15 ± 22.74 | 19.60 ± 17.13 | 0.348 | |
| Week 16 - Week 0 | 26.50 ± 22.73 | 20.01 ± 18.82 | 0.088 | |
| Week 20 - Week 0 | 28.45 ± 22.76 | 19.93 ± 19.85 | 0.011 | |
| Week 24 - Week 0 | 29.77 ± 23.92 | 21.07 ± 20.74 | 0.008 | |
|
| ||||
| Week 0 | HAMD-17 | 16.06 ± 3.90 | 16.09 ± 3.48 | 0.518 |
| Week 4 - Week 0 | 2.90 ± 2.95 | 2.41 ± 2.46 | 0.467 | |
| Week 8 - Week 0 | 5.02 ± 3.36 | 4.07 ± 3.53 | 0.064 | |
| Week 12 - Week 0 | 6.45 ± 4.51 | 5.12 ± 3.86 | 0.052 | |
| Week 16 - Week 0 | 6.94 ± 4.56 | 5.40 ± 4.00 | 0.023 | |
| Week 24 - Week 0 | 7.81 ± 4.82 | 5.76 ± 4.16 | 0.001 | |
FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; E.
P < 0.01,
P < 0.05.
Figure 4Latent profile analysis of the two groups. (A) Latent profile analysis of HAMD-17 at different evaluation time points in the electroacupuncture group. (B) Latent profile analysis of HAMD-17 at different evaluation time points in the escitalopram group. EA, acupuncture group; MA, medication group; T1, 0 week; T2, 4 weeks; T3, 8 weeks; T4, 12 weeks; T5, 16 weeks; T7, 24 weeks.
Adverse reactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EA | Pain | 4 | 0/4 | No special treatment | Restoration |
| Dizziness | 3 | 3/0 | Rest | Restoration | |
| Hematoma | 4 | 4/0 | Hemostasis | Restoration | |
| Infection | 0 | 0 | / | / | |
| Others | 0 | 0 | / | / | |
| MC | Dizziness | 6 | 0/6 | Rest | Restoration |
| Gastrointestinal reaction | 5 | 5/0 | Reduce the dose and rest | Restoration | |
| Allergy | 0 | 0 | / | / | |
| Mood disorders | 0 | 0 | / | / | |
| Exhausted | 1 | 1/0 | Rest | Restoration | |
| Others | 0 | 0 | / | / |
EA, acupuncture group; MC, medication group.