Philippe Gorphe1, Marion Classe2, Samy Ammari3, Gabriel Garcia3, Caroline Even4, Odile Casiraghi2, Ingrid Breuskin4, Yungan Tao5, Stéphane Temam4, Pierre Blanchard5, Antoine Moya-Plana4. 1. Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France. Electronic address: Philippe.GORPHE@gustaveroussy.fr. 2. Department of Pathology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France. 3. Department of Radiology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France. 4. Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There have been no studies to date of patterns of events after oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPC) treatment comprising disease progression immediately after treatment or after a disease-free interval (DFI), and causes of death, according to HPV status. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with a T1-4, N0-3, M0 OPC who completed treatment in a curative intent at our center between 2011 and 2020 were analyzed. A DFI was defined as the absence of the disease confirmed by both physical and radiological evaluation. RESULTS: We analyzed 888 patients, of who 451 were p16-positive and 437 were p16-negative. The 5-year survival rates were 82.4% vs. 44%, respectively (p < 0.0001, HR 0.24). The rates of disease progression at the end of the treatment without a DFI were 7.8% vs. 21.1% in the p16-positive vs. the p16-negative patients (p < 0.0001, OR 0.38). The 5-year competing risks of disease recurrence after a DFI were 5.6% vs. 20.5%, respectively (p < 0.0001, HR 0.26). Patients who were p16-positive had a lower risk of death from OPC disease (p < 0.0001, HR 0.23). The 5-year competing risks of a second primary cancer during follow-up were 16.1% vs. 49.9% (p = 0.0002) in the p16-positive vs. the p16- negative patients. Patients who were p16-positive had a lower risk of death from intercurrent causes (p < 0.0001, HR 0.17). CONCLUSION: Clinical trials and medical interventions dedicated to each category of events and causes of death are needed to improve survival in HPV-positive and HPV-negative OPC patients.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There have been no studies to date of patterns of events after oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPC) treatment comprising disease progression immediately after treatment or after a disease-free interval (DFI), and causes of death, according to HPV status. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with a T1-4, N0-3, M0 OPC who completed treatment in a curative intent at our center between 2011 and 2020 were analyzed. A DFI was defined as the absence of the disease confirmed by both physical and radiological evaluation. RESULTS: We analyzed 888 patients, of who 451 were p16-positive and 437 were p16-negative. The 5-year survival rates were 82.4% vs. 44%, respectively (p < 0.0001, HR 0.24). The rates of disease progression at the end of the treatment without a DFI were 7.8% vs. 21.1% in the p16-positive vs. the p16-negative patients (p < 0.0001, OR 0.38). The 5-year competing risks of disease recurrence after a DFI were 5.6% vs. 20.5%, respectively (p < 0.0001, HR 0.26). Patients who were p16-positive had a lower risk of death from OPC disease (p < 0.0001, HR 0.23). The 5-year competing risks of a second primary cancer during follow-up were 16.1% vs. 49.9% (p = 0.0002) in the p16-positive vs. the p16- negative patients. Patients who were p16-positive had a lower risk of death from intercurrent causes (p < 0.0001, HR 0.17). CONCLUSION: Clinical trials and medical interventions dedicated to each category of events and causes of death are needed to improve survival in HPV-positive and HPV-negative OPC patients.
Authors: Philippe Gorphe; Pierre Blanchard; Gabriel C T E Garcia; Marion Classe; Caroline Even; Stéphane Temam; Ingrid Breuskin Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2022-09-20 Impact factor: 4.638