Literature DB >> 35094055

Future of biomedical, agricultural, and biological systems research using domesticated animals.

Thomas E Spencer1, Kevin D Wells1, Kiho Lee1, Bhanu P Telugu1, Peter J Hansen2, Frank F Bartol3, LeAnn Blomberg4, Lawrence B Schook5, Harry Dawson6, Joan K Lunney7, John P Driver2, Teresa A Davis8, Sharon M Donovan9, Ryan N Dilger4, Linda J Saif10, Adam Moeser11, Jodi L McGill12, George Smith13, James J Ireland13.   

Abstract

Increased knowledge of reproduction and health of domesticated animals is integral to sustain and improve global competitiveness of U.S. animal agriculture, understand and resolve complex animal and human diseases, and advance fundamental research in sciences that are critical to understanding mechanisms of action and identifying future targets for interventions. Historically, federal and state budgets have dwindled and funding for the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) competitive grants programs remained relatively stagnant from 1985 through 2010. This shortage in critical financial support for basic and applied research, coupled with the underappreciated knowledge of the utility of non-rodent species for biomedical research, hindered funding opportunities for research involving livestock and limited improvements in both animal agriculture and animal and human health. In 2010, the National Institutes of Health and USDA NIFA established an interagency partnership to promote the use of agriculturally important animal species in basic and translational research relevant to both biomedicine and agriculture. This interagency program supported 61 grants totaling over $107 million with 23 awards to new or early-stage investigators. This article will review the success of the 9-year Dual Purpose effort and highlight opportunities for utilizing domesticated agricultural animals in research. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Society for the Study of Reproduction 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NIH; USDA; animal; domestic; research; systems

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35094055      PMCID: PMC9189970          DOI: 10.1093/biolre/ioac019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Reprod        ISSN: 0006-3363            Impact factor:   4.161


  46 in total

1.  A history of farm animal embryo transfer and some associated techniques.

Authors:  Keith J Betteridge
Journal:  Anim Reprod Sci       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 2.145

2.  Comparing phenotypic variation between inbred and outbred mice.

Authors:  Alexander H Tuttle; Vivek M Philip; Elissa J Chesler; Jeffrey S Mogil
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Research priorities. Farm animal research in crisis.

Authors:  R M Roberts; G W Smith; F W Bazer; J Cibelli; G E Seidel; D E Bauman; L P Reynolds; J J Ireland
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Author Correction: Comparing phenotypic variation between inbred and outbred mice.

Authors:  Alexander H Tuttle; Vivek M Philip; Elissa J Chesler; Jeffrey S Mogil
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  Single step production of Cas9 mRNA for zygote injection.

Authors:  Bethany K Redel; Benjamin P Beaton; Lee D Spate; Joshua A Benne; Stephanie L Murphy; Chad W O'Gorman; Anna M Spate; Randall S Prather; Kevin D Wells
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 1.993

Review 6.  Genetically engineered pig models for human diseases.

Authors:  Randall S Prather; Monique Lorson; Jason W Ross; Jeffrey J Whyte; Eric Walters
Journal:  Annu Rev Anim Biosci       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 8.923

Review 7.  Reproductive science and the future of the planet.

Authors:  Jock K Findlay; Michael K Holland; Bob B M Wong
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 8.  Temporal trends in sperm count: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.

Authors:  Hagai Levine; Niels Jørgensen; Anderson Martino-Andrade; Jaime Mendiola; Dan Weksler-Derri; Irina Mindlis; Rachel Pinotti; Shanna H Swan
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 15.610

9.  Production of CFTR-null and CFTR-DeltaF508 heterozygous pigs by adeno-associated virus-mediated gene targeting and somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Christopher S Rogers; Yanhong Hao; Tatiana Rokhlina; Melissa Samuel; David A Stoltz; Yuhong Li; Elena Petroff; Daniel W Vermeer; Amanda C Kabel; Ziying Yan; Lee Spate; David Wax; Clifton N Murphy; August Rieke; Kristin Whitworth; Michael L Linville; Scott W Korte; John F Engelhardt; Michael J Welsh; Randall S Prather
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 14.808

10.  The Human Cell Atlas.

Authors:  Aviv Regev; Sarah A Teichmann; Eric S Lander; Ido Amit; Christophe Benoist; Ewan Birney; Bernd Bodenmiller; Peter Campbell; Piero Carninci; Menna Clatworthy; Hans Clevers; Bart Deplancke; Ian Dunham; James Eberwine; Roland Eils; Wolfgang Enard; Andrew Farmer; Lars Fugger; Berthold Göttgens; Nir Hacohen; Muzlifah Haniffa; Martin Hemberg; Seung Kim; Paul Klenerman; Arnold Kriegstein; Ed Lein; Sten Linnarsson; Emma Lundberg; Joakim Lundeberg; Partha Majumder; John C Marioni; Miriam Merad; Musa Mhlanga; Martijn Nawijn; Mihai Netea; Garry Nolan; Dana Pe'er; Anthony Phillipakis; Chris P Ponting; Stephen Quake; Wolf Reik; Orit Rozenblatt-Rosen; Joshua Sanes; Rahul Satija; Ton N Schumacher; Alex Shalek; Ehud Shapiro; Padmanee Sharma; Jay W Shin; Oliver Stegle; Michael Stratton; Michael J T Stubbington; Fabian J Theis; Matthias Uhlen; Alexander van Oudenaarden; Allon Wagner; Fiona Watt; Jonathan Weissman; Barbara Wold; Ramnik Xavier; Nir Yosef
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.