Literature DB >> 35094122

Salted fish and processed foods intake and nasopharyngeal carcinoma risk: a dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies.

Mei Lian1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aims to analyze whether the consumption of salted fish and processed foods increases the risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma by analyzing the relevant case-control or cohort design.
METHODS: Major databases such as PubMed, ScienceDirect, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched to conduct related studies. In addition, Newcastle-Ottawa scale was employed for assessing the quality of articles. Random-effect model was utilized for meta-analysis. Total relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated.
RESULTS: Dose response showed a consistent linear relationship between the intake of salted fish and processed foods and the risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. In salted fish, the summary RR was 1.23 (1.04-1.47) for low intake and 1.45 (1.19-1.76) for high intake. For processed meat, low intake was 1.33 (1.09-1.62) and high intake was 1.65 (1.35-2.02). Low intake of processed vegetables was 1.28 (1.05-1.55) and high intake was 1.45 (1.17 -1.79) for high intake. Significant heterogeneity existed in all data but decreased in some subgroups after subgroup analysis.
CONCLUSION: Salted fish and processed foods are risk factors for increasing nasopharyngeal carcinoma, but they have different risk characteristics due to different intakes, different stages, and different types.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nasopharyngeal carcinoma; Processed foods; Risk; Salted fish

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35094122     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-07210-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   3.236


  45 in total

1.  Preserved foods in relation to risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Shanghai, China.

Authors:  J M Yuan; X L Wang; Y B Xiang; Y T Gao; R K Ross; M C Yu
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  Adulthood consumption of preserved and nonpreserved vegetables and the risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lisa Gallicchio; Genevieve Matanoski; Xuguang Grant Tao; Liwei Chen; Tram K Lam; Kristina Boyd; Karen A Robinson; Lyssa Balick; Stephanie Mickelson; Laura E Caulfield; James G Herman; Eliseo Guallar; Anthony J Alberg
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Comparison of two methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jaime L Peters; Alex J Sutton; David R Jones; Keith R Abrams; Lesley Rushton
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-02-08       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Past and Recent Salted Fish and Preserved Food Intakes Are Weakly Associated with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Risk in Adults in Southern China.

Authors:  Donal Barrett; Alexander Ploner; Ellen T Chang; Zhiwei Liu; Cai-Xia Zhang; Qing Liu; Yonglin Cai; Zhe Zhang; Guomin Chen; Qi-Hong Huang; Shang-Hang Xie; Su-Mei Cao; Jian-Yong Shao; Wei-Hua Jia; Yuming Zheng; Jian Liao; Yufeng Chen; Longde Lin; Ingemar Ernberg; Hans-Olov Adami; Guangwu Huang; Yi Zeng; Yi-Xin Zeng; Weimin Ye
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 6.  The enigmatic epidemiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Ellen T Chang; Hans-Olov Adami
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  A case-control study of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the high background radiation areas of Yangjiang, China.

Authors:  J Zou; Q Sun; S Akiba; Y Yuan; Y Zha; Z Tao; L Wei; T Sugahara
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.724

8.  Epidemiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Mimi C Yu; Jian-Min Yuan
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 15.707

Review 9.  The Evolving Epidemiology of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Ellen T Chang; Weimin Ye; Yi-Xin Zeng; Hans-Olov Adami
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.